👋 Welcome, visitor from Columbus, US!

Sindh High Court

19,805 judgments — showing 19201-19300

📝 Case Highlights from this court

Statement of Minor matters in Custody Cases at timesArticle 140- Cross Examination of a WitnessNo case if EOI is not submitted on timeSee all Case Highlights →

559/2008 Const. P. Fakir Kamal Khan@Kamaluddin Chandio (Applicant) V/S S.H.O P.S Karan, Shikarpur and others (Respondent)

2008

559/2008 Const. P. Fakir Kamal Khan@Kamaluddin Chandio (Applicant) V/S S.H.O P.S Karan, Shikarpur and others (Respondent)

460/2008 Const. P. Muhammad Raza Bhatti and others (Applicant) V/S Presiding Officer/Judge Banking Court Larkana &Ors (Respondent)

2008

460/2008 Const. P. Muhammad Raza Bhatti and others (Applicant) V/S Presiding Officer/Judge Banking Court Larkana &Ors (Respondent)

1095/2012 Cr.Bail Rafi-ur-rehman (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

2012

1095/2012 Cr.Bail Rafi-ur-rehman (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

71/2025 Cr.J.A Gulshan @ Guloo (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)

2026

71/2025 Cr.J.A Gulshan @ Guloo (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)

354/2011 Cr.Appeal Muhammad Nadeem (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)

2012

354/2011 Cr.Appeal Muhammad Nadeem (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)

481/2008 Cr.Bail Muhammad Azeem Kori (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

2008

481/2008 Cr.Bail Muhammad Azeem Kori (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

281/2022 Criminal Appeal MUNSIF KHAN S/O IKRAMULLAH KHAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)

2026

281/2022 Criminal Appeal MUNSIF KHAN S/O IKRAMULLAH KHAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)

472/2026 Cr.Bail AKHTAR S/O GHULAM FAREED (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)

2026

472/2026 Cr.Bail AKHTAR S/O GHULAM FAREED (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)

560/2007 Cr.Bail Satish Kumar and another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

2008

560/2007 Cr.Bail Satish Kumar and another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

1748/2006 Const. P. Saifullah Khamisani (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan &Ors. (Respondent)

2009

1748/2006 Const. P. Saifullah Khamisani (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan &Ors. (Respondent)

1881/2025 Const. P. Mst. Jawairia Juman (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)

2026

In view of the above discussion, these petitions are disposed of with directions to respondent Nos. 1 to 5 to finalize and release all admitted retirement benefits of the petitioner within a period of thirty (30) days fr

6131/2022 Const. P. Roohi Rasheed & Another (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

2026

Consequently, these petitions are disposed of with direction to the Cantonment Board Clifton that they shall, in compliance with its earlier undertaking before this Court, ensure the provision of a regular and equitable

1382/2026 Const. P. William (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

2026

1382/2026 Const. P. William (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

1959/2025 Const. P. Abid Abdullah (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)

2026

In view of the foregoing discussion, these petitions are disposed of with the following consolidated directions: 1. Joint demarcation of ROW vis-??-vis private lands in dispute shall be conducted within 60 days, as discu

2172/2024 Const. P. Pakistan Legal United Society (DEPD) GOS (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

2026

In such circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to complete the requisite exercise of the appointment of the petitioners within two month, to ensur

351/2025 Const. P. Qazi Tariq Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

2026

The reliance on Articles 4, 9, and 25 of the Constitution is also misplaced. No arbitrariness or mala fide has been shown in the decision-making process. The record reflects that the matter was duly placed before the com

514/2012 Cr.Bail Muhammad Asif & 02 Others (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

2012

514/2012 Cr.Bail Muhammad Asif & 02 Others (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

206/2006 H.C.A Syed Tariq Pervez (Appellant) V/S Trading Corporation of Pakistan Private Limited (Respondent)

2008

206/2006 H.C.A Syed Tariq Pervez (Appellant) V/S Trading Corporation of Pakistan Private Limited (Respondent)

404/2024 II.A. Karachi Metropolitan Corporation and others (Appellant) V/S Khalid Mehmood Siddiqui and another (Respondent)

