Labour & Service

158 judgments — showing 1-100

Condition of Non Counting Contractual Service

PLJ 2024 Tr.C. (Services) 89 · Islamabad High Court · 2024

PLJ 2024 Tr.C. (Services) 89 [Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad] Present: Asim Akram and Muhammad Mushtaq  Jadoon , Members WALI MUHAMMAD--Appellant versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FEDERAL EDUCATION & PROFESSIONAL TRAINI

The Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Services Tribunal (Amendment) Act, 2013

Not specified · 2015

AN ACT further to amend the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Services Tribunal Act, 1974. WHEREAS it is expedient further to amend the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Services Tribunal Act, 1974 (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Act No. I of 1974), for the purp

The Service Tribunals Act, 1973 (Act No. LXX of 1973)

Not specified · 2015

An Act to provide for the establishment of Service Tribunals to exercise jurisdiction in respect of matters relating to the terms and conditions of service of civil servants. WHEREAS it is expedient to provide for the es

Tariq Aziz promotion case on Employment Law

Not specified · 2014

Citation Name  : 2011  PLC  1130     SUPREME-COURT Side Appellant : TARIQ AZIZ-UD-DIN Side Opponent : S. 9---Rules of Business, 1973, Rule. 15 (2) ---Constitution of Pakistan Art.184(3)---Human rights---Promotion from Ba

Key Features and Gaps of the Domestic Workers (Employment Rights) Act, 2013

Not specified · 2014

A bill is under discussion in the Senate of Pakistan by the name of the Domestic Workers (Employment Rights) Act, 2013. The following are some of the key features of this proposed Act:- Features:- - The Purposes of this

The Domestic Workers (Employment Rights) Act, 2013

Not specified · 2014

INTRODUCED ON 20-01-2014 [AS INTRODUCED IN THE SENATE] A BILL to protect the rights of the domestic workers, to regulate their employment and conditions of service and to provide them social security, safety, health faci

THE PUNJAB CIVIL SERVANTS ACT, 1974

Not specified · 2014

(Act VIII of 1974) C O N T E N T S SECTION                                HEADING CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title, application and commencement. 2. Definitions. CHAPTER II TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE OF CIVIL SE

Requirements for registration of Union under Industrial Relations Act 2012 in the context of Domestic Workers

Islamabad High Court · 2014

There is no special law for registration of trade union available for Domestic Workers in Islamabad. However, the only law for the registration of a trade union in Islamabad is captioned above. Let’s discuss some details

Ratification of ILO Conventions by Pakistan

Not specified · 2014

Convention Date Status Note C029 - Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29) 23 Dec 1957 In Force C087 - Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87) 14 Feb 1951 In Force C098 -

The Sacked Employees’ (Reinstatement) Ordinance, 2010

Not specified · 2014

An Ordinance to provide relief to persons in corporation service or autonomous or semi-autonomous bodies or in Government service who were dismissed, removed or terminated from service [Gazette of Pakistan , Extraordinar

Engro Fertilizer V. Rohail Muhammad (Unfair Labour Practice Appeal)

PLJ 2013 · Sindh High Court · 2013

PLJ 2013 Tr.C . (NIRC) 133 [National Industrial Relations Commission, Karachi ] Present: Bashir Ahmed Memon , Member ENGRO FERTILIZER LTD., EMPLOYEES UNION through its General Secretary--Petitioner versus ROHAIL MUHAMMAD

Intra Court Appeal against Bank of Punjab

PLJ 2013 · Islamabad High Court · 2013

PLJ 2013 Islamabad 83 (DB) Present: Iqbal Hameedur Rehman , C.J. and Muhammad Azim Khan Afridi , J. MUHAMMAD AMIN QAMAR--Appellant versus BANK OF PUNJAB , etc.--Respondents I.C.A. No. 44 of 2012, heard on 12.6.2012. Punj

