Constitutional Law

993 judgments — showing 501-600

42/2017 Const. P. Mohsin Jameel (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

This Court emphasizes the Competent Authority's established legal right to formulate rules for efficient service and resolve inconsistencies within the Service Rules. Setting promotion eligibility criteria is the respons

354/2024 Const. P. Mumtaz Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2024

There is no cavil to the proposition that this court has no jurisdiction to take suo moto action under Article 199 of the Constitution. However, the Supreme Court of Pakistan held in the case of Divisional Superintendent

255/2025 Const. P. Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan (Petitioner) V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

The law enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair to the offender and the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberratio

4165/2015 Const. P. Ghulam Ali Bhatia And ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. Of Pakistan and ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2020

WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 199 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN, 1973. A Divisional Bench of this Court comprising of Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Mr. Justice Mahmood A. Khan, has pronounced

1015/2014 Const. P. LT CDR (R) Dr. Muhammad Nawaz (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

The primary submissions of the petitioner is that the staff plot is a contractual entitlement. However, this raises the question of whether a Constitutional Petition is the appropriate legal avenue for an employee of a s

1935/2019 Const. P. Shahid Rasool Memon & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

It may be noted that although the Colleges in question are permanent and are required to have permanent status, the staff working therein is required to have permanent status. However, the respondents have created the re

4002/2011 Const. P. Ibrahim Noor (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan International Airlines Corporation & Ors. (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically lead to exoneration from departmental charges based on the same factual grounds. Wh

1982/2025 Const. P. Syed Aslam Shah (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

This petition is not covered by the respondents' policy, and therefore, the petitioner's request for selection grade in BS-16 cannot be entertained at this stage, as "much water has already flown under the bridge." Conse

825/2024 Const. P. Shamim Rabani (Petitioner) V/S Umair Ali (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2024

On the issue of concurrent findings of the two Courts below and jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution, it needs to be reiterated that this Court, normally, does not operate as a Court of appeal

2837/2017 Const. P. Afzal Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

For the reasons set out hereinabove, it is held that the Board of Revenue, Sindh, was vested with lawful and statutory jurisdiction under Section 8 of the Sindh Board of Revenue Act, 1957, to entertain and adjudicate upo

1001/2024 Const. P. Iftikhar Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2024

Learned Assistant A.G Sindh has resisted these petitions on the premise that there are disputed questions of facts involved in the matters, as such these petitions cannot be entertained. At this stage, we confronted him

6789/2018 Const. P. Shaukat Ali & Ors (Petitioner) V/S S.B.P & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In view of the foregoing discussion, it becomes obvious that the petitioners are, in substance, seeking extension of a benefit which was neither available nor legally recognized at the time of their retirement. Such a cl

4810/2020 Const. P. Tanveer Ahmed Siddiqui (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

It is well settled that contractual appointments ended with contract expiration/termination, and a temporary/contract employee cannot claim permanent status as a matter of right, nor can he /she be reinstated merely for

4242/2017 Const. P. Niaz Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

Given the AAG's statement regarding the petitioners' current pay scales (BPS-17 for #1-6, BPS-16 upgraded to BPS-17 for #7-13 & #15-18, and BPS-11 upgraded to BPS-17 for #14) and the cancellation of prior upgrade orders

5893/2016 Const. P. Syed Salman Hasan and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

Learned AAG submitted that the petitioners' appointments are illegal, contravening KoFHA's 1988 Regulations and 1982 Ordinance. The AAG refuted allegations against the former Secretary, noting his retirement on March 25,

824/2024 Const. P. Arif Ali (Petitioner) V/S Umair Ali (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2024

On the issue of concurrent findings of the two Courts below and jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution, it needs to be reiterated that this Court, normally, does not operate as a Court of appeal

2259/2023 Const. P. Muhammad Wajid (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

Adverting to the assertion of the petitioner that he was not subject to the PAA, the same is misconceived on the premise that every officer/member of the force is subject to the PAA, as discussed supra, thus findings can

1175/2023 Const. P. Abdul Karim S/o Ali Khan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

