👋 Welcome, visitor from Columbus, US!

Labour & Service

183 judgments — showing 1-100

📝 Case Highlights on this topic

Balochistan Engineering Works Limited V. Jalal Khan,Said Akbar  V.  Gateron (Industries) Limited,Rab Nawaz and others V. Govt. of Balochistan through Chief Secretary and 3 others,See all Case Highlights →

Condition of Non Counting Contractual Service

PLJ 2024 Tr.C. (Services) 89 · Islamabad High Court · 2024

PLJ 2024 Tr.C. (Services) 89 [Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad] Present: Asim Akram and Muhammad Mushtaq  Jadoon , Members WALI MUHAMMAD--Appellant versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FEDERAL EDUCATION & PROFESSIONAL TRAINI

The Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Services Tribunal (Amendment) Act, 2013

Not specified · 2015

AN ACT further to amend the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Services Tribunal Act, 1974. WHEREAS it is expedient further to amend the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Services Tribunal Act, 1974 (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Act No. I of 1974), for the purp

The Service Tribunals Act, 1973 (Act No. LXX of 1973)

Not specified · 2015

An Act to provide for the establishment of Service Tribunals to exercise jurisdiction in respect of matters relating to the terms and conditions of service of civil servants. WHEREAS it is expedient to provide for the es

Tariq Aziz promotion case on Employment Law

Not specified · 2014

Citation Name  : 2011  PLC  1130     SUPREME-COURT Side Appellant : TARIQ AZIZ-UD-DIN Side Opponent : S. 9---Rules of Business, 1973, Rule. 15 (2) ---Constitution of Pakistan Art.184(3)---Human rights---Promotion from Ba

Key Features and Gaps of the Domestic Workers (Employment Rights) Act, 2013

Not specified · 2014

A bill is under discussion in the Senate of Pakistan by the name of the Domestic Workers (Employment Rights) Act, 2013. The following are some of the key features of this proposed Act:- Features:- - The Purposes of this

The Domestic Workers (Employment Rights) Act, 2013

Not specified · 2014

INTRODUCED ON 20-01-2014 [AS INTRODUCED IN THE SENATE] A BILL to protect the rights of the domestic workers, to regulate their employment and conditions of service and to provide them social security, safety, health faci

THE PUNJAB CIVIL SERVANTS ACT, 1974

Not specified · 2014

(Act VIII of 1974) C O N T E N T S SECTION                                HEADING CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title, application and commencement. 2. Definitions. CHAPTER II TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE OF CIVIL SE

Requirements for registration of Union under Industrial Relations Act 2012 in the context of Domestic Workers

Islamabad High Court · 2014

There is no special law for registration of trade union available for Domestic Workers in Islamabad. However, the only law for the registration of a trade union in Islamabad is captioned above. Let’s discuss some details

Ratification of ILO Conventions by Pakistan

Not specified · 2014

Convention Date Status Note C029 - Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29) 23 Dec 1957 In Force C087 - Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87) 14 Feb 1951 In Force C098 -

The Sacked Employees’ (Reinstatement) Ordinance, 2010

Not specified · 2014

An Ordinance to provide relief to persons in corporation service or autonomous or semi-autonomous bodies or in Government service who were dismissed, removed or terminated from service [Gazette of Pakistan , Extraordinar

Engro Fertilizer V. Rohail Muhammad (Unfair Labour Practice Appeal)

PLJ 2013 · Sindh High Court · 2013

PLJ 2013 Tr.C . (NIRC) 133 [National Industrial Relations Commission, Karachi ] Present: Bashir Ahmed Memon , Member ENGRO FERTILIZER LTD., EMPLOYEES UNION through its General Secretary--Petitioner versus ROHAIL MUHAMMAD

Intra Court Appeal against Bank of Punjab

PLJ 2013 · Islamabad High Court · 2013

PLJ 2013 Islamabad 83 (DB) Present: Iqbal Hameedur Rehman , C.J. and Muhammad Azim Khan Afridi , J. MUHAMMAD AMIN QAMAR--Appellant versus BANK OF PUNJAB , etc.--Respondents I.C.A. No. 44 of 2012, heard on 12.6.2012. Punj