Pharmatec Pakistan V. Pharmatec Workers Welfare Union

PLJ 2013 · Sindh High Court · 2013

PLJ 2013 Tr.C . (NIRC) 100 [National Industrial Relations Commission, Karachi ] Present: Bashir Ahmad Memon , Member PHARMATEC PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI through its Factory Manager--Petitioner versus PHARMATEC WORKER

Shah Faisal V. Nestle Pakistan (Unfair Labor Practice Case)

PLJ 2013 · Sindh High Court · 2013

PLJ 2013 Tr.C . (NIRC) 105 [National Industrial Relations Commission Karachi ] Present: Bashir Ahmed Memon , Member SHAH FAISAL BAIG NIAZI--Petitioner versus NESTLE PAKISTAN LIMITED through its Managing Director & 2 othe

Unfair Labor Practice Petition against PIA

PLJ 2013 · Islamabad High Court · 2013

PLJ 2013 Tr.C . (NIRC) 144 [National Industrial Relations Commission, Islamabad ] Present: Raja Fayyaz Ahmed, Chairman JALIL-UR-REHMAN & others--Petitioners versus PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION through its

Unfair Labour Practice Petition Dismissed against Sui Gas

PLJ 2013 · Lahore High Court · 2013

PLJ 2013 Tr.C . (NIRC) 151 [National Industrial Relations Commission Islamabad ] Present: Baqir Ali Rana , Member ATIF AMIN--Petitioner versus SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LTD. through its Managing Director SNGPL, Lahore &

What is Limitation in case of Declaratory Suits?

PLJ 2013 · Balochistan High Court · 2013

The Limitation is 6 years in all cases where limitation is not given in law. This provision is present in Article 120 of the Limitation Act. The proof of same is present in the following judgment.. PLJ 2013 Quetta 83 Pre

Adverse Remarks Effect in ACR's

PLJ 2013 · Peshawar High Court · 2013

PLJ 2013 Peshawar 260 (DB) Present: Mr. Justice Mian Fasih-ul-Mulk, Chairman and Mrs. Justice Irshad Qaiser, Member. ABDUL RAUF KHAN, PRESENTLY POSTED AS ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSION JUDGE, DIR LOWER--Appellant versus REGIST

Dismissed Employee Can Only Claim Damages

Not specified · 2012

Citation Name : 2011 PLC 1007 SUPREME-COURT Side Appellant : Brig. (R.) SAKHI MARJAN, CEO, PESCO, PESHAWAR Side Opponent : MANAGING DIRECTOR PEPCO, LAHORE Art. 185(3)—Contractual employment—Non-holding of inquiry—Termina

An employee can be forcefully terminated

Supreme Court of Pakistan · 2012

Citation Name : 2009 SCMR 708 SUPREME-COURT Side Appellant : Brig. (R.) SAKHI MARJAN, CEO, PESCO, PESHAWAR Side Opponent : MANAGING DIRECTOR PEPCO, LAHORE Art. 185(3)—Contractual employment—Non-holding of inquiry—Termina

Case of PAF inter college teachers

Not specified · 2012

Citation Name  : 2011  PLC  103     SUPREME-COURT Side Appellant : MUHAMMAD MUBEEN-US-SALAM Side Opponent : FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Defence S. 2(1)(b)---Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S

Conversion of Dismissal into Retirement

Not specified · 2012

Citation Name  : 2011  PLC  656     SUPREME-COURT Side Appellant : MUHAMMAD SHAUKAT Side Opponent : ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LTD. (ZTBL) Art. 212(3)---Civil service---Dismissal from service---Conversion of order of dismissal

Judgement on Forceful retirement of employee

Supreme Court of Pakistan · 2012

Citation Name  : 2011  SCMR  309     SUPREME-COURT Side Appellant : MUHAMMAD SHAUKAT Side Opponent : ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LTD. (ZTBL) Art. 212(3)---Civil service---Dismissal from service---Conversion of order of dismissa

