44/2022 Const. P. Mustaqeem (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court2024

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)

Share on WhatsApp
44/2022 Const. P. Mustaqeem (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent) Sindh High Court Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Order Date: 31-JUL-24 A perusal of the rule, which reflects that in the eventuality of the death of a civil servant during service, it empowered the appointing authority to appoint one of the children of such deceased civil servant in any of the basic pay scales from 11 to 20 and the only requirement provided by the proviso was that the child must possess minimum prescribed qualifications. There was no condition of any examination, test, or interview, and such appointment could be made in any department of the government of Sindh only in case of the death of a civil servant during service. The effect of Rule 10-A was widened when it was substituted by notification No. SOR-1(S&GAD)/2-3/02, dated 15.10.2008.
Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Red Notices against Foreign National Proclaimed Offender

PLJ 2024 Karachi 138 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2024

Judgment on Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act 2012

PLJ 2023 Karachi 124 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2023

Domestic Violence (Prevention and Protection) Act 2013 explained in a Judgment

PLJ 2022 Cr.C. (Note) 154 · Sindh High Court · 2022

Article 140- Cross Examination of a Witness

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020

Re-Examination is more important than Examination in Chief

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020