A habeas corpus under Article 199(1)(b) of the 1973 Constitution cannot last forever. After 25 years, the corpus was exhumed twice, and DNA tests carried out twice, as well. The court must balance efficiency with the adm

2202/2022 Const. P. Gulzar Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S The CEO Pakistan Steel & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

According to information received, Pakistan Steel Mills (PSM) has experienced a significant financial loss of over Rs. 100 billion, with total liabilities exceeding Rs. 110 billion. Given this financial crisis, it is not

145/2025 Const. P. Aqsa (Petitioner) V/S Irfan & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

???CHILD RIGHTS. EFFECT OF PARENTAL DISPUTES ON CHILDREN. CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN. UN CONVENTION ON RIGHTS OF CHILD. EU???s PRINCIPLES OF PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITES. GUARDIAN & WARDS ACT. ??? Comprehensive Interim Meeting

5649/2020 Const. P. Asif Ali and Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

The Supreme Court also emphasizes that regularization is a policy decision within the executive???s purview and generally beyond judicial interference. Courts can review policies only if they violate constitutional right

8209/2018 Const. P. Syed Wahid Ali & Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

The Supreme Court also emphasizes that regularization is a policy decision within the executive???s purview and generally beyond judicial interference. Courts can review policies only if they violate constitutional right

1/2026 Const. P. Azhar uddin Noonari (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Primarily, this Court cannot intervene in routine administrative or membership disputes of a private council unless there is clear evidence of fundamental rights violations, which facts are missing in the present case. I

3388/2019 Const. P. Ashfaq Ahmed and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

This petition is not covered by the respondents' policy, and therefore, the petitioner's request for selection grade in BS-16 cannot be entertained at this stage, as "much water has already flown under the bridge." Conse

228/2022 Const. P. Alauddin (Petitioner) V/S The President NBP and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

The petitioner's acceptance of the reinstatement and the signing of the joining report, which designated his time away as "extraordinary leave without pay," prevents him from now claiming back benefits for that period. H

2576/2025 Const. P. Dr. Saiyid Khusro Iqbal through attorney (Petitioner) V/S Government of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Prima facie, thus, there is no vacancy for the petitioner to claim, and no ground to question Respondent No.4???s legal authority to hold office. Therefore, the writ of quo warranto, which is remedial in nature and requi

245/2025 Const. P. Qurban Ali S/o Qasim (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

The law enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair to the offender and the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberratio

792/2026 Const. P. Justice (R) Aftab Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Government of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

It is well settled that judicial review does not extend to re-evaluating executive policy decisions unless such decisions are arbitrary, without lawful authority, or offend fundamental rights. Accordingly, in the absence

9012/2018 Const. P. Syed Anis Uddin & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

The Supreme Court also emphasizes that regularization is a policy decision within the executive???s purview and generally beyond judicial interference. Courts can review policies only if they violate constitutional right

5003/2023 Const. P. Khawaja Maqbool Mustafa (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Another (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

We, for the aforesaid reasons, allow this constitutional petition and direct the competent authority/respondents to allow the petitioners proforma promotion by way of circulation. As the petitioner has already retired, t

1915/2019 Const. P. Dr. Asha Bai (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

The petitioner's regularization case, ongoing since 2015 (CP 2187/2015), was sent for reconsideration in 2018, but a committee found her unsuitable based on subjective criteria. While challenging this as arbitrary, this

55/2023 Const. P. Ali Muhammad alias Babu Bhai Thr. Iftikharuddin (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Farzana Ghulam Nabi and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

It is settled law that constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 cannot be invoked as a substitute for appeal. Accordingly, Petitions are dismissed along with listed applications if any.