Pharmatec Pakistan V. Pharmatec Workers Welfare Union

PLJ 2013 · Sindh High Court · 2013

PLJ 2013 Tr.C . (NIRC) 100 [National Industrial Relations Commission, Karachi ] Present: Bashir Ahmad Memon , Member PHARMATEC PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI through its Factory Manager--Petitioner versus PHARMATEC WORKER

Shah Faisal V. Nestle Pakistan (Unfair Labor Practice Case)

PLJ 2013 · Sindh High Court · 2013

PLJ 2013 Tr.C . (NIRC) 105 [National Industrial Relations Commission Karachi ] Present: Bashir Ahmed Memon , Member SHAH FAISAL BAIG NIAZI--Petitioner versus NESTLE PAKISTAN LIMITED through its Managing Director & 2 othe

Unfair Labor Practice Petition against PIA

PLJ 2013 · Islamabad High Court · 2013

PLJ 2013 Tr.C . (NIRC) 144 [National Industrial Relations Commission, Islamabad ] Present: Raja Fayyaz Ahmed, Chairman JALIL-UR-REHMAN & others--Petitioners versus PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION through its

Unfair Labour Practice Petition Dismissed against Sui Gas

PLJ 2013 · Lahore High Court · 2013

PLJ 2013 Tr.C . (NIRC) 151 [National Industrial Relations Commission Islamabad ] Present: Baqir Ali Rana , Member ATIF AMIN--Petitioner versus SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LTD. through its Managing Director SNGPL, Lahore &

What is Limitation in case of Declaratory Suits?

PLJ 2013 · Balochistan High Court · 2013

The Limitation is 6 years in all cases where limitation is not given in law. This provision is present in Article 120 of the Limitation Act. The proof of same is present in the following judgment.. PLJ 2013 Quetta 83 Pre

Adverse Remarks Effect in ACR's

PLJ 2013 · Peshawar High Court · 2013

PLJ 2013 Peshawar 260 (DB) Present: Mr. Justice Mian Fasih-ul-Mulk, Chairman and Mrs. Justice Irshad Qaiser, Member. ABDUL RAUF KHAN, PRESENTLY POSTED AS ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSION JUDGE, DIR LOWER--Appellant versus REGIST

Dismissed Employee Can Only Claim Damages

Not specified · 2012

Citation Name : 2011 PLC 1007 SUPREME-COURT Side Appellant : Brig. (R.) SAKHI MARJAN, CEO, PESCO, PESHAWAR Side Opponent : MANAGING DIRECTOR PEPCO, LAHORE Art. 185(3)—Contractual employment—Non-holding of inquiry—Termina

An employee can be forcefully terminated

Supreme Court of Pakistan · 2012

Citation Name : 2009 SCMR 708 SUPREME-COURT Side Appellant : Brig. (R.) SAKHI MARJAN, CEO, PESCO, PESHAWAR Side Opponent : MANAGING DIRECTOR PEPCO, LAHORE Art. 185(3)—Contractual employment—Non-holding of inquiry—Termina

Implementation of Order of Chief Minister

Sindh High Court · 2012

Citation Name : 2002 PLD 728 SUPREME-COURT Side Appellant : IMDAD MAGSI Side Opponent : KARACHI WATER AND SEWERAGE BOARD —-Rr.4(a) & 6(b)(c) —Karachi Water and Sewerage Board Employees (General Conditions of Services)

Case of PAF inter college teachers

Not specified · 2012

Citation Name  : 2011  PLC  103     SUPREME-COURT Side Appellant : MUHAMMAD MUBEEN-US-SALAM Side Opponent : FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Defence S. 2(1)(b)---Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S

Conversion of Dismissal into Retirement

Not specified · 2012

Citation Name  : 2011  PLC  656     SUPREME-COURT Side Appellant : MUHAMMAD SHAUKAT Side Opponent : ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LTD. (ZTBL) Art. 212(3)---Civil service---Dismissal from service---Conversion of order of dismissal