MINIMUM WAGES (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2012

Not specified · 2012

ACT XV OF 2012 MINIMUM WAGES (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2012 An Act, further to amend the Minimum Wages Ordinance, 1961 [Gazette of Punjab, Extraordinary 11th February 2012] No. PAP/Legis-2(90)/2011/528. The Minimum Wages (Amendme

Confession made by accused in police custody is irrelevant

PLJ 2012 Tr.C. (Services) 89 · Lahore High Court · 2012

PLJ 2012 Tr.C. (Services) 89 [Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad] Present: Moazzam Hayat and Mushtaq Malik, Members KARAMAT ALI, EX-DRIVER, WAPDA (POWER) TARBELA TEHSIL AND DISTRICT SWABI--Appellant versus WAPDA through

Principle of Audi alteram partern

Lahore High Court (Rawalpindi Bench) · 2012

PL J 1983 t*tg. (Labour) -13- (punjab labour appellate tribunal, lahore) Before : justice (Rro.) muhammad abdul ghafoor khan Loom, PASTIC EMPLOYEES UNION,  Islamabad— Appellant Versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, Rawalpind

Can a civil servant be terminated?

Not specified · 2012

Citation Name : 2011 PLC 942 SUPREME-COURT Side Appellant : DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, DISTRICT DIR LOWER Side Opponent : ROZI KHAN Art. 212(3)---termination /withdrawal of appointment of civil servant---Civil servan

Dismissal turned into compulsory retirement

Not specified · 2012

Citation Name : 2011 PLC 656 SUPREME-COURT Side Appellant : MUHAMMAD SHAUKAT Side Opponent : ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LTD. (ZTBL) Art. 212(3)---Civil service---Dismissal from service---Conversion of order of dismissal from s

Employer can not lay off employees illegally

Supreme Court of Pakistan · 2012

Citation Name : 2011 SCMR 11 SUPREME-COURT Side Appellant : PAKISTAN SYNTHETICS LIMITED Side Opponent : WAQAR AHMED Ss. 12 & 13---Retrenchment or lay off---Economy measures---Proof---Services of employees were terminated

Teachers lost case against PAF

Not specified · 2012

Citation Name : 2011 PLC 103 SUPREME-COURT Side Appellant : MUHAMMAD MUBEEN-US-SALAM Side Opponent : FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Defence S. 2(1)(b)---Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S. 4---C

Can the Prohibited Bore License be awarded to private persons?

PLJ 2008 SC 1001 · Peshawar High Court · 2008

PLJ 2008 SC 1001 [Appellate Jurisdiction] Present: Abdul Hameed Dogar, CJ, Ijaz-ul-Hassan & Ch. Ejaz Yousaf, JJ. MUHAMMAD JAMIL KHAN--Appellant versus PESHAWAR HIGH COURT, PESHAWAR through the Registrar and another--Resp

Can a respondent be deleted to not to be a party?

PLJ 2005 Karachi 21 · Sindh High Court · 2005

PLJ 2005 Karachi 21 [Sindh Circuit Hyderabad] Present: Muhammad Mujibullah Siddiqui, J. ARMY WELFARE SUGAR MILLS, WORKERS UNION through its GENERAL SECRETARY--Applicant versus REGISTRAR TRADE UNIONS, HYDERABAD and 2 othe

Are the employees of Statutory Corporation entitled for promotion?