2026

404/2024 II.A. Karachi Metropolitan Corporation and others (Appellant) V/S Khalid Mehmood Siddiqui and another (Respondent)

194/2014 Cr.Bail allah jurio (Applicant) V/S the state (Respondent)

2014

194/2014 Cr.Bail allah jurio (Applicant) V/S the state (Respondent)

349/2004 Cr.Appeal Haroon & 5 Ors (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)

2007

349/2004 Cr.Appeal Haroon & 5 Ors (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)

2194/2023 Const. P. Mst. Samina Naz (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

2026

Today, the officers present in Court have undertaken that the petitioner???s pensionary benefits shall be processed and credited into her account within a period of two weeks. It has further been assured that all formali

710/2023 Const. P. Azeemabad Coop Housing Society (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

2026

710/2023 Const. P. Azeemabad Coop Housing Society (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

1920/2026 Const. P. Said Alam (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

2026

In view of the statement made by the representative of KMC regarding finalization and readiness to release the admitted amount of pensionary benefits, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the petition furthe

667/2008 Const. P. Noor Muhammad Patoojo (Applicant) V/S SHO P.S Behram and others (Respondent)

2008

667/2008 Const. P. Noor Muhammad Patoojo (Applicant) V/S SHO P.S Behram and others (Respondent)

594/2008 Const. P. Shafqat Ali Sargani and others (Applicant) V/S D.P.O Larkana and others (Respondent)

2008

594/2008 Const. P. Shafqat Ali Sargani and others (Applicant) V/S D.P.O Larkana and others (Respondent)

1372/2026 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD UMAR S/O BANARAS KHAN (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

2026

1372/2026 Cr.Bail MUHAMMAD UMAR S/O BANARAS KHAN (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

205/2001 H.C.A National Investment Trust (Appellant) V/S Textile Managment PVT., (Respondent)

2026

Murabaha transaction.

325/2002 H.C.A M/S. Commercial Textile Printers (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Yasin (Respondent)

2008

325/2002 H.C.A M/S. Commercial Textile Printers (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Yasin (Respondent)

215/2016 Criminal Appeal SHAN ZAIB SHANGRI S/O ALAM ZAIB (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)

2016

215/2016 Criminal Appeal SHAN ZAIB SHANGRI S/O ALAM ZAIB (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)

872/2025 Criminal Appeal ASAD ALI SHAH S/O ANWER SHAH (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)

2026

872/2025 Criminal Appeal ASAD ALI SHAH S/O ANWER SHAH (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)

2504/2017 Const. P. Lal Muhammad Samoo (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)

2026

2504/2017 Const. P. Lal Muhammad Samoo (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)

1256/2026 Const. P. Amjad Khan (Petitioner) V/S Federal Government of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)

2026

1256/2026 Const. P. Amjad Khan (Petitioner) V/S Federal Government of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)

2188/2026 Const. P. Mst. Zulekha (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NADRA & others (Respondent)

2026

Accordingly, the respondents are directed to re-examine the petitioner???s claim along with all relevant records, particularly family-based identity documents, and determine the matter through a reasoned and speaking ord

1857/2025 Const. P. Sheeraz Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

2026

In such circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to complete the requisite exercise of the appointment of the petitioners within two month, to ensur

648/2008 Const. P. Manzoor Ali Siyal (Applicant) V/S Secretary Educ. & Literacy Dept. and others (Respondent)

2008

648/2008 Const. P. Manzoor Ali Siyal (Applicant) V/S Secretary Educ. & Literacy Dept. and others (Respondent)

3612/2025 Cr.Bail ALIM ALI S/O ABDUL HAKEEM (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)

2026

3612/2025 Cr.Bail ALIM ALI S/O ABDUL HAKEEM (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)

1031/2025 Criminal Miscelleneous MUHAMMAD SHEHZAD S/O ABDUL RASHEED (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ORS (Respondent)

2026

1031/2025 Criminal Miscelleneous MUHAMMAD SHEHZAD S/O ABDUL RASHEED (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ORS (Respondent)

11/2009 Cr.J.A Shahid Hussain (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

2009

11/2009 Cr.J.A Shahid Hussain (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