Disabled persons act amended recently

Not specified · 2012

ACT XIII OF 2012 DISABLED PERSONS (EMPLOYMENT AND REHABILITATION) (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2012 An Act, further to amend the Disabled Persons (Employment & Rehabilitation) Ordinance, 1981. [Gazette of Punjab, Extraordinary, 11th

FACTORIES (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2012

Not specified · 2012

ACT XIV OF 2012 FACTORIES (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2012 An Act, further to amend the Factories Act, 1934 [Gazette of Punjab, Extraordinary, 11th February 2012] No. PAP/Legis-2(89)/2011/527.--The Factories (Amendment) Bill, 2011,

Judgement on Forceful retirement of employee

Supreme Court of Pakistan · 2012

Citation Name  : 2011  SCMR  309     SUPREME-COURT Side Appellant : MUHAMMAD SHAUKAT Side Opponent : ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LTD. (ZTBL) Art. 212(3)---Civil service---Dismissal from service---Conversion of order of dismissa

MINIMUM WAGES (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2012

Not specified · 2012

ACT XV OF 2012 MINIMUM WAGES (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2012 An Act, further to amend the Minimum Wages Ordinance, 1961 [Gazette of Punjab, Extraordinary 11th February 2012] No. PAP/Legis-2(90)/2011/528. The Minimum Wages (Amendme

Confession made by accused in police custody is irrelevant

PLJ 2012 Tr.C. (Services) 89 · Lahore High Court · 2012

PLJ 2012 Tr.C. (Services) 89 [Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad] Present: Moazzam Hayat and Mushtaq Malik, Members KARAMAT ALI, EX-DRIVER, WAPDA (POWER) TARBELA TEHSIL AND DISTRICT SWABI--Appellant versus WAPDA through

Principle of Audi alteram partern

Lahore High Court (Rawalpindi Bench) · 2012

PL J 1983 t*tg. (Labour) -13- (punjab labour appellate tribunal, lahore) Before : justice (Rro.) muhammad abdul ghafoor khan Loom, PASTIC EMPLOYEES UNION,  Islamabad— Appellant Versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, Rawalpind

Private Respondent should not be treated as a class

Not specified · 2012

Calcutta High Court: The Court rejected the Contention that only because there were no persons in the department, therefore, the private respondent should have been treated as a “class” or “category of persons” for th

A terminated employee can be reinstated in service

Sindh High Court · 2012

A wrongfully terminated employee can be reinstated on the precedent of this judgment of Sindh Services Tribunal. Citation Name : 2011 PLC 526 SERVICE-TRIBUNAL-SINDH Side Appellant : GOHRAM SOOMRO Side Opponent : SECRETAR

Can a civil servant be terminated?

Not specified · 2012

Citation Name : 2011 PLC 942 SUPREME-COURT Side Appellant : DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, DISTRICT DIR LOWER Side Opponent : ROZI KHAN Art. 212(3)---termination /withdrawal of appointment of civil servant---Civil servan

Dismissal turned into compulsory retirement

Not specified · 2012

Citation Name : 2011 PLC 656 SUPREME-COURT Side Appellant : MUHAMMAD SHAUKAT Side Opponent : ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LTD. (ZTBL) Art. 212(3)---Civil service---Dismissal from service---Conversion of order of dismissal from s

Doctrine of Master and Servant is Un-Islamic

Not specified · 2012

Citation Name  : 2000  PSC  796     LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Side Appellant : MUHAMMAD ASHRAF Side Opponent : DIRECTOR-GENERAL, MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, MULTAN Master and Servant ---- law of master and servant, is a

Employer can not lay off employees illegally

Supreme Court of Pakistan · 2012

Citation Name : 2011 SCMR 11 SUPREME-COURT Side Appellant : PAKISTAN SYNTHETICS LIMITED Side Opponent : WAQAR AHMED Ss. 12 & 13---Retrenchment or lay off---Economy measures---Proof---Services of employees were terminated