PLJ 2004 Tr. C. (Services) 261 · Islamabad High Court · 2004

PLJ 2004 Tr. C. (Services) 261 [Federal Service Tribunal Islamabad ] Present: nazar muhammad shaikh and hassan raza pasha, members MUHAMMAD RAFIQ, TELEPHONE OPERATOR, WORKING UNDER DIVISIONAL ENGINEER PHONES MAINTENANCE

Concept of Independence of Judiciary in Pakistan

PLJ 2002 SC 120 · Lahore High Court · 2002

PLJ 2002 SC 120 [Appellate Jurisdiction] Present: iftikhar muhammad chaudhry, qazi muhammad parooq and hamid ali mirza, JJ. LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE through REGISTRAR-Appellant versus K.M. SOHEL-Respondent C.As. Nos. 16

Acting Charge according to NHA Appointment and Promotion Rules 1995

PLJ 2000 Tr.C. (Services) 102 · Islamabad High Court · 2000

PLJ 2000 Tr.C. (Services) 102 [Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad ] Present: MUHAMMAD AYUB KHAN AND SYED MUHAMMAD ZAFAR BABAR, MEMBERS GHULAM NABI MORAI etc.~Appellants versus CHAIRMAN NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY and oth

Re-Examination in Grievance Petition

PLJ 1997 Tr.C. (Labour) 171 · Lahore High Court · 1997

PLJ 1997 Tr.C. (Labour) 171 [Punjab Labour Appellate Tribunal, Lahore ] Present: JUSTICE (RETD.) MIAN GHULAM AHMAD, CHAIRMAN DIRECTOR ADMINISTRATION and SECURITY WATER & SANITATION AGENCY F.D.A. FAISALABAD-Petitioner ver

3100/2016 Const. P. Ms. Surriya Kanwal (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

whether the resignation once tendered by the civil servant voluntarily and accepted by the competent authority and communicated to him/her could be considered to be final and cannot be revoked afterwards?

7678/2015 Const. P. HBL (Petitioner) V/S Full Bench NIRC and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

HBL--back benefits--Through this petition, the petitioner-Habib Bank Limited (HBL) is praying for setting aside the order dated 28.10.2015 passed by the Full Bench of National Industrial Relations Commission Islamabad (N

1015/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Saleem Jehangir (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

It is also important to note that neither seniority nor promotion is the vested right of a civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion could be claimed or granted without the actual length of servic

185/2021 Const. P. Syeda Asia Rizvi (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2023

Whether a divorced daughter of a civil servant can claim pensionary benefitsd

6344/2019 Const. P. Dr. Jagdesh & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

Group insurance to employees of Government of Sindh, the Sindh Civil Servants Welfare Fund Ordinance 1979 and Sindh Civil Servants Welfare Fund Rules, 1980, Boards for administration of the Funds, State life insurance co

4965/2023 Const. P. Saleem Khan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

It is well-settled that while considering the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has to consider the merit of all the eligible candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion

2308/2020 Const. P. Zubair Javed (Petitioner) V/S Speaker Sindh Assembly & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2022

A person may be in the service of the Federation/province but for that reason, he cannot be classed as a 'Civil Servant' as defined in the Civil Servants Act 1973, except the employees whose terms and conditions of servi

457/2021 Const. P. M/S Rafique Ahmed & Co (Petitioner) V/S The Registrar of Trade Union Govt Sindh & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

Sind Industrial Relations Act, 2013. Maintainability of petition by Employer against order of Registrar Trade Union passed under section 9(10). Held Yes.

89/2022 Const. P. Sikandar Ali & Others (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2022

Service matters. No vested right concept in promotion policy. Government can amend the same, if deemed appropriate.

6261/2020 Const. P. SSGC Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Registrar of Trade Union NIRC and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

M/s. Sui Southern Gas Company Limited ("SSGC"), has sought enforcement of the guidelines provided by the Honourable Supreme Court of Pakistan in its order dated 11.03.2020 passed in Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.

4048/2012 Const. P. M/s. Dalda Foods(Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

We find that the private respondents were deprived of their due process rights. They were not confronted with the material based on which their services were verbally terminated. Even otherwise, the process followed by t

6222/2023 Const. P. Dr. Abdul Shakoor Abro (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2024

firstly section 10 of the Civil Servant Act 1973 provides that every civil servant shall be liable to serve within and outside Pakistan under the Federal Government or any Provincial Government, whereas Rule 20-A of the

646/2014 Const. P. Engro Foods Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Registrar of Trade Union and another (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2022

"Industrial Relations. Challenge to registration of trade union re trans-provincial establishment".