268/2008 Cr.Bail Arz Muhammad Junejo (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

2008

268/2008 Cr.Bail Arz Muhammad Junejo (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

204/2008 Cr.Bail Ghulam Sarwar alias Bado and others (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

2008

204/2008 Cr.Bail Ghulam Sarwar alias Bado and others (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

702/2010 Cr.Bail Zahoor Ahmed @ Abdul Karim & another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

2010

702/2010 Cr.Bail Zahoor Ahmed @ Abdul Karim & another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

17/2026 Const. P. M/s. KDA Officer CHS Limited (Petitioner) V/S Abdul Rauf Tabani & others (Respondent)

2026

In these circumstances, and particularly in view of the consensus between the learned counsel for the parties, this Court finds a fresh adjudication/decision by the learned trial Court is needed, based on the existing ev

2227/2026 Const. P. Noman Raisi (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)

2026

This Court is mindful that constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution is discretionary and equitable in nature and cannot ordinarily be invoked to interfere in matters involving immigration control

5786/2025 Const. P. Muhammad Nadeem Khan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

2026

For the foregoing reasons, these petitions are disposed of with directions to Respondents No.2 to 5 to ensure payment of the outstanding retirement and pensionary benefits of the petitioners strictly in accordance with t

6275/2025 Const. P. Muhammad Younus & another (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

2026

Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, b

6276/2025 Const. P. Faiyaz Ahmed & another (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

2026

Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, b

176/2008 Cr.Misc. Sanaullah Abro (Applicant) V/S ASI Muhammad Uris PS Ratodero and others (Respondent)

2008

176/2008 Cr.Misc. Sanaullah Abro (Applicant) V/S ASI Muhammad Uris PS Ratodero and others (Respondent)

465/2006 Suit Mrs. ALBA D?SA and others (Plaintiff) V/S Ms. Naheed Pabani and Ali Allarakia (Defendants 1 and 2) (Defendant)

2008

465/2006 Suit Mrs. ALBA D?SA and others (Plaintiff) V/S Ms. Naheed Pabani and Ali Allarakia (Defendants 1 and 2) (Defendant)

135/2025 Const. P. Mst. Farzana Anwar K.K (Petitioner) V/S The Chairman Union Committee No: 3, Mpk City & oth (Respondent)

2026

??? The words ???not being an interim order??? used in section 21 SRPO confirm that the legislature did not intend to make an interim order as challengeable. ??? A writ petition under Article 199, against an interim orde

74/2014 Cr.Rev burhan (Applicant) V/S the state (Respondent)

2014

74/2014 Cr.Rev burhan (Applicant) V/S the state (Respondent)

368/2008 Cr.Bail Allawaluddin (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

2008

368/2008 Cr.Bail Allawaluddin (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

858/2013 Cr.Bail Liaquat Mirza S/o Sohrab Mirza (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)

2013

858/2013 Cr.Bail Liaquat Mirza S/o Sohrab Mirza (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)

1059/2024 Const. P. Tahir Muhammad S/o Dost Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Faiza and others (Respondent)

2026

1059/2024 Const. P. Tahir Muhammad S/o Dost Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Faiza and others (Respondent)

2352/2025 Const. P. Aslam Faqira (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

2026

2352/2025 Const. P. Aslam Faqira (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

5684/2023 Const. P. Mrs. Raana Hyder Zaiid (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

2026

Consequently, these petitions are disposed of with direction to the Cantonment Board Clifton that they shall, in compliance with its earlier undertaking before this Court, ensure the provision of a regular and equitable

6271/2025 Const. P. Nasim Cooperative Housing Society Limited (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

2026

Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, b

5169/2023 Const. P. Mumtaz Majeed (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

2026

In view of the foregoing discussion, these petitions are disposed of with the following consolidated directions: 1. Joint demarcation of ROW vis-??-vis private lands in dispute shall be conducted within 60 days, as discu

5783/2023 Const. P. Aslam Shakoor (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

2026

Nevertheless, by way of last indulgence, the respondents are granted a further period of two (02) months to ensure release and payment of all outstanding pensionary and post-retirement benefits of the petitioners strictl

27/2026 Const. P. M/s. SSS Corporation (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