Excellent Judgment on Rules of Business for Promotion

Not specified · 2012

Citation Name : 2011 PLC 1130 SUPREME-COURT Side Appellant : TARIQ AZIZ-UD-DIN Side Opponent : S. 9---Rules of Business, 1973, Rule. 15 (2) ---Constitution of Pakistan Art.184(3)---Human rights---Promotion from Basic Sca

Honorarium in Law

Not specified · 2012

This judgement defines the work honorarium in the eyes of law. A wonderful judgment worth studying... Citation Name  : 2007  PLD  16     SUPREME-COURT Side Appellant : Mirza MUHAMMAD TUFAIL Side Opponent : DISTRICT RETUR

Teachers lost case against PAF

Not specified · 2012

Citation Name : 2011 PLC 103 SUPREME-COURT Side Appellant : MUHAMMAD MUBEEN-US-SALAM Side Opponent : FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Defence S. 2(1)(b)---Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S. 4---C

Termination from service should be judicious

Not specified · 2012

Citation Name : 2011 PLC 1017 SUPREME-COURT Side Appellant : ABDUL WAHAB Side Opponent : SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN termination of service---No one could be allowed, irrespective of the fact who was who to act

Petition of leave to Appeal

SCMR  1292     SUPREME-COURT · Islamabad High Court · 2012

Citation Name  : 2012  SCMR  1292     SUPREME-COURT Side Appellant : ABRAR-UL-HAQ SHAMI, DEPUTY SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION, ISLAMABAD Side Opponent : FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Overseas P

Can the Prohibited Bore License be awarded to private persons?

PLJ 2008 SC 1001 · Peshawar High Court · 2008

PLJ 2008 SC 1001 [Appellate Jurisdiction] Present: Abdul Hameed Dogar, CJ, Ijaz-ul-Hassan & Ch. Ejaz Yousaf, JJ. MUHAMMAD JAMIL KHAN--Appellant versus PESHAWAR HIGH COURT, PESHAWAR through the Registrar and another--Resp

Can a respondent be deleted to not to be a party?

PLJ 2005 Karachi 21 · Sindh High Court · 2005

PLJ 2005 Karachi 21 [Sindh Circuit Hyderabad] Present: Muhammad Mujibullah Siddiqui, J. ARMY WELFARE SUGAR MILLS, WORKERS UNION through its GENERAL SECRETARY--Applicant versus REGISTRAR TRADE UNIONS, HYDERABAD and 2 othe

Are the employees of Statutory Corporation entitled for promotion?

PLJ 2004 Tr. C. (Services) 261 · Islamabad High Court · 2004

PLJ 2004 Tr. C. (Services) 261 [Federal Service Tribunal Islamabad ] Present: nazar muhammad shaikh and hassan raza pasha, members MUHAMMAD RAFIQ, TELEPHONE OPERATOR, WORKING UNDER DIVISIONAL ENGINEER PHONES MAINTENANCE

Concept of Independence of Judiciary in Pakistan

PLJ 2002 SC 120 · Lahore High Court · 2002

PLJ 2002 SC 120 [Appellate Jurisdiction] Present: iftikhar muhammad chaudhry, qazi muhammad parooq and hamid ali mirza, JJ. LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE through REGISTRAR-Appellant versus K.M. SOHEL-Respondent C.As. Nos. 16

Obligation of WAPDA for medical treatment

SCMR 2001 · Supreme Court of Pakistan · 2001

Citation Name : 2011 SCMR 2001 SUPREME-COURT Side Appellant : CHAIRMAN, WAPDA Side Opponent : Syed MUBARAK ALI ZAIDI Rules 2 & 17--- Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 185(3)--- Medical treatment of permanently disabled son

Acting Charge according to NHA Appointment and Promotion Rules 1995

PLJ 2000 Tr.C. (Services) 102 · Islamabad High Court · 2000

PLJ 2000 Tr.C. (Services) 102 [Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad ] Present: MUHAMMAD AYUB KHAN AND SYED MUHAMMAD ZAFAR BABAR, MEMBERS GHULAM NABI MORAI etc.~Appellants versus CHAIRMAN NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY and oth

