Labour & Service
183 judgments — showing 101-183
📝 Case Highlights on this topic
Balochistan Engineering Works Limited V. Jalal Khan,Said Akbar V. Gateron (Industries) Limited,Rab Nawaz and others V. Govt. of Balochistan through Chief Secretary and 3 others,See all Case Highlights →3100/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Nusrat and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
The Supreme Court in the case of Nazeer Ahmed Chkrani v Government of Pakistan (2004 SCMR 623), reiterating the principle from Pakistan International Airlines v Nasir Jamal Malik (2001 SCMR 934), established that a promo…
5497/2019 Const. P. Manzoor Ahmed Jokhio (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
The provided rule and Supreme Court precedents establish a civil servant's entitlement to pro-forma promotion. The Supreme Court in Secretary Schools of Education v. Rana Arshad Khan (2012 SCMR 126) granted proforma prom…
1662/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Nawaz Soomro (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
disposed of in the terms of paragraph 35(iii) of the judgment dated 18.03.2016 passed by learned Sindh Service Tribunal maintained by the Honorable Supreme Court vide order dated 26.03.2018 passed in Civil Petition No.26…
4745/2024 Const. P. Tufail Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Another (Respondent)
The Supreme Court's judgment, being in rem, applies to all and can be referenced even if the petitioner was not directly involved in the case. However, the Sindh government incorrectly repatriated the petitioner to a non…
257/2025 Const. P. Zulfiqar Ali Kariro (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
It is well settled that disciplinary proceedings fall within the ambit of expression terms and condition of service of a civil servant, therefore, the jurisdiction of all other courts is barred by the provision of Sindh …
8499/2017 Const. P. Haris Hamid (Petitioner) V/S Port Qasim Authority and Ors (Respondent)
It is well settled that disciplinary proceedings fall within the ambit of expression terms and condition of service of a civil servant, therefore, the jurisdiction of all other courts is barred by the provision of Sindh …
1578/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Saqib (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
departmental proceedings initiated against him as contemplated under Section 3(b)(c) of the Efficiency and Discipline Rules, 1988--as to how this petition is maintainable against departmental proceedings initiated agains…
519/2014 Suit Ali Ahmed Lund (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & ors (Defendant)
"Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1973--- ----R. 12-A---Correction of date of birth in service record---Scope---Contention of plaintiff was that his date of birth was 2-4-1956 instead of 2-4-19…
1344/2024 Const. P. Altaf Hussain Awan (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Coming to the main case, the concept of Proforma Promotion is to remedy the loss sustained by an employee / civil servant on account of denial of promotion upon his/her legitimate turn due to any reason but not a fault o…
1769/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Mazhar Khan and Othes (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
From the above discussion, it is quite clear that a person may be in the service of the Federation/province but for that reason, he cannot be classed as a 'Civil Servant' as defined in the Civil Servants Act 1973, except…
279/2018 Const. P. Jawaid Akhtar (Petitioner) V/S S.L.A.T & Ors (Respondent)
While the Sindh Labour Court had no jurisdiction to adjudicate the petitioners grievance, at the same time, as per the law in force at the material time, the petitioner could have sought his remedy in writ jurisdiction. …
1351/2022 Const. P. Novex Dry Cleaners Hyd (Petitioner) V/S learned Sindh Labour Court Hyderbad & others (Respondent)
Since the discretion was exercised by the Tribunal in condoning the delay within frame of SIRA Act 2013, we cannot replace our discretion with that of the Tribunal as this petition is neither statutory nor efficacious re…
1612/2022 Const. P. Ghulam Shabbir and Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Petition of a civil servant in respect of his posting; not maintainable, whereas, pursuant to Section 10 of the Civil Servant Act, 1973, a Civil Servant cannot claim any specific posting or assignment while discharging h…
149/2013 Const. P. National Refinery Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Mst.Farida Begum & Ors (Respondent)
Once an application under order I rule 10 CPC was filed, respondent No.3/Commissioner assumes the jurisdiction to pass order under the law. Any order that transgresses its authority and jurisdiction is then to be tested …
2341/2010 Const. P. Muhammad Anwer (Petitioner) V/S The federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent)
Basically, the matter pertains to minor penalties which were imposed on the petitioners under the Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, (now repealed), they challenged their reduction into lower grade in…
616/2020 Const. P. M/s K-Electric Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Raees Khan and Others (Respondent)
