👋 Welcome, visitor from Columbus, US!

135/2025 Const. P. Mst. Farzana Anwar K.K (Petitioner) V/S The Chairman Union Committee No: 3, Mpk City & oth (Respondent)

Sindh High CourtConstitutional Law2026

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author)

Share on WhatsApp

135/2025 Const. P. Mst. Farzana Anwar K.K (Petitioner) V/S The Chairman Union Committee No: 3, Mpk City & oth (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Hasan (Akber)(Author) Order Date: 11-FEB-26

??? The words ???not being an interim order??? used in section 21 SRPO confirm that the legislature did not intend to make an interim order as challengeable. ??? A writ petition under Article 199, against an interim order under SRPO, would not be maintainable per se, except where basic jurisdiction under the Ordinance and landlord-tenant relationship is challenged, with arguable justification.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

No case if EOI is not submitted on time

PLJ 2108 SC 208 · Sindh High Court · 2019

Commercial and Service Activities of Civil Aviation Authority

PLJ 2017 SC 558 · Sindh High Court · 2017

Responsibility of NHA in road Accidents

PLJ 2016 · Sindh High Court · 2016

Legal Status of Sale Deed could not be resolved in Rent Proceedings

Sindh High Court · 2015

Decree of Khula on unregistered Nikahnama

PLJ 2014 · Sindh High Court · 2014