3502/2021 Const. P. Syed Babar Hashmi (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

We do not agree with the statement of the learned counsel for the Petitioner on the aforesaid assertions for the simple reason that compulsory retirement from service is a major penalty under service jurisprudence and fa

1299/2022 Const. P. Mujahid Ali Lund (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2024

Perusal of the substituted Rule 10-A reflects that with widening its scope, certain conditions were also imposed. Earlier the benefit of such rule was provided only to the children of the deceased civil servant who died

-1049/2024 Suit Muhammad Nasser Janjua & others (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & another (Defendant)

Sindh High Court · 2024

Civil Courts, including a Judge (in Chambers) of High Court of Sindh, exercising jurisdiction on the original side as a civil court under C.P.C. cannot entertain a civil suit of a civil servant relating to the terms and

3764/2022 Const. P. Dr. Muhammad Tariq Khan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2024

Applicability of Section 10 of Civil Servant Act, 1973, appointment of a junior officer when no suitable person is available for promotion; held No; appointment set-aside

1357/2022 Const. P. Altaf Hussain Khuhro & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2022

Petition of a civil servant in respect of his posting; not maintainable, whereas, pursuant to Section 10 of the Civil Servant Act, 1973, a Civil Servant cannot claim any specific posting or assignment while discharging h

649/2013 Const. P. Mst. Sahib Khatoon (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2019

Petitioner being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the non -action by the alleged Contemnors, filed an Application (CMA 14152/2015)under Article 204 of the Constitution, praying therein to initiate the Contempt Proceedi

6025/2024 Const. P. Dr. Pritam Das (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

So far as the stance of the respondents that pensionary benefits could be withheld on account of the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section 20 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals wit

1215/2020 Const. P. Bansi Lal Malhi & Another (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

the common grievance of the Petitioners is against the issuance of notifications dated 09.12.2019 and 26.2.2021 by the respondent-Establishment Division, whereby the direction was given to the Police Service of Pakistan

150/2025 Const. P. Dr.Tariq Hasan Memon (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

WAPDA Employees: Exclusive Jurisdiction of Federal Service Tribunal under Article 212 of the Constitution

339/2025 Const. P. Munawar Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

It is well settled that disciplinary proceedings fall within the ambit of expression terms and conditions of service of a civil servant, therefore, the jurisdiction of all other courts is barred by the provision of Sindh

3100/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Nusrat and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

The Supreme Court in the case of Nazeer Ahmed Chkrani v Government of Pakistan (2004 SCMR 623), reiterating the principle from Pakistan International Airlines v Nasir Jamal Malik (2001 SCMR 934), established that a promo

5497/2019 Const. P. Manzoor Ahmed Jokhio (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

The provided rule and Supreme Court precedents establish a civil servant's entitlement to pro-forma promotion. The Supreme Court in Secretary Schools of Education v. Rana Arshad Khan (2012 SCMR 126) granted proforma prom

1662/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Nawaz Soomro (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

disposed of in the terms of paragraph 35(iii) of the judgment dated 18.03.2016 passed by learned Sindh Service Tribunal maintained by the Honorable Supreme Court vide order dated 26.03.2018 passed in Civil Petition No.26

4745/2024 Const. P. Tufail Ahmed Soomro (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Another (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2024

The Supreme Court's judgment, being in rem, applies to all and can be referenced even if the petitioner was not directly involved in the case. However, the Sindh government incorrectly repatriated the petitioner to a non

257/2025 Const. P. Zulfiqar Ali Kariro (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

It is well settled that disciplinary proceedings fall within the ambit of expression terms and condition of service of a civil servant, therefore, the jurisdiction of all other courts is barred by the provision of Sindh