Re-Examination in Grievance Petition

PLJ 1997 Tr.C. (Labour) 171 · Lahore High Court · 1997

PLJ 1997 Tr.C. (Labour) 171 [Punjab Labour Appellate Tribunal, Lahore ] Present: JUSTICE (RETD.) MIAN GHULAM AHMAD, CHAIRMAN DIRECTOR ADMINISTRATION and SECURITY WATER & SANITATION AGENCY F.D.A. FAISALABAD-Petitioner ver

Abdul Ghani V Hon'ble Chief Justice through Registrar High Court,

PLC (C.S) 2023 Note 43 · Balochistan High Court · 2023

2023 P L C (C.S.) Note 43 [Balochistan High Court] Before Muhammad Kamran Khan Mulakhail and Nazeer Ahmed Langove, JJ ABDUL GHANI Versus HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE through Registrar High Court Service Appeal No.02

Abdul Ghafoor Kakar V. Honorable Balochistan High Court, through Registrar and others,

PLC (C.S) 2024 1362 · Balochistan High Court · 2024

2024 P L C (C.S.) 1362 [Balochistan High Court] Before Muhammad Kamran Khan Mulakhail and Nazeer Ahmed Langove, JJ ABDUL GHAFOOR KAKAR Versus Honorable BALOCHISTAN HIGH COURT, through Registrar and others Ser

Before Muhammad Kamran Khan Mulakhail, Chairman and Gul Hassan Tareen, Member Nazir Ahmed V. Chief Justice High Court of Balochistan through Registrar and another,

PLC (C.S) 2024 1254 · Balochistan High Court · 2024

2024 P L C (C.S.) 1254 [Appellate Tribunal Balochistan High Court Quetta] Before Muhammad Kamran Khan Mulakhail, Chairman and Gul Hassan Tareen, Member NAZIR AHMED Versus CHIEF JUSTICE HIGH COURT OF BALOCHISTAN

Dr. Sara Jaffer V. Zarak Khan and another,

CLC 2023 77 · Balochistan High Court · 2023

2023 C L C 77 [Balochistan] Before Gul Hassan Tareen, J Dr. SARA JAFFER---- Petitioner Versus ZARAK KHAN and another ----Respondents Civil Revision No.105 of 2022, decided on 10th August, 2022. (a) Balochis

Bibi Khadija V. Pir Muhammad and 3 others,

PLJ 2025 Quetta 144 · Balochistan High Court · 2025

PLJ 2025 Quetta 144 Present: S ARDAR AHMAD HALEEMI , J. BIBI KHADIJA --Petitioner versus PIR MUHAMMAD and 3 others --Respondents C.R. No. 28 of 2023, decided on 8.5.2024. Succession Act, 1925 (XXXIX of 1925) --

Rab Nawaz and others V. Govt. of Balochistan through Chief Secretary and 3 others,

YLR 2017 1779 · Balochistan High Court · 2017

PLJ 2017 Quetta 87 (DB) Present : MUHAMMAD NOOR MESKANZAI , C.J. AND ABDULLAH BALOCH , J. RAB NAWAZ and others --Petitioners versus GOVT. OF BALOCHISTAN through Chief Secretary and 3 others --Respondents C.P. N

Said Akbar  V.  Gateron (Industries) Limited,

PLC 2011 159 · Balochistan High Court · 2011

2011 P L C 159 [Labour Appellate Tribunal Quetta] Before Abdul Qadir Mengal, Member SAID AKBAR Versus Messrs GATERON (INDUSTRIES) LIMITED Labour Appeal No.40 of 2009, decided on 2 9th Novemb

Balochistan Engineering Works Limited V. Jalal Khan,

PLC 2012 161 · Balochistan High Court · 2012

2012 P L C 161 [Balochistan Labour Tribunal] Before Abdul Qadir Mengal, Member BALOCHISTAN ENGINEERING WORKS LIMITED through Deputy Manager and others Versus JALAL KHAN and others Labour Ap

