Vice-Chancellor, University of Balochistan v. Chancellor,

MLD 2012 1597Balochistan High CourtConstitutional Law2012

Bench: Jamal Khan Mandokhail

Share on WhatsApp
2012 M L D 1597 [Balochistan] Before Jamal Khan Mandokhail and Naeem Akhtar Afghan, JJ VICE -CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF BALOCHISTAN, QUETTA --Petitioner Versus CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF BALOCHISTAN, QUETTA and another Respondent Constitutional Petition No. 356 of 2012, decided on 21st June, 2012. (a) University of Balochistan Act (III of 1996) --- ----S. 12(1) ---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199 ---Constitutional petition ---Educational Institution ---Tenure of office of Vice -Chancellor ---Petitioner was appointed Vice -Chancellor, for a period of two years ---Petitioner had agreed to the terms and conditions of the appointment ---Contention of the peti tioner was that under S. 12(1) of the University of Balochistan Act, 1996; tenure of the office of Vice -Chancellor was prescribed as four years, therefore, the period of two years mentioned in the notification of his appointment was illegal and void ---Validity---Petitioner, in the present case, had agreed to do the job only for a period of two years and did not challenge the notification during his tenure and acted as an Acting Vice -Chancellor after his tenure ---Petitioner had , on completion of his two yea rs tenure, voluntarily relinquished the charge as permanent Vice -Chancellor, and the notification of his appointment and the terms and conditions therein, ceased to exist, which amounted to waiver on the petitioner's part ---"Waiver" meant that when a perso n, by a conduct, had the intention to waive a right, or when a person had a choice between relinquishment and enforcement of a right, and did not claim it, and opted for lapsing of a right, expressly by declaration or by a conduct, the same amounted to a " waiver" ---To establish waiver by conduct, it must be shown that a person entitled to a right had the knowledge of breach thereof and that he had acquiesced or failed to act accordingly ---Petitioner had waived his alleged right by his conduct ---Constitution al petition was also hit by laches as the terms and conditions of his appointment had been questioned after a lapse of two years ---Constitutional petition was dismissed. (b) Waiver --- ----Concept and connotation ---"Waiver" meant that when a person, by conduct, had the intention to waive a right, or when a person had a choice between relinquishment and enforcement of a right, and did not claim it, and opted for lapsing of a right, expressly by declaration or by a conduct, the same amounted to a waiver. Black Law Dictionary and Principle of Justice of Law of Evidence rel and quoted. Gohar Yaqoob Yousafzai for Petitioner. Amanullah Kanrani for Respondents. Date of hearing: 7th June, 2012. JUDGMENT JAMAL KHAN MANDOKHAIL, J. ---Facts in brief are that the petitioner was appointed as Vice -Chancellor on 7th May, 2010, through a Notification No.SGB/1 -2/2010/1115 -22, subject to agreed terms and conditions, pursuant to which the tenure of the office was fixed for two years with effect from 7th May, 2010 . On completion of two years prescribed tenure, a Search Committee was constituted, which invited application through the publication in different newspapers from the qualified persons for the appointment as Vice -Chancellor, University of Balochistan. The petitioner feeling aggrieved, preferred the instant petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the petitioner was appointed by the Chancellor by exercising power under section 12(1) of the University of Balochistan Act 1996, which presc ribes the tenure of the Vice -Chancellor as four years, therefore, the period of two years mentioned in the notification, issued on May, 2010 is void and illegal. He further stated that the tenure is fixed by the Act, therefore, with consent of the parties, it cannot be curtailed, hence, the petitioner is entitled to continue the office for the remaining, two years. 3. On the other hand, the learned Advocate General opposed the contention and stated that the petitioner is estopped under the law to challeng e the notification, as he by his conduct accepted the terms and conditions including the tenure of the office, therefore, under the law, he is not entitled to file the petition. The learned A.G. further stated that the post of the Vice - Chancellor has been re-advertised and the petitioner is also one of the candidate, therefore by his conduct as well, he is not entitled to file the instant petition. 4. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have perused the record. It is to be noted that pur suant to the referred notification, the Chancellor approved the terms and conditions of the post of Vice -Chancellor, for a period of two years from the date of appointment i.e. May, 7, 2010. The petitioner accepted the terms and conditions and started functioning as Vice -Chancellor, without any objection. He continued to hold his office for about two years, however, before the completion of his two years tenure he addressed a letter to the Chancellor which is as follow: -- "I wish to inform you that the co ntract period of the undersigned as Vice -Chancellor, University of Balochistan and Dr. Mehrab Baloch, Pro -Vice Chancellor, University of Balochistan is going to be expired on 7th May, 2012. A necessary action in this regard is requested. Prof Dr. Abdul N abi, Vice Chancellor" In response to the above letter, the Chancellor UoB issued a notification, which is as follows: -- "Dated Quetta the 7th May, 2012. Notification: No.SGB/1 -2/2012/575 -83, in exercise of powers conferred under section 12(2) of Uo B Act 1996, the Hon'able Governor/Chancellor, University of Balochistan is pleased to direct Dr. Abdul Nabi, to continue to look after day to day affairs of the University as Acting Vice - Chancellor, University of Balochistan in stop gap arrangement, till t he appointment of a regular Vice -Chancellor on the recommendation of the Search Committee (under process). By the Order of the Hon' able Governor/Chancellor UoB." 5. In view of the fact that the tenure of the petitioner had expired, the Chan cellor constituted a Search Committee for the recommendation of three suitable candidates for the appointment of the Vice -Chancellor, Pro -Vice Chancellor, University of Balochistan, which invited the applications and the petitioner also applied afresh. No doubt as per section 12(1) of the University of Balochistan Act 1996, the Vice -Chancellor shall be appointed for a period of four years or more, but in the present case the petitioner himself agreed to do the job only for a period of two years and did not challenge the notification during his tenure. His tenure was to expire on 6th of May, 2012, therefore, at his request, the Chancellor asked the petitioner to act as an Acting Vice -Chancellor to look after the day to day affairs, which assignment he accepte d. It is proved that on completion of his two years period, he voluntarily relinquished the charge as permanent Vice -Chancellor, consequently, the earlier notification dated 7th May, 2010 and its terms and conditions ceased to exist, which amounts to waive r on his part. The word waiver has been defined in the Black Law Dictionary as under: -- "The voluntary relinquishment or abandonment ---express or implied ---of a legal right or advantage; FORFEITURE." Simil
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

PLJ 2017 Quetta 58 (DB)

Balochistan High Court · 2018

Authority of Selection Board cannot be Challenged

PLJ 2018 · Balochistan High Court · 2018

Locus Poenitentiae--In appointment of Person

PLJ 2018 · Balochistan High Court · 2018

Iftikhar Chodhary's decision in a Guardian Case

PLJ 2014 SC 157 · Balochistan High Court · 2014

Leave to Appeal in a Guardian Case

PLJ 2014 SC 157 · Balochistan High Court · 2014