306/2026 Const. P. Siddiq Ullah (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

??? Constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 in Habeaus Corpus matters, especially in family disputes, is supervisory in nature. ??? It intervenes only where there is a jurisdictional error, a violation of fundament

78/2026 Const. P. Hascol Petroleum (Petitioner) V/S Shahzaib Rind & Another (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

It is well settled that Constitutional jurisdiction cannot be invoked to short-circuit the statutory process merely on the basis of an arbitration clause which, in the facts of the case, does not govern the dispute in qu

4715/2023 Const. P. Syed Ana Kazmi (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

In view of the above discussion, the petition is not maintainable either on facts or on the law. However, before parting with this case, it may be observed that every person has a right to approach a Court of law for red

5857/2021 Const. P. Nafees Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In view of the above statutory framework, settled principles of law, and factual matrix, it is evident that the impugned order dated 17.09.2020 does not suffer from any jurisdictional defect or illegality warranting inte

960/2024 Const. P. Patras Masih (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

Petitioner has not been dealt with in accordance with law by the respondents. Denial of pensionary rights to the petitioner was tantamount to impinging fundamental rights of the petitioner, which could not be given a cle

5859/2022 Const. P. Liaqat Ali (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

The jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution is limited to the extent of ensuring that state functionaries do what they are required by law to do and refrain from doing what they are prohibited by

637/2022 Const. P. Mehmood Khan Thr. LR Naseem Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) V/S IIIrd ADJ, Karachi East and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

Petitioner worker/workmen may not side-step the provisions of the Sindh Payment of Wages Act, 2015, for recovery of unpaid wages. Writ Petition dismissed.

3240/2014 Const. P. Muhammad Yousuf Jamal (Petitioner) V/S Govt Of Sindh and ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

The objection regarding maintainability has already been overruled by this Court, as it is well-settled in Ardeshir Cowasjee v. Karachi Building Control Authority (1999 SCMR 2883) that any resident of Karachi can maintai

414/2015 Const. P. Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Administration Municipal Committee T.Adam & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

This Court is saddled with a responsibility to safeguard the fundamental rights of the citizens granted to them under the Constitution. The powers conferred to this Court under its writ jurisdiction in ordinary cases are

1356/2025 Const. P. Gul Zada (Petitioner) V/S NIRC and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In view of the foregoing reasons, it is noticed that both impugned orders suffer from procedural impropriety, violation of natural justice, and failure to exercise jurisdiction in accordance with law. Consequently, the c

274/2025 Const. P. Mst. Shakeela Anjuman (Petitioner) V/S Raja Rashid Asghar (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

CHILD RIGHTS. EFFECT OF PARENTAL DISPUTES ON CHILDREN. CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN. UN CONVENTION ON RIGHTS OF CHILD. EU???s PRINCIPLES OF PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITES. GUARDIAN & WARDS ACT. ??? Comprehensive Interim Meeting Sc

1890/2026 Const. P. M/s. International Building Industries (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Since the matter is already pending before the competent forum, this Court is not inclined to delve into the factual controversies in exercise of constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution, particu

4588/2022 Const. P. Aslam Pervaiz Durrani and Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

This court will not interfere with the Sindh government's policy decision under Article 199 of the Constitution, as no mala fide has been attributed in such a policy decision. However, if the respondent department intend

4060/2023 Const. P. Rizwan Aziz Siddiqui (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Another (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

Under Article 199 of the Constitution, the High Court has a discretionary power to act in support of the law and protect constitutional rights. This power is reserved for extraordinary situations to ensure justice is ser

8534/2017 Const. P. Yasir Khursheed and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Sindh and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

The Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh, is directed to convene a high-level meeting within two weeks of all relevant stakeholders, including but not limited to SSWMB, KMC, Cantonment Boards, DMCs, SEPA, Irrigation Depa

5335/2025 Const. P. Muhammad Anwar (Petitioner) V/S Government of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In light of the foregoing discussion, we hold that the Respondent, i.e., the Karachi Water & Sewerage Board, is under a legal as well as constitutional obligation to ensure the regular supply of potable water to the affe

5366/2022 Const. P. Hamza Faheem (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

The Constitution petition is not maintainable against the service matters of Pakistan's Armed Forces due to the constitutional bar in Article 199(3) of the Constitution of Pakistan, which prevents High Courts from issuin

6285/2022 Const. P. Irfan Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

In the light of the above discussion, the instant constitutional petitions, along with pending application(s) are dismissed on the ground that the petitioner's requested relief is no longer available. The petitioner firs

