1346/2024 Const. P. Mumtaz Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High CourtLabour & Service2025

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)

1346/2024 Const. P. Mumtaz Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Order Date: 24-MAR-25

We find that it has not been disputed that working papers were prepared by the respondent- Department about the promotion of the petitioners in BPS-19 much before their retirement, but the matter was delayed without any justifiable reason, and in the meanwhile, Petitioner attained the age of superannuation. Prima facie they cannot be made to suffer on account of departmental lapse. Additionally, in the matter of civil service, there should not be at all any instance where the competent authority is found to be accommodating any one civil servant for grant of promotion and leaving all other equals and even seniors abandoned.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.

This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

1346/2024 Const. P. Mumtaz Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Related judgments

Engro Fertilizer V. Rohail Muhammad (Unfair Labour Practice Appeal)

Pharmatec Pakistan V. Pharmatec Workers Welfare Union

Shah Faisal V. Nestle Pakistan (Unfair Labor Practice Case)

Implementation of Order of Chief Minister

A terminated employee can be reinstated in service