👋 Welcome, visitor from Columbus, US!

6025/2024 Const. P. Dr. Pritam Das (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High CourtLabour & Service2025

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)

Share on WhatsApp

6025/2024 Const. P. Dr. Pritam Das (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Order Date: 15-JAN-25

So far as the stance of the respondents that pensionary benefits could be withheld on account of the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section 20 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does provide for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension may be withheld or reduced. These include if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension may be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension may be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set by the government. In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Thus, the competent authority of the parent department of the petitioner and the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount of the petitioner and pay the pension amount and other ancillary benefits to the petitioner to which he is entitled under the law within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority of the respondent is also directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Engro Fertilizer V. Rohail Muhammad (Unfair Labour Practice Appeal)

PLJ 2013 · Sindh High Court · 2013

Pharmatec Pakistan V. Pharmatec Workers Welfare Union

PLJ 2013 · Sindh High Court · 2013

Shah Faisal V. Nestle Pakistan (Unfair Labor Practice Case)

PLJ 2013 · Sindh High Court · 2013

Implementation of Order of Chief Minister

Sindh High Court · 2012

A terminated employee can be reinstated in service

Sindh High Court · 2012