3460/2025 Const. P. Mansoor Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) V/S President, NBP & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

For the foregoing reasons, this Court finds no illegality, irregularity, or jurisdictional defect in the impugned judgment dated 01.07.2025 passed by the learned Full Bench, NIRC, warranting interference under Article 19

4983/2025 Const. P. M/s Sarim Burney Welfare Trust (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan & another (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In view of the above, both petitions are allowed and Respondent No.1 NADRA, in coordination with the concerned Union Councils and the Social Welfare Department, is directed to devise and implement a uniform and child-sen

4792/2020 Const. P. Rizwan Ashraf and Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

Primarily, this court's role is not to rewrite policy or interfere with the executive's financial decisions unless a clear violation of law or fundamental rights is proven which is not the case at hand. The government

2082/2024 Const. P. M. Tariq Mansoor Advocate (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In view of the above, the appointment of a Deputy Prime Minister under Notification No. 2-4/2012-Min. I dated 28th April 2024, and the subsequent SRO 2062(I)/2024 dated 18th December 2024, prima facie, seems to be a poli

7230/2022 Const. P. Muhammad Sajid Farooqui & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

The result of the above discussion is that the captioned constitutional petition is allowed in the terms of the ratio of the order dated 20.04.2017, as well as a judgment passed by the Hon???ble Supreme Court of Pakistan

3553/2019 Const. P. Fida Muhammad and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

The Supreme Court also emphasizes that regularization is a policy decision within the executive???s purview and generally beyond judicial interference. Courts can review policies only if they violate constitutional right

5281/2023 Const. P. Dr. Dilshad Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Another (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

On the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified by the decisions of the Supreme Court rendered in the cases of Dr. Syed Sabir Ali v. Government of Punjab through Secretary Health Punjab and others, 2008 SCMR 1535, Federat

5819/2016 Const. P. Abdul Kareem (Petitioner) V/S M/s Trading Co. and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

The present petition essentially seeks re-examination of factual controversies already adjudicated upon by multiple forums, which is impermissible in constitutional jurisdiction. The scope of interference under Article 1

6020/2025 Const. P. Ibrahim (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

The petitioner filed this constitutional petition without impleading all affected members. The Registrar Cooperative Societies, Sindh, on 16-12-2025, noted the lack of transparency in the election process and ordered fre

1484/2025 Const. P. Fatima (Petitioner) V/S Abdul Qadir & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

For the foregoing reasons, I am of the considered view that this case does not warrant interference in the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution. However, the issue of possession

4217/2023 Const. P. Muhammad Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

We, for the aforesaid reasons, allow this constitutional petition along with pending application(s) and direct the competent authority/respondents to consider the case of the petitioner along with all eligible candidates

442/2021 Const. P. Mst. Nimra and Another (Petitioner) V/S IXth ADJ, Karachi East and Another (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

No jurisdictional error, illegality, perversity or misapplication of law has been pointed out in the impugned judgment which may justify interference in exercise of constitutional jurisdiction. The findings recorded by t

3898/2013 Const. P. M/s Karimjee Ibrahimjee and Sons (Petitioner) V/S C.D.G.k and Os (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

The findings recorded by the learned trial Court as well as the learned appellate Court are based upon proper appraisal of the pleadings and evidence available on record and do not suffer from any jurisdictional defect,

1522/2026 Const. P. Rameez Ali (Petitioner) V/S Secretary Health & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Even otherwise, the material placed on record does not demonstrate any procedural illegality in the acceptance of resignation. The plea of coercion remains unsubstantiated and uncorroborated by contemporaneous evidence.