2026

Nevertheless, it is equally well-settled that public procurement and management of public assets must strictly conform to the principles of transparency, fairness, equality of opportunity, and compliance with Articles 4,

158/2014 Cr.Bail Muhammad Adnan alias Abu Hamza (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

2014

158/2014 Cr.Bail Muhammad Adnan alias Abu Hamza (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

238/2008 H.C.A Federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Saad & Ors (Respondent)

2008

238/2008 H.C.A Federation of Pakistan & Ors. (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Saad & Ors (Respondent)

1146/2025 Cr.Bail Muhammad Faizan (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

2026

1146/2025 Cr.Bail Muhammad Faizan (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

1290/2014 Const. P. aaa (Petitioner) V/S dzfbvdfb (Respondent)

2014

1290/2014 Const. P. aaa (Petitioner) V/S dzfbvdfb (Respondent)

3052/2025 Cr.Bail GHULAM QADIR LASHARI S/O MUHAMMAD SALEH LASHARI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)

2026

3052/2025 Cr.Bail GHULAM QADIR LASHARI S/O MUHAMMAD SALEH LASHARI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)

966/2025 Const. P. Kamran (Petitioner) V/S Rafiuddin Paracha & Others (Respondent)

2026

966/2025 Const. P. Kamran (Petitioner) V/S Rafiuddin Paracha & Others (Respondent)

1127/2024 Const. P. Noor Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

2026

Subsequently, a progress report was submitted following a joint site visit. It stated that mining operations had already been stopped, no Ratti Bajri was found at the site, and the permits were limited to limestone and m

4547/2025 Const. P. Muhram Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

2026

Accordingly, these petitions along with pending application(s) are disposed of with directions to the Inspector General of Police, Sindh, to reconsider the petitioner???s candidature for the subject post. However their c

5774/2025 Const. P. Aftab Jhangir (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)

2026

5774/2025 Const. P. Aftab Jhangir (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)

487/2026 Const. P. Muhammad Yousuf Iqbal & others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

2026

In such circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to complete the requisite exercise of the appointment of the petitioners within two month, to ensur

65/2008 Const. P. Mst: Umrah Kalhoro (Applicant) V/S P.O Sindh & ors (Respondent)

2008

65/2008 Const. P. Mst: Umrah Kalhoro (Applicant) V/S P.O Sindh & ors (Respondent)

27/2026 Cr.Bail Weeram Khan Mahar & Another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

2026

Bail order.

120/2008 Cr.Misc. Muhammad Khan (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

2008

120/2008 Cr.Misc. Muhammad Khan (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

90/2008 Cr.Misc. Qurban Ali Totani (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

2008

90/2008 Cr.Misc. Qurban Ali Totani (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

955/2026 Const. P. Muhammad Saleem (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)

2026

955/2026 Const. P. Muhammad Saleem (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)

2438/2026 Const. P. Muhammad Akram Bhutto (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)

2026

Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the controversy, the matter is remitted to the competent authority to reconsider and decide the case of the Petitioner afresh, strictly in accordance with law

4100/2025 Const. P. Abbas Ali (Petitioner) V/S The Registrar Federal Urdu University (Respondent)

2026

In the totality of circumstances, this Court is of the considered view that the impugned order dated 04.03.2025 suffers from procedural impropriety, non-application of mind, and failure to observe the constitutional and

940/2023 Const. P. Sallah Uddin (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

2026

In such circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to complete the requisite exercise of the appointment of the petitioners within two month, to ensur

257/2008 Const. P. Mst.Farzana and others (Applicant) V/S Ghulam Sarwar Leghari and others (Respondent)

2008

257/2008 Const. P. Mst.Farzana and others (Applicant) V/S Ghulam Sarwar Leghari and others (Respondent)

923/2013 Cr.Bail SHAFAKAT ALI S/O LIAQAT (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

2013

923/2013 Cr.Bail SHAFAKAT ALI S/O LIAQAT (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

277/2009 Const. P. Mst.Naseem Ghri (Petitioner) V/S Mohammad Arif Abbasi and an other (Respondent)