Muhammad Rafique and others V. Bibi Asifa and others,

CLC 2013 1446 · Balochistan High Court · 2013

2013 C L C 1446 [Balochistan] Before Mrs. Syeda Tahira Safdar, J MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE and others ----Petitioners Versus BIBI ASIFA and others ----Respondents Civil Revisions Nos.333 of 2002 and

Jamaluddin v. Chief Justice Balochistan High Court,

PLC (C.S) 2012 1311 · Balochistan High Court · 2012

2012 P L C (C.S.) 1311 [Balochistan High Court] Before Mrs. Syeda Tah ira Safdar and Jamal Khan Mandokhail, JJ JAMAL -UD-DIN Versus CHIEF JUSTICE, BALOCHISTAN HIGH COURT through Registrar Ser

Haji Muhammad Hassan Sherani V. Sardar Babar Khan and 13 others,

CLC 2019 670 · Balochistan High Court · 2019

2019 C L C 670 [Election Tribunal Balochistan] Before Justice Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar, Member Haji MUHAMMAD HASSAN SHERANI ----Petitioner Versus Sardar BABAR KHAN and 13 others ----Respondents Election Peti

Mrs. Tahira Parveen Baloch V. Chief Justice, High Court of Balochistan, Quetta through Registrar,

KLR 2018 Criminal Cases 74 · Balochistan High Court · 2018

2018 P L C (C.S.) 15 [Balochistan High Court] Before Mrs. Syeda Tahira Safdar and Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar, JJ Mrs. TAHIRA PARVEEN BALOCH Versus CHIEF JUSTICE, HIGH COURT OF BALOCHISTAN, QUETTA through Registr

Tahir Humayun and others V. High Court of Balochistan through Registrar and others,

YLR 2015 2349 · Balochistan High Court · 2015

P L D 2016 Balochistan 56 Before Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar and Naeem Akhtar Afghan, JJ TAHIR HUMAYUN and others ---Appellants Versus HIGH COURT OF BALOCHISTAN through Registrar and others ---Respondent

Mst. Razya Ghulam and another V. The General Public,

YLR 2015 2106 · Balochistan High Court · 2015

P L D 2015 Balochistan 127 Before Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar, J Mst. RAZYA GHULAM and another ---Petitioners versus The GENERAL PUBLIC ---Respondent Civil Revision No.75 of 2015, decided on 16th A

Shazia Azeem V. Government of Balochistan through Secretary Education Department, Quetta and 2 others,

PLC (C.S) 2011 1378 · Balochistan High Court · 2011

2012 P L C (C.S.) 648 [Balochistan Service Tribunal] Before Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar, Chairman, Muhammad Naeem Khan Ghalzai and Muhammad Anwar Khan, Members SHAZIA AZEEM Versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOC

Hatim Ameer Baloch V. Shahbana Khuda Bakhsh and another,

PLC (C.S) 2022 535 · Balochistan High Court · 2022

2022 P L C (C.S.) 535 [Balochistan High Court] Before Rozi Khan Barrech, J HATIM AMEER BALOCH Versus SHAHBANA KHUDA BAKHSH and another Succession Appeal No.04 of 2020, decided on 13th August, 2020. Balochis

Const. P. 3785/2026 (D.B.) Nazeer Masih V/S Province of Sindh & Another

2026 SHC KHI 1406 · Sindh High Court · 2026

Accordingly, these petitions are disposed of with direction to the respondents, particularly KMC and the concerned authorities, to ensure release of the outstanding pensionary benefits of the petitioners in accordance wi

Const. P. 3784/2026 (D.B.) Suraiya Pervez V/S Province of Sindh & Another

2026 SHC KHI 1405 · Sindh High Court · 2026

Accordingly, these petitions are disposed of with direction to the respondents, particularly KMC and the concerned authorities, to ensure release of the outstanding pensionary benefits of the petitioners in accordance wi

Const. P. 3783/2026 (D.B.) Jourge Masih V/S Province of Sindh & Ors

2026 SHC KHI 1404 · Sindh High Court · 2026

Accordingly, these petitions are disposed of with direction to the respondents, particularly KMC and the concerned authorities, to ensure release of the outstanding pensionary benefits of the petitioners in accordance wi

Const. P. 635/2025 (D.B.) Kashif Hussain & others V/S PO Sindh & others

2026 SHC LAR 1377 · Sindh High Court · 2026

Petition against recruitment policy dismissed.