8499/2017 Const. P. Haris Hamid (Petitioner) V/S Port Qasim Authority and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

It is well settled that disciplinary proceedings fall within the ambit of expression terms and condition of service of a civil servant, therefore, the jurisdiction of all other courts is barred by the provision of Sindh

1578/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Saqib (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

departmental proceedings initiated against him as contemplated under Section 3(b)(c) of the Efficiency and Discipline Rules, 1988--as to how this petition is maintainable against departmental proceedings initiated agains

519/2014 Suit Ali Ahmed Lund (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & ors (Defendant)

Sindh High Court · 2014

"Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules, 1973--- ----R. 12-A---Correction of date of birth in service record---Scope---Contention of plaintiff was that his date of birth was 2-4-1956 instead of 2-4-19

1344/2024 Const. P. Altaf Hussain Awan (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

Coming to the main case, the concept of Proforma Promotion is to remedy the loss sustained by an employee / civil servant on account of denial of promotion upon his/her legitimate turn due to any reason but not a fault o

1769/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Mazhar Khan and Othes (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

From the above discussion, it is quite clear that a person may be in the service of the Federation/province but for that reason, he cannot be classed as a 'Civil Servant' as defined in the Civil Servants Act 1973, except

279/2018 Const. P. Jawaid Akhtar (Petitioner) V/S S.L.A.T & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

While the Sindh Labour Court had no jurisdiction to adjudicate the petitioners grievance, at the same time, as per the law in force at the material time, the petitioner could have sought his remedy in writ jurisdiction.

1351/2022 Const. P. Novex Dry Cleaners Hyd (Petitioner) V/S learned Sindh Labour Court Hyderbad & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2022

Since the discretion was exercised by the Tribunal in condoning the delay within frame of SIRA Act 2013, we cannot replace our discretion with that of the Tribunal as this petition is neither statutory nor efficacious re

1612/2022 Const. P. Ghulam Shabbir and Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2022

Petition of a civil servant in respect of his posting; not maintainable, whereas, pursuant to Section 10 of the Civil Servant Act, 1973, a Civil Servant cannot claim any specific posting or assignment while discharging h

149/2013 Const. P. National Refinery Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Mst.Farida Begum & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2017

Once an application under order I rule 10 CPC was filed, respondent No.3/Commissioner assumes the jurisdiction to pass order under the law. Any order that transgresses its authority and jurisdiction is then to be tested

2341/2010 Const. P. Muhammad Anwer (Petitioner) V/S The federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2020

Basically, the matter pertains to minor penalties which were imposed on the petitioners under the Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, (now repealed), they challenged their reduction into lower grade in

616/2020 Const. P. M/s K-Electric Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Raees Khan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2020

private respondents were in the employment of the petitioner / K-Electric Limited since years together in their different capacities/posts and obtained ad-interim order dated 05.10.2011 from the National Industrial Relat

1862/2021 Const. P. Rao Muhammad Azeem (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

disciplinary proceedings initiated against him by the respondent-Police Department--Rule 3(a) (b) of the Sindh Police (Efficiency & Discipline) Rule, 1988--disciplinary proceedings initiated against him which falls withi

6275/2020 Const. P. Noor Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S D.J South Khi (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2020

ACR--Admittedly, the Petitioner is a Civil Servant and his case falls within the ambit of the Sindh Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal which has the exclusive jurisdiction in respect of matters relating to the terms

615/2020 Const. P. M/s K-Electric Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Aslam Shah and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2020

private respondents were in the employment of the petitioner / K-Electric Limited since years together in their different capacities/posts and obtained ad-interim order dated 05.10.2011 from the National Industrial Relat

4906/2020 Const. P. M/s Sakina Export International Ltd (Petitioner) V/S M. Shair Afzal Khan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2020

The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by

797/2023 Const. P. Mrs. Fouzia Basharat Samo (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

