Labour & Service

158 judgments — showing 101-158

3300/2017 Const. P. Jamshed Qayoom (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2019

Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quot

2084/2019 Const. P. Khair Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2019

Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quot

3275/2017 Const. P. Asif Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2019

Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quot

1724/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Idrees Adil and others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2019

Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quot

2065/2019 Const. P. Mashooq Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2019

Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quot

2063/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Achar (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2019

Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quot

179/2024 Const. P. K-Electric Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2024

Jurisdiction of ombudsman in respect of Service Matters

2833/2018 Const. P. Ali Raza (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2019

Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quot

1333/2025 Const. P. Muhammad Anjum (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

5. The Supreme Court in the recent judgment in the case of Sakhib Zar vs. M/s K-Electric Limited & others ( 2024 SCMR 1722) has held that even 10 days??? absence without leave is quantified as misconduct and on proving t

821/2023 Const. P. Muhammad Shoaib & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

Since the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Federation of Pakistan v. Muhammad Nazir, 1998 SCMR 1081, held that the employees of Pakistan Rangers fell within the definition of a civil servant, as their case falls

289/2024 Const. P. Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan (Petitioner) V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

Touching on the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 of the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is not served, the grievance petition can be dismissed. This is beca

183/2022 Const. P. Saddam Hussain Khoso (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

In the case of Muhammad Israrullah Vs Assistant Director, Manpower and others (2005 SCMR 716), the Supreme Court has held that the services of a deputationist could not be terminated as he retains his lien in the parent

6129/2025 Const. P. Janib (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Insofar as the contention that Respondent No. 4???s initial appointment in 1992 was unlawful for lack of recommendation by the Sindh Public Service Commission is concerned, the same is manifestly barred by delay and lach

1063/2025 Const. P. Mudasar Jilani (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

Given the presented facts and circumstances, the Court concludes that the Petitioner has not established sufficient grounds for intervention. Consequently, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Pet

5014/2023 Const. P. Abdul Hameed & Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

This review must consider the petitioner's eligibility, the availability of a vacancy, and all other relevant rules. The authority must also adhere to the law established by the Supreme Court in the Maula Bux Shaikh case

285/2021 Const. P. Abdul Hafeez Indhar (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2024

A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of

1105/2025 Const. P. Sohail Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

Civil Servant - Deputation - Repatriation to parent department upon completion of deputation period - Request for extension not a matter of right - Borrowing department within lawful authority to repatriate deputaonist

4676/2022 Const. P. Dr. Muhammad Ilyas Laghari (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

In conclusion, a retired civil servant can be entitled to a pro forma promotion under the law, but only if he/she can establish that he/she was denied the promotion during their service due to an administrative lapse an

331/2021 Const. P. Hassnain Ali Mangi (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2024

A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of

1037/2022 Const. P. Abdul Razzaque Hakro (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2024

A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of

1107/2022 Const. P. Aqeel Hyder Junejo (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2024

A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of

44/2022 Const. P. Mustaqeem (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2024

A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of

218/2022 Const. P. Manzoor Ahmed Maitlo (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2024

A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of

618/2021 Const. P. Rabail Ahmed Jatoi (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2024

A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of

1784/2021 Const. P. Asif Ali (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2024

A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of

701/2022 Const. P. Rashid Ali Soomro (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2024

A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of

1345/2024 Const. P. Muhammad Juman (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

We find that it has not been disputed that working papers were prepared by the respondent- Department about the promotion of the petitioners in BPS-19 much before their retirement, but the matter was delayed without any

4611/2025 Const. P. Masroor Ali Memon (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In light of the above legal position, the repeated supersession of the petitioner, despite judicial directions and absence of subsisting legal impediment, is arbitrary, mala fide in law, and violative of settled principl

4898/2022 Const. P. Hafeez Ullah (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Insofar as the contention that Respondent No. 4???s initial appointment in 1992 was unlawful for lack of recommendation by the Sindh Public Service Commission is concerned, the same is manifestly barred by delay and lach

1422/2023 Const. P. Asad Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Insofar as the contention that Respondent No. 4???s initial appointment in 1992 was unlawful for lack of recommendation by the Sindh Public Service Commission is concerned, the same is manifestly barred by delay and lach

1139/2025 Const. P. M/s Faisal Corp (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Yousuf (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

The Petitioner???s contentions are unsustainable. The Respondents were permanent employees; voluntary abandonment is unproven, and termination without due process was illegal. The Labour Court and Appellate Tribunal prop

7742/2022 Const. P. Bilal Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S I.G of Police Sindh & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of , directing the petitioner to seek a remedy before the Sindh Service Tribunal. This court notes that the petitioner has been pursuing the wrong legal channel since 2