Const. P. 199/2025 (D.B.) Shahmir sirohi & another V/S P.O Sindh & Others

Sindh High Court

Disposed of. Pensionary benefits.

Const. P. 2037/2025 (D.B.) Mst. Benazir & Another V/S P.O Sindh & Others

Sindh High Court

Disposed of. Pensionary benefits.

Const. P. 871/2025 (D.B.) Abdul Waheed V/S P.O Sindh & Others

Sindh High Court

Disposed of. Recruitment of Police Constable. Petitioner was declared Hepatitis C reactive

903/2007 Suit Allah Dino Khaskheli (Plaintiff) V/S HBL (Defendant)

Sindh High Court · 2016

Damages employement HBL

447/2008 Const. P. Ali Asghar Siddiqui (Petitioner) V/S M/s. Tyms Education Limited & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2012

447/2008 Const. P. Ali Asghar Siddiqui (Petitioner) V/S M/s. Tyms Education Limited & Ors (Respondent)

416/2011 Suit GHULAM NABI SHAH (Plaintiff) V/S PIAC & ORS (Defendant)

Sindh High Court · 2012

416/2011 Suit GHULAM NABI SHAH (Plaintiff) V/S PIAC & ORS (Defendant)

277/2014 Const. P. Pharmatee Pakistan PVT LTD (Petitioner) V/S Bakht Rehman and ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2019

277/2014 Const. P. Pharmatee Pakistan PVT LTD (Petitioner) V/S Bakht Rehman and ors (Respondent)

159/2022 Const. P. Sadam Hussain and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2022

whether the private respondents have the requisite length of service to claim promotion to the post of Executive Engineer (BS-18) in the PHED; and, whether the DPC considered the case of the petitioners along with privat

1497/2020 Const. P. Nasir Kamal (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

PNSC is hereby directed to pay all the post-retirement benefits to the petitioner strictly in accordance with law without fail within fifteen (15) days and to submit compliance report to this Court through MIT-II within

6241/2016 Const. P. Anjum Badar (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

petitioners have prayed that their temporary contractual appointments / services be regularized in BPS-17 under Section 3 of The Sindh (Regularization of Adhoc and Contract Employees) Act, 2013---Whether temporary employ

3100/2016 Const. P. Ms. Surriya Kanwal (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

whether the resignation once tendered by the civil servant voluntarily and accepted by the competent authority and communicated to him/her could be considered to be final and cannot be revoked afterwards?

7678/2015 Const. P. HBL (Petitioner) V/S Full Bench NIRC and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

HBL--back benefits--Through this petition, the petitioner-Habib Bank Limited (HBL) is praying for setting aside the order dated 28.10.2015 passed by the Full Bench of National Industrial Relations Commission Islamabad (N

1015/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Saleem Jehangir (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

It is also important to note that neither seniority nor promotion is the vested right of a civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion could be claimed or granted without the actual length of servic

185/2021 Const. P. Syeda Asia Rizvi (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2023

Whether a divorced daughter of a civil servant can claim pensionary benefitsd

6344/2019 Const. P. Dr. Jagdesh & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

Group insurance to employees of Government of Sindh, the Sindh Civil Servants Welfare Fund Ordinance 1979 and Sindh Civil Servants Welfare Fund Rules, 1980, Boards for administration of the Funds, State life insurance co

4965/2023 Const. P. Saleem Khan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

It is well-settled that while considering the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has to consider the merit of all the eligible candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion

2308/2020 Const. P. Zubair Javed (Petitioner) V/S Speaker Sindh Assembly & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2022

A person may be in the service of the Federation/province but for that reason, he cannot be classed as a 'Civil Servant' as defined in the Civil Servants Act 1973, except the employees whose terms and conditions of servi

457/2021 Const. P. M/S Rafique Ahmed & Co (Petitioner) V/S The Registrar of Trade Union Govt Sindh & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

Sind Industrial Relations Act, 2013. Maintainability of petition by Employer against order of Registrar Trade Union passed under section 9(10). Held Yes.