private respondents were in the employment of the petitioner / K-Electric Limited since years together in their different capacities/posts and obtained ad-interim order dated 05.10.2011 from the National Industrial Relat…
1862/2021 Const. P. Rao Muhammad Azeem (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
disciplinary proceedings initiated against him by the respondent-Police Department--Rule 3(a) (b) of the Sindh Police (Efficiency & Discipline) Rule, 1988--disciplinary proceedings initiated against him which falls withi…
6275/2020 Const. P. Noor Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S D.J South Khi (Respondent)
ACR--Admittedly, the Petitioner is a Civil Servant and his case falls within the ambit of the Sindh Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal which has the exclusive jurisdiction in respect of matters relating to the terms …
615/2020 Const. P. M/s K-Electric Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Aslam Shah and Others (Respondent)
private respondents were in the employment of the petitioner / K-Electric Limited since years together in their different capacities/posts and obtained ad-interim order dated 05.10.2011 from the National Industrial Relat…
4906/2020 Const. P. M/s Sakina Export International Ltd (Petitioner) V/S M. Shair Afzal Khan and Others (Respondent)
The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by…
797/2023 Const. P. Mrs. Fouzia Basharat Samo (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Reliance can be placed on the cases of Chief Secretary, Government of Punjab, Lahore, and others v. Ms. Shamim Usman, 2021 SCMR 1390; Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Establishment, Islamabad v. M.Y. Labib-ur-Re…
4003/2019 Const. P. Munaza Yasmeen and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Learned / Hon (Respondent)
the petitioners have assailed the findings of the learned Single Bench of National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC), Karachi whereby their Grievance Petitions were dismissed with direction to the respondent-Pakista…
848/2021 Const. P. M/s Gerry (Petitioner) V/S NIRC & Ors (Respondent)
M/s. Gerry's Dnata (Pvt.) Ltd.--Adverting to the grounds raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner-company that the NIRC was not competent to summon the Vice President for his appearance in Court, prima facie this…
288/2024 Const. P. Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan (Petitioner) V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others (Respondent)
Touching on the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 of the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is not served, the grievance petition can be dismissed. This is beca…
1832/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
It is well established now that the provision for proforma promotion is not alien or unfamiliar to the civil servant service structure but it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it is lucidly enumerated t…
296/2025 Const. P. Ahmed Raza (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Generally, civil servants have limited avenues to challenge transfers. The appropriate forum for challenging a transfer order is the Service Tribunal. This is because transfer orders are typically considered within the a…
648/2021 Const. P. Asif Ali Unar (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
seeking direction to the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, for transferring Chairman and Controller of Examination, Sindh Public Service Commission--Since the issue is confined to the transfer and posting of responde…
256/2025 Const. P. Hafeezullah (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
It is well-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within 90 days. If the appeal is not decided within that timeframe, he/she can then approach the service tribunal to challenge the original or…
3496/2022 Const. P. Zulfiqar Ali Memon and Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
The Supreme Court in the recent judgment, The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & others Vs Ghulam Shabbir and others, passed in (Civil Appeals Nos.52-K to 71-K of 2022) vide judgment dated 30.12.2025 has observ…
2667/2024 Const. P. State Bank of Pakistan (Petitioner) V/S Full Bench NIRC and Others (Respondent)
The contention that respondent No.4 was merely an employee of a third-party contractor is erroneous, as discussed supra. The Supreme Court in cases such as Fauji Fertilizer Company vs NIRC (2014 PLC (Labour) 10), SSGCL c…
3376/2021 Const. P. Ghulam Mustafa Supro (Petitioner) V/S NBP and Others (Respondent)
In view of the above discussion, the petition is maintainable. The Respondents??? actions restricting pensionary and provident fund benefits to 9 years are illegal, arbitrary, and without lawful authority. The Federal Se…
827/2024 Const. P. Mehboob Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of sindh & others (Respondent)
The right to life, as guaranteed by Article 9 of the Constitution, extends to the right to livelihood. This means that the petitioner has the right to earn a living. However, a respondent department can terminate the ser…
2671/2016 Const. P. Rizwan Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quot…
1346/2024 Const. P. Mumtaz Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