2009

277/2009 Const. P. Mst.Naseem Ghri (Petitioner) V/S Mohammad Arif Abbasi and an other (Respondent)

6/2008 Spl.Cr.Bail Muhammad Haroon Gaba (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

2008

6/2008 Spl.Cr.Bail Muhammad Haroon Gaba (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

367/1995 Suit Faruqi House Building Corporation, a private companyRegistered under the Companies Ordinance 1984,Having its registered office at 28, Machi Miani MarketKharadar, Karachi (Plaintiff) V/S All residents of 1-A-8-4, (Defendant)

2007

367/1995 Suit Faruqi House Building Corporation, a private companyRegistered under the Companies Ordinance 1984,Having its registered office at 28, Machi Miani MarketKharadar, Karachi (Plaintiff) V/S All residents of 1-A

73/2026 Cr.Bail Shahnawaz (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

2026

73/2026 Cr.Bail Shahnawaz (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

314/2025 Const. P. Muhammad Tahir Khan (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Zobia (Respondent)

2026

314/2025 Const. P. Muhammad Tahir Khan (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Zobia (Respondent)

2316/2018 Const. P. Mohammad Aslam (Petitioner) V/S IIIrd ADJ Karachi Central & Others (Respondent)

2026

2316/2018 Const. P. Mohammad Aslam (Petitioner) V/S IIIrd ADJ Karachi Central & Others (Respondent)

1890/2008 Const. P. Jay Ram, Ji (Petitioner) V/S Naresh Kumar Makwana & Ors (Respondent)

2008

1890/2008 Const. P. Jay Ram, Ji (Petitioner) V/S Naresh Kumar Makwana & Ors (Respondent)

356/2007 Suit Mr. Talat Hussain (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Rado Builders & Developers & Anothers (Defendant)

2008

356/2007 Suit Mr. Talat Hussain (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Rado Builders & Developers & Anothers (Defendant)

4655/2024 Const. P. Muhammad Amir Hameed (Petitioner) V/S Rollins Industries Pvt Ltd & Others (Respondent)

2026

Accordingly, in view of the settled law laid down by the Supreme Court of Pakistan, the impugned judgment of the Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal to the extent of denial of full back benefits suffers from legal infirmity

5285/2025 Const. P. Mujeeb ur Rehman (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)

2026

5285/2025 Const. P. Mujeeb ur Rehman (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)

6504/2018 Const. P. Hikmat Shah & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

2026

Learned counsel for the petitioner agreed to the proposal and seeks disposal of the petition in that term. However states that time frame be given to the commissioner for wages to take decision. 5. Accordingly, without t

6277/2025 Const. P. Abid Hussain Marvi & another (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

2026

Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, b

948/2015 Const. P. Bina Qasim (Petitioner) V/S Government of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

2016

948/2015 Const. P. Bina Qasim (Petitioner) V/S Government of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

27/2019 M.A. Bin Safeer Supermarket (Appellant) V/S Aurangzeb and Others (Respondent)

2026

27/2019 M.A. Bin Safeer Supermarket (Appellant) V/S Aurangzeb and Others (Respondent)

191/2003 Suit Sunble Zareen Rashid (Plaintiff) V/S Muhammad Hanif Khan and Qamarun Nisa Begum (Defendant)

2006

191/2003 Suit Sunble Zareen Rashid (Plaintiff) V/S Muhammad Hanif Khan and Qamarun Nisa Begum (Defendant)

336/2026 Const. P. Mst. Seema & another (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

2026

336/2026 Const. P. Mst. Seema & another (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

5983/2025 Const. P. Safoorah Begum (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)

2026

5983/2025 Const. P. Safoorah Begum (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)

273/2008 Cr.Bail Anwar Ali Chandio (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

2008

273/2008 Cr.Bail Anwar Ali Chandio (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

143/2008 Cr.Misc. Qabool @ Muneer Chandio (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

2008

143/2008 Cr.Misc. Qabool @ Muneer Chandio (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

562/2005 Suit BASHOO MAL (Appellant) V/S V/S NASEER AHMED (Respondent)

2008

562/2005 Suit BASHOO MAL (Appellant) V/S V/S NASEER AHMED (Respondent)