5049/2024 Const. P. Sharifullah Khan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In similar circumstances, this Court and other benches have held that petitions challenging the election or internal governance of associations registered under the Societies Registration Act are devoid of maintainabilit

5648/2022 Const. P. Azmat Khan (Petitioner) V/S Appellate Board of Bahria University & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

The appellate order shows that the petitioner's employment was governed by a specific contract, not by general government rules, regardless of whether the organization is government-controlled. When a special contract o

1266/2020 Const. P. Usman Ghani (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Per FCC's scope of Article 199

2563/2022 Const. P. Munir Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

Prima facie, there are conflicting positions among the parties. The KMC's counsel states that the property remains officially classified as commercial, and the NOCs were issued in accordance with the rules. This is suppo

922/2025 Const. P. M/s. Al-Hashmi Brothers Thr Attorny Muhammad Hanif (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

Prima facie, this is beyond the scope of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution. However, this Court can only say that the petitioner shall not be harassed by the police officials or by the officials of the SIT

4991/2023 Const. P. Muhammad Khan Magsi (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

We for the aforesaid reasons dispose of this constitutional petition and direct the competent authority/respondents to reconsider the case of the petitioner for proforma promotion in BS-20 in terms of the Supreme Court d

2555/2024 Const. P. Taimoor & Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In view of the above, this Court is of the considered opinion that the petitioners have failed to establish any legal right presently infringed, nor any corresponding legal duty breached by the respondents. Consequently,

1663/2026 Const. P. TRG Pakistan Limited (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Consequently, by the consent of the parties and without touching upon the merits of the case, this Constitutional Petition, along with all pending applications, is disposed of with the direction that the competent author

1305/2025 Const. P. Abdul Majid Sahito & another (Petitioner) V/S Irum Bukhari & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In view of the foregoing, this Court is of the view that the Petitioners have failed to establish any legal infirmity, jurisdictional defect, or violation of fundamental rights in respect of the impugned promotions. The

129/2026 Const. P. Kashif (Petitioner) V/S Faryal Waseem & Another (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Applying these principles, in the present case, constitutional jurisdiction cannot be invoked to reopen or revise interlocutory orders or proceedings where an adequate statutory remedy of appeal is available, and the pet

2169/2024 Const. P. Shahid Ali Zaidi (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Accordingly, the Accountant General???s Office is directed to convene a joint meeting of all concerned parties, including representatives of the Board of Secondary Education, Karachi, within three (03) weeks from the dat

4710/2025 Const. P. Muzaffar Rasool & others (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In such circumstances, the competing claims and the presence of disputed questions of fact regarding the lawfulness of disciplinary actions, suspension of licenses, and eviction notices, the Court finds that these issues

1494/2025 Const. P. Abubakar Hasan (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In these circumstances, the impugned action suffers from multiple legal infirmities: lack of statutory authority, absence of jurisdictional foundation under Section 18, violation of Article 10-A, and reliance on undisclo

1284/2026 Const. P. Ghulam Ali Wassan & others (Petitioner) V/S Government of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In view of the foregoing, and following the analogy adopted in Constitutional Petition No. D-321 of 2025, this petition is disposed of with directions to the competent authority of the respondents to consider the petitio

1558/2026 Const. P. Adnan Hadi (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

For the foregoing reasons, this Court is of the considered view that the decision of the Sindh Police Recruitment Board, whereby the candidature of the petitioner for appointment as Police Constable was rejected solely o

297/2026 Const. P. Faisal (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Accordingly, while reaffirming the earlier directions, this Court holds that if no adverse material exists against the petitioner, there remains no legal justification to curtail his fundamental rights. Therefore this pe

68/2025 Const. P. M/s Marvo Exports (Petitioner) V/S Farman Khan & Another (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In view of the above, the impugned judgment is not sustainable in law, as it is based on conjectures, improper presumptions, and misapplication of legal principles. The same has resulted in grave miscarriage of justice a

3670/2022 Const. P. Pakistan Services Ltd (Petitioner) V/S NIRC Full Bench & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In principle the remand is not to be ordered as a matter of course; rather, it is to be ordered only where the order is passed without jurisdiction, without hearing, or in violation of principles of natural justice. 11.