We find that it has not been disputed that working papers were prepared by the respondent- Department about the promotion of the petitioners in BPS-19 much before their retirement, but the matter was delayed without any …
617/2020 Const. P. M/s K-Electric Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Boota and Ors (Respondent)
private respondents were in the employment of the petitioner / K-Electric Limited since years together in their different capacities/posts and obtained ad-interim order dated 05.10.2011 from the National Industrial Relat…
1781/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Moazam (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quot…
2041/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Arsalan and others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quot…
1860/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Hayat (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quot…
4905/2020 Const. P. M/ Sakina Export International Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fayyaz Muhammad and Others (Respondent)
The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by…
4907/2020 Const. P. M/s Sakina Export International Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fareed and Others (Respondent)
The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by…
3274/2017 Const. P. Asif Ali Shah (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quot…
3300/2017 Const. P. Jamshed Qayoom (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quot…
2084/2019 Const. P. Khair Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quot…
3275/2017 Const. P. Asif Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quot…
1724/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Idrees Adil and others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quot…
2065/2019 Const. P. Mashooq Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quot…
2063/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Achar (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quot…
179/2024 Const. P. K-Electric Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Jurisdiction of ombudsman in respect of Service Matters…
2833/2018 Const. P. Ali Raza (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quot…
1333/2025 Const. P. Muhammad Anjum (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
5. The Supreme Court in the recent judgment in the case of Sakhib Zar vs. M/s K-Electric Limited & others ( 2024 SCMR 1722) has held that even 10 days??? absence without leave is quantified as misconduct and on proving t…
821/2023 Const. P. Muhammad Shoaib & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
Since the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of Federation of Pakistan v. Muhammad Nazir, 1998 SCMR 1081, held that the employees of Pakistan Rangers fell within the definition of a civil servant, as their case falls …
289/2024 Const. P. Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan (Petitioner) V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others (Respondent)
Touching on the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 of the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is not served, the grievance petition can be dismissed. This is beca…
183/2022 Const. P. Saddam Hussain Khoso (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
In the case of Muhammad Israrullah Vs Assistant Director, Manpower and others (2005 SCMR 716), the Supreme Court has held that the services of a deputationist could not be terminated as he retains his lien in the parent …
6129/2025 Const. P. Janib (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Insofar as the contention that Respondent No. 4???s initial appointment in 1992 was unlawful for lack of recommendation by the Sindh Public Service Commission is concerned, the same is manifestly barred by delay and lach…
1063/2025 Const. P. Mudasar Jilani (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Given the presented facts and circumstances, the Court concludes that the Petitioner has not established sufficient grounds for intervention. Consequently, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Pet…
5014/2023 Const. P. Abdul Hameed & Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
This review must consider the petitioner's eligibility, the availability of a vacancy, and all other relevant rules. The authority must also adhere to the law established by the Supreme Court in the Maula Bux Shaikh case…
285/2021 Const. P. Abdul Hafeez Indhar (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of …
1105/2025 Const. P. Sohail Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
Civil Servant - Deputation - Repatriation to parent department upon completion of deputation period - Request for extension not a matter of right - Borrowing department within lawful authority to repatriate deputaonist …
4676/2022 Const. P. Dr. Muhammad Ilyas Laghari (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
In conclusion, a retired civil servant can be entitled to a pro forma promotion under the law, but only if he/she can establish that he/she was denied the promotion during their service due to an administrative lapse an…
331/2021 Const. P. Hassnain Ali Mangi (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of …
1037/2022 Const. P. Abdul Razzaque Hakro (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of …
1107/2022 Const. P. Aqeel Hyder Junejo (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of …