Reliance can be placed on the cases of Chief Secretary, Government of Punjab, Lahore, and others v. Ms. Shamim Usman, 2021 SCMR 1390; Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Establishment, Islamabad v. M.Y. Labib-ur-Re

4003/2019 Const. P. Munaza Yasmeen and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Learned / Hon (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

the petitioners have assailed the findings of the learned Single Bench of National Industrial Relations Commission (NIRC), Karachi whereby their Grievance Petitions were dismissed with direction to the respondent-Pakista

848/2021 Const. P. M/s Gerry (Petitioner) V/S NIRC & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

M/s. Gerry's Dnata (Pvt.) Ltd.--Adverting to the grounds raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner-company that the NIRC was not competent to summon the Vice President for his appearance in Court, prima facie this

288/2024 Const. P. Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan (Petitioner) V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

Touching on the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 of the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is not served, the grievance petition can be dismissed. This is beca

1832/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

It is well established now that the provision for proforma promotion is not alien or unfamiliar to the civil servant service structure but it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it is lucidly enumerated t

296/2025 Const. P. Ahmed Raza (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

Generally, civil servants have limited avenues to challenge transfers. The appropriate forum for challenging a transfer order is the Service Tribunal. This is because transfer orders are typically considered within the a

648/2021 Const. P. Asif Ali Unar (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

seeking direction to the Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, for transferring Chairman and Controller of Examination, Sindh Public Service Commission--Since the issue is confined to the transfer and posting of responde

256/2025 Const. P. Hafeezullah (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

It is well-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within 90 days. If the appeal is not decided within that timeframe, he/she can then approach the service tribunal to challenge the original or

3496/2022 Const. P. Zulfiqar Ali Memon and Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

The Supreme Court in the recent judgment, The Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary & others Vs Ghulam Shabbir and others, passed in (Civil Appeals Nos.52-K to 71-K of 2022) vide judgment dated 30.12.2025 has observ

2667/2024 Const. P. State Bank of Pakistan (Petitioner) V/S Full Bench NIRC and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

The contention that respondent No.4 was merely an employee of a third-party contractor is erroneous, as discussed supra. The Supreme Court in cases such as Fauji Fertilizer Company vs NIRC (2014 PLC (Labour) 10), SSGCL c

3376/2021 Const. P. Ghulam Mustafa Supro (Petitioner) V/S NBP and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In view of the above discussion, the petition is maintainable. The Respondents??? actions restricting pensionary and provident fund benefits to 9 years are illegal, arbitrary, and without lawful authority. The Federal Se

827/2024 Const. P. Mehboob Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2024

The right to life, as guaranteed by Article 9 of the Constitution, extends to the right to livelihood. This means that the petitioner has the right to earn a living. However, a respondent department can terminate the ser

2671/2016 Const. P. Rizwan Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2019

Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quot

1346/2024 Const. P. Mumtaz Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

We find that it has not been disputed that working papers were prepared by the respondent- Department about the promotion of the petitioners in BPS-19 much before their retirement, but the matter was delayed without any

617/2020 Const. P. M/s K-Electric Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Boota and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2020

private respondents were in the employment of the petitioner / K-Electric Limited since years together in their different capacities/posts and obtained ad-interim order dated 05.10.2011 from the National Industrial Relat

1781/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Moazam (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2019

Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quot

2041/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Arsalan and others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2019

Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quot

1860/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Hayat (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2019

Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quot

4905/2020 Const. P. M/ Sakina Export International Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fayyaz Muhammad and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2020

The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by

4907/2020 Const. P. M/s Sakina Export International Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fareed and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2020

The main ground agitated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents were not their employees but the employees of third party contractors. This plea is not tenable in the light of judgment rendered by

3274/2017 Const. P. Asif Ali Shah (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2019

Learned counsel for the Petitioners while laying emphasis on Rule10- A & 11-A of Sindh Civil Servant (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer Rules, 1974) argued that the Petitioners are entitled to be appointed on son quot