89/2022 Const. P. Sikandar Ali & Others (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2022

Service matters. No vested right concept in promotion policy. Government can amend the same, if deemed appropriate.

6261/2020 Const. P. SSGC Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Registrar of Trade Union NIRC and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

M/s. Sui Southern Gas Company Limited ("SSGC"), has sought enforcement of the guidelines provided by the Honourable Supreme Court of Pakistan in its order dated 11.03.2020 passed in Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.

4048/2012 Const. P. M/s. Dalda Foods(Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

We find that the private respondents were deprived of their due process rights. They were not confronted with the material based on which their services were verbally terminated. Even otherwise, the process followed by t

6222/2023 Const. P. Dr. Abdul Shakoor Abro (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2024

firstly section 10 of the Civil Servant Act 1973 provides that every civil servant shall be liable to serve within and outside Pakistan under the Federal Government or any Provincial Government, whereas Rule 20-A of the

646/2014 Const. P. Engro Foods Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Registrar of Trade Union and another (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2022

"Industrial Relations. Challenge to registration of trade union re trans-provincial establishment".

3502/2021 Const. P. Syed Babar Hashmi (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

We do not agree with the statement of the learned counsel for the Petitioner on the aforesaid assertions for the simple reason that compulsory retirement from service is a major penalty under service jurisprudence and fa

1299/2022 Const. P. Mujahid Ali Lund (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2024

Perusal of the substituted Rule 10-A reflects that with widening its scope, certain conditions were also imposed. Earlier the benefit of such rule was provided only to the children of the deceased civil servant who died

-1049/2024 Suit Muhammad Nasser Janjua & others (Plaintiff) V/S Federation of Pakistan & another (Defendant)

Sindh High Court · 2024

Civil Courts, including a Judge (in Chambers) of High Court of Sindh, exercising jurisdiction on the original side as a civil court under C.P.C. cannot entertain a civil suit of a civil servant relating to the terms and

3764/2022 Const. P. Dr. Muhammad Tariq Khan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2024

Applicability of Section 10 of Civil Servant Act, 1973, appointment of a junior officer when no suitable person is available for promotion; held No; appointment set-aside

1357/2022 Const. P. Altaf Hussain Khuhro & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2022

Petition of a civil servant in respect of his posting; not maintainable, whereas, pursuant to Section 10 of the Civil Servant Act, 1973, a Civil Servant cannot claim any specific posting or assignment while discharging h

649/2013 Const. P. Mst. Sahib Khatoon (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2019

Petitioner being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the non -action by the alleged Contemnors, filed an Application (CMA 14152/2015)under Article 204 of the Constitution, praying therein to initiate the Contempt Proceedi

6025/2024 Const. P. Dr. Pritam Das (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

So far as the stance of the respondents that pensionary benefits could be withheld on account of the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section 20 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals wit

1215/2020 Const. P. Bansi Lal Malhi & Another (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

the common grievance of the Petitioners is against the issuance of notifications dated 09.12.2019 and 26.2.2021 by the respondent-Establishment Division, whereby the direction was given to the Police Service of Pakistan

150/2025 Const. P. Dr.Tariq Hasan Memon (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

WAPDA Employees: Exclusive Jurisdiction of Federal Service Tribunal under Article 212 of the Constitution

339/2025 Const. P. Munawar Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

It is well settled that disciplinary proceedings fall within the ambit of expression terms and conditions of service of a civil servant, therefore, the jurisdiction of all other courts is barred by the provision of Sindh