2668/2024 Const. P. SBP Banking Services Corp (Petitioner) V/S Full Bench NIRC and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

The contention that respondent No.4 was merely an employee of a third-party contractor is erroneous, as discussed supra. The Supreme Court in cases such as Fauji Fertilizer Company vs NIRC (2014 PLC (Labour) 10), SSGCL c

1404/2018 Const. P. Abdul Waheed (Petitioner) V/S M/s Movenpick Hotel KHI & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

The authorities relied upon by the respondent are distinguishable on the facts. Those cases relate to situations where delay was unexplained, proceedings were not pursued bona fide, or dismissal orders were duly communic

1621/2025 Const. P. K-Electric Ltd (Petitioner) V/S NIRC and Another (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In the present case, while issuance of a charge sheet per se does not constitute unfair labour practice, the allegation of procedural impropriety and victimization if specifically pleaded and proved could bring the matte

797/2026 Const. P. Syed Javeed Shah (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Since the respondents themselves admit the petitioner???s entitlement and submit that his pension case has already been finalized, no justifiable reason remains for withholding the remaining retirement benefits, particul

1552/2026 Const. P. Danish Saeed (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In view of the above position, without touching the merits of the case and with consent of the parties, this petition is disposed of along with pending application(s) with the direction that the respondent department to

1140/2025 Const. P. M/s Faisal Corp (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Aftab (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

The Petitioner???s contentions are unsustainable. The Respondents were permanent employees; voluntary abandonment is unproven, and termination without due process was illegal. The Labour Court and Appellate Tribunal prop

1747/2018 Const. P. Movenpick Hotek Karachi (Petitioner) V/S S.L.A.T & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

The authorities relied upon by the respondent are distinguishable on the facts. Those cases relate to situations where delay was unexplained, proceedings were not pursued bona fide, or dismissal orders were duly communic

754/2012 Const. P. Syed Zahoor Hussain Zaidi (Petitioner) V/S Presiding Officer, Sindh Labour Court No.V, Karachi and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2012

754/2012 Const. P. Syed Zahoor Hussain Zaidi (Petitioner) V/S Presiding Officer, Sindh Labour Court No.V, Karachi and others (Respondent)

1413/2025 Const. P. Muhammad Sadiq (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In view of the foregoing, this Court is of the considered view the petitioner???s grievance primarily relates to the processing of his revised pension case, which requires formal forwarding by the Education Department t

988/2022 Const. P. Shumaila D/o Rafiq (Petitioner) V/S The SIndh Labour Court No. V, Karachi and Another (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

988/2022 Const. P. Shumaila D/o Rafiq (Petitioner) V/S The SIndh Labour Court No. V, Karachi and Another (Respondent)

Abdul Ghani V Hon'ble Chief Justice through Registrar High Court,

PLC (C.S) 2023 Note 43 · Balochistan High Court · 2023

2023 P L C (C.S.) Note 43 [Balochistan High Court] Before Muhammad Kamran Khan Mulakhail and Nazeer Ahmed Langove, JJ ABDUL GHANI Versus HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE through Registrar High Court Service Appeal No.02

Abdul Ghafoor Kakar V. Honorable Balochistan High Court, through Registrar and others,

PLC (C.S) 2024 1362 · Balochistan High Court · 2024

2024 P L C (C.S.) 1362 [Balochistan High Court] Before Muhammad Kamran Khan Mulakhail and Nazeer Ahmed Langove, JJ ABDUL GHAFOOR KAKAR Versus Honorable BALOCHISTAN HIGH COURT, through Registrar and others Ser

Before Muhammad Kamran Khan Mulakhail, Chairman and Gul Hassan Tareen, Member Nazir Ahmed V. Chief Justice High Court of Balochistan through Registrar and another,

PLC (C.S) 2024 1254 · Balochistan High Court · 2024

2024 P L C (C.S.) 1254 [Appellate Tribunal Balochistan High Court Quetta] Before Muhammad Kamran Khan Mulakhail, Chairman and Gul Hassan Tareen, Member NAZIR AHMED Versus CHIEF JUSTICE HIGH COURT OF BALOCHISTAN

Dr. Sara Jaffer V. Zarak Khan and another,

CLC 2023 77 · Balochistan High Court · 2023

2023 C L C 77 [Balochistan] Before Gul Hassan Tareen, J Dr. SARA JAFFER---- Petitioner Versus ZARAK KHAN and another ----Respondents Civil Revision No.105 of 2022, decided on 10th August, 2022. (a) Balochis