44/2022 Const. P. Mustaqeem (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of …
218/2022 Const. P. Manzoor Ahmed Maitlo (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of …
618/2021 Const. P. Rabail Ahmed Jatoi (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of …
1784/2021 Const. P. Asif Ali (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of …
701/2022 Const. P. Rashid Ali Soomro (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of …
1345/2024 Const. P. Muhammad Juman (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
We find that it has not been disputed that working papers were prepared by the respondent- Department about the promotion of the petitioners in BPS-19 much before their retirement, but the matter was delayed without any …
4611/2025 Const. P. Masroor Ali Memon (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)
In light of the above legal position, the repeated supersession of the petitioner, despite judicial directions and absence of subsisting legal impediment, is arbitrary, mala fide in law, and violative of settled principl…
4898/2022 Const. P. Hafeez Ullah (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Insofar as the contention that Respondent No. 4???s initial appointment in 1992 was unlawful for lack of recommendation by the Sindh Public Service Commission is concerned, the same is manifestly barred by delay and lach…
1422/2023 Const. P. Asad Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Insofar as the contention that Respondent No. 4???s initial appointment in 1992 was unlawful for lack of recommendation by the Sindh Public Service Commission is concerned, the same is manifestly barred by delay and lach…
1139/2025 Const. P. M/s Faisal Corp (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Yousuf (Respondent)
The Petitioner???s contentions are unsustainable. The Respondents were permanent employees; voluntary abandonment is unproven, and termination without due process was illegal. The Labour Court and Appellate Tribunal prop…
7742/2022 Const. P. Bilal Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S I.G of Police Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of , directing the petitioner to seek a remedy before the Sindh Service Tribunal. This court notes that the petitioner has been pursuing the wrong legal channel since 2…
2668/2024 Const. P. SBP Banking Services Corp (Petitioner) V/S Full Bench NIRC and Others (Respondent)
The contention that respondent No.4 was merely an employee of a third-party contractor is erroneous, as discussed supra. The Supreme Court in cases such as Fauji Fertilizer Company vs NIRC (2014 PLC (Labour) 10), SSGCL c…
1404/2018 Const. P. Abdul Waheed (Petitioner) V/S M/s Movenpick Hotel KHI & Ors (Respondent)
The authorities relied upon by the respondent are distinguishable on the facts. Those cases relate to situations where delay was unexplained, proceedings were not pursued bona fide, or dismissal orders were duly communic…
1621/2025 Const. P. K-Electric Ltd (Petitioner) V/S NIRC and Another (Respondent)
In the present case, while issuance of a charge sheet per se does not constitute unfair labour practice, the allegation of procedural impropriety and victimization if specifically pleaded and proved could bring the matte…
797/2026 Const. P. Syed Javeed Shah (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Since the respondents themselves admit the petitioner???s entitlement and submit that his pension case has already been finalized, no justifiable reason remains for withholding the remaining retirement benefits, particul…
1552/2026 Const. P. Danish Saeed (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
In view of the above position, without touching the merits of the case and with consent of the parties, this petition is disposed of along with pending application(s) with the direction that the respondent department to …
1140/2025 Const. P. M/s Faisal Corp (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Aftab (Respondent)
The Petitioner???s contentions are unsustainable. The Respondents were permanent employees; voluntary abandonment is unproven, and termination without due process was illegal. The Labour Court and Appellate Tribunal prop…
1747/2018 Const. P. Movenpick Hotek Karachi (Petitioner) V/S S.L.A.T & Ors (Respondent)
The authorities relied upon by the respondent are distinguishable on the facts. Those cases relate to situations where delay was unexplained, proceedings were not pursued bona fide, or dismissal orders were duly communic…
754/2012 Const. P. Syed Zahoor Hussain Zaidi (Petitioner) V/S Presiding Officer, Sindh Labour Court No.V, Karachi and others (Respondent)
754/2012 Const. P. Syed Zahoor Hussain Zaidi (Petitioner) V/S Presiding Officer, Sindh Labour Court No.V, Karachi and others (Respondent)…
1413/2025 Const. P. Muhammad Sadiq (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
In view of the foregoing, this Court is of the considered view the petitioner???s grievance primarily relates to the processing of his revised pension case, which requires formal forwarding by the Education Department t…
988/2022 Const. P. Shumaila D/o Rafiq (Petitioner) V/S The SIndh Labour Court No. V, Karachi and Another (Respondent)
988/2022 Const. P. Shumaila D/o Rafiq (Petitioner) V/S The SIndh Labour Court No. V, Karachi and Another (Respondent)…