2723/2022 Const. P. Dr. Shehbaz Haider (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

We, for the aforesaid reasons, allow this constitutional petition and direct the competent authority/respondents to grant him proforma promotion along with his colleagues in BS-19/20, if they have been granted such rank,

4717/2024 Const. P. M/s Habib Sugar Mills Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Nadeem and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In these circumstances, discussed supra, no case for interference under Article 199 of the Constitution is made out, and the petition is liable to be dismissed. 20. For the foregoing reasons, we are of the considered vie

5071/2014 Const. P. Muhammad Farooq Kasmani and Ors (Petitioner) V/S KMC and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and by consent, the instant Constitutional Petition is disposed of in the terms that the impugned notice/challan issued by the Respondent shall be revis

6232/2025 Const. P. Syed M. Hamid Kazim Alvi (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

It is clarified that in case the petitioner remains aggrieved by the order so passed by the competent authority, he shall be at liberty to avail the remedy available to him under the law. 9. Without touching the merits o

57/2026 Const. P. Aijaz Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

While affirming that a substantial part of the cause of action arose in Hyderabad and thus rejecting the territorial objection, we nonetheless dismissed the petition for being non???maintainable. As the disputes relating

2088/2024 Const. P. Dehli Hakiman CHS Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

It is observed that while property rights are protected under Articles 23 and 24 of the Constitution, the present matter involves disputed questions of fact, including alleged cancellation of lease in 1994 and lack of pr

795/2026 Const. P. Mustafa Fuzail Merchant & another (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In these circumstances, while taking note of the statement made by the learned Assistant Attorney General that petitioner No.2 is not on any stop list and is free to travel abroad on valid documents, this petition is dis

2220/2026 Const. P. Muhammad Javaid & others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In the instant matter, the petitioners have specifically challenged the jurisdictional legality of the impugned order and the discriminatory denial of relief already granted by this Court to similarly placed employees. M

2194/2024 Const. P. Rollins Industries (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Learned SLAT and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Accordingly, in view of the settled law laid down by the Supreme Court of Pakistan, the impugned judgment of the Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal to the extent of denial of full back benefits suffers from legal infirmity

4355/2025 Const. P. Muhammad Zakria (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Prima facie, the petitioner???s citizenship has been consistently recognized as evidenced by his CNIC and Pakistani passports issued and renewed since 1989. Even when a doubt arose in 2009, it was duly verified through

786/2025 Const. P. M/s AA Joyland (Pvt)Ltd Thr Malik Amjad (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Constitutional petition dismissed, tenant barred from invoking Article 199 after failing to pursue statutory remedy, eviction upheld on concurrent findings of default.

2418/2017 Const. P. S.M. Kaleem Makki (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In view of the above legal position, we are of the considered opinion that the withdrawal of the Petitioner???s absorption in the PSS cadre was lawful and in compliance with the judgment of the Supreme Court. The promot

650/2021 Const. P. Sikandar Ali Sial and Others (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the Petitioners submitted that, pursuant to the Order of the Supreme Court of Pakistan dated 21.06.2012, passed in C.P. No. 2523 of 2011, the Petitioners were

989/2026 Const. P. Muhammad Abdullah (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan International Airlines & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Furthermore, no mala fide, favoritism, or abuse of authority has been specifically pleaded with supporting particulars, nor has any material been produced to demonstrate that the process was conducted in a manner contrar

1011/2023 Const. P. Ebrahim Abdul Ali Thr. Fatima Abbas (Petitioner) V/S Xth ADJ, Karachi South and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Lastly, the findings recorded by the learned Appellate Court are findings of fact arrived at after remand, examination of the postman, and scrutiny of documentary evidence based on the cross-examination of the witness. I

4653/2024 Const. P. Saqib (Petitioner) V/S Rollins Industries Pvt Ltd & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Accordingly, in view of the settled law laid down by the Supreme Court of Pakistan, the impugned judgment of the Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal to the extent of denial of full back benefits suffers from legal infirmity

5500/2025 Const. P. Legal Aid Society (Petitioner) V/S NADRA & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In view of the above, both petitions are allowed and Respondent No.1 NADRA, in coordination with the concerned Union Councils and the Social Welfare Department, is directed to devise and implement a uniform and child-sen

868/2026 Const. P. Maula Bux Sahito & others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

So far as the issue of seniority is concerned, it is well settled that disputes relating to seniority, promotion, or other service matters of civil servants are to be agitated before the competent Service Tribunal consti