Bibi Khadija V. Pir Muhammad and 3 others,

PLJ 2025 Quetta 144 · Balochistan High Court · 2025

PLJ 2025 Quetta 144 Present: S ARDAR AHMAD HALEEMI , J. BIBI KHADIJA --Petitioner versus PIR MUHAMMAD and 3 others --Respondents C.R. No. 28 of 2023, decided on 8.5.2024. Succession Act, 1925 (XXXIX of 1925) --

Rab Nawaz and others V. Govt. of Balochistan through Chief Secretary and 3 others,

YLR 2017 1779 · Balochistan High Court · 2017

PLJ 2017 Quetta 87 (DB) Present : MUHAMMAD NOOR MESKANZAI , C.J. AND ABDULLAH BALOCH , J. RAB NAWAZ and others --Petitioners versus GOVT. OF BALOCHISTAN through Chief Secretary and 3 others --Respondents C.P. N

Said Akbar  V.  Gateron (Industries) Limited,

PLC 2011 159 · Balochistan High Court · 2011

2011 P L C 159 [Labour Appellate Tribunal Quetta] Before Abdul Qadir Mengal, Member SAID AKBAR Versus Messrs GATERON (INDUSTRIES) LIMITED Labour Appeal No.40 of 2009, decided on 2 9th Novemb

Balochistan Engineering Works Limited V. Jalal Khan,

PLC 2012 161 · Balochistan High Court · 2012

2012 P L C 161 [Balochistan Labour Tribunal] Before Abdul Qadir Mengal, Member BALOCHISTAN ENGINEERING WORKS LIMITED through Deputy Manager and others Versus JALAL KHAN and others Labour Ap

Muhammad Rafique and others V. Bibi Asifa and others,

CLC 2013 1446 · Balochistan High Court · 2013

2013 C L C 1446 [Balochistan] Before Mrs. Syeda Tahira Safdar, J MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE and others ----Petitioners Versus BIBI ASIFA and others ----Respondents Civil Revisions Nos.333 of 2002 and

Jamaluddin v. Chief Justice Balochistan High Court,

PLC (C.S) 2012 1311 · Balochistan High Court · 2012

2012 P L C (C.S.) 1311 [Balochistan High Court] Before Mrs. Syeda Tah ira Safdar and Jamal Khan Mandokhail, JJ JAMAL -UD-DIN Versus CHIEF JUSTICE, BALOCHISTAN HIGH COURT through Registrar Ser

Haji Muhammad Hassan Sherani V. Sardar Babar Khan and 13 others,

CLC 2019 670 · Balochistan High Court · 2019

2019 C L C 670 [Election Tribunal Balochistan] Before Justice Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar, Member Haji MUHAMMAD HASSAN SHERANI ----Petitioner Versus Sardar BABAR KHAN and 13 others ----Respondents Election Peti

Mrs. Tahira Parveen Baloch V. Chief Justice, High Court of Balochistan, Quetta through Registrar,

KLR 2018 Criminal Cases 74 · Balochistan High Court · 2018

2018 P L C (C.S.) 15 [Balochistan High Court] Before Mrs. Syeda Tahira Safdar and Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar, JJ Mrs. TAHIRA PARVEEN BALOCH Versus CHIEF JUSTICE, HIGH COURT OF BALOCHISTAN, QUETTA through Registr

Tahir Humayun and others V. High Court of Balochistan through Registrar and others,

YLR 2015 2349 · Balochistan High Court · 2015

P L D 2016 Balochistan 56 Before Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar and Naeem Akhtar Afghan, JJ TAHIR HUMAYUN and others ---Appellants Versus HIGH COURT OF BALOCHISTAN through Registrar and others ---Respondent

Mst. Razya Ghulam and another V. The General Public,

YLR 2015 2106 · Balochistan High Court · 2015

P L D 2015 Balochistan 127 Before Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar, J Mst. RAZYA GHULAM and another ---Petitioners versus The GENERAL PUBLIC ---Respondent Civil Revision No.75 of 2015, decided on 16th A

Shazia Azeem V. Government of Balochistan through Secretary Education Department, Quetta and 2 others,

PLC (C.S) 2011 1378 · Balochistan High Court · 2011

2012 P L C (C.S.) 648 [Balochistan Service Tribunal] Before Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar, Chairman, Muhammad Naeem Khan Ghalzai and Muhammad Anwar Khan, Members SHAZIA AZEEM Versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOC

Hatim Ameer Baloch V. Shahbana Khuda Bakhsh and another,

PLC (C.S) 2022 535 · Balochistan High Court · 2022

2022 P L C (C.S.) 535 [Balochistan High Court] Before Rozi Khan Barrech, J HATIM AMEER BALOCH Versus SHAHBANA KHUDA BAKHSH and another Succession Appeal No.04 of 2020, decided on 13th August, 2020. Balochis