Banking & Corporate

406 judgments — showing 1-100

What are the requirements of company secretary?

Islamabad High Court · 2014

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN Directors and Secretaries Guide NIC Building, Jinnah Avenue, Islamabad, Pakistan. Ph. No.: 051-9207091-4, Fax: 051-9204915 Website: www.secp.gov.pk E-mail: enquiries@secp.go

Insurance Ordinance, 2000

Not specified · 2014

[AMENDED UPTO NOVEMBER 2011] TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title, extent and commencement 2. Definitions 3. Division of insurance business into life and non-life 4. Classes of life and non-life business P

The Insurance Rules 2002

Islamabad High Court · 2014

EXTRAORDINARY PU BUSHED BY AUTHORITY ISLAMABAD, THURSDAY, AUGUST 8, 2002 PART II Statutory Notifications (S.R.O.) GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN MINISTRY OF COMMERCE NOTIFICATION Islamabad, the 7th August, 2002 S.R.O.498 (1)/200

Admission must be clear, specific and unambiguous

PLJ 2014 · Sindh High Court · 2014

PLJ 2014 Karachi 102 Present: Muhammad Ali Mazhar , J MEDIA MAX (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI through Chief Executive --Plaintiff versus ARY COMMUNICATION (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI through Chief Executive and another --Defendants Suit

ENFORCEMENT OF SHARI’AH ACT. 1991

Not specified · 2013

ACT X OF 1991 An Act for the enforcement of Shari’ah [Gazette of Pakistan, Extraordinary, Part 1, 18th June, 1991] The following Act of Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament) received the assent of the President on the 5th June, 1

Bank can not claim mark-up in decree

Not specified · 2012

Citation Name : 2010 CLD 1792 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Side Appellant : BANK OF KHYBER Side Opponent : NAZAMUDDIN Ss. 3, 9 & 10—Suit for recovery of loan– court by consent of the parties appointed a Chartered Accountant

Bank has entitlement to costs in a suit for recovery of money

Not specified · 2012

Citation Name : 2009 CLD 312 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Side Appellant : HABIB BANK LIMITED Side Opponent : TAUQEER AHMED SIDDIQUI Ss.3, 9 & 17—Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Ss.151, 152 & 153—Decree for recovery of l

Contract of Guarantee is Enforceable under the law

Not specified · 2012

Citation Name : 2006 CLD 178 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Side Appellant : AMIR JAVED Side Opponent : AL-BARAKA ISLAMIC INVESTMENT BANK —Ss.7, 17 & 3—Contract Act (IX of 1872), Ss.132 & 135—Suit for recovery of loan—Contrac

Zarai tariqiati bank limited went into appeal

Not specified · 2012

Citation Name : 2009 CLD 36 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Side Appellant : ZARAI TARIQIATI BANK LIMITED through Branch Manager Side Opponent : HASSAN AFTAB FATIANA Ss. 3 & 27, proviso—Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S.47– -

Article 63 of the Constitution dealing with disqualifications

Not specified · 2012

[ 63. Disqualifications for membership of Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament): (1) A person shall be disqualified from being elected or chosen as, and from being, a member of the Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament), if

Is it a war between PPP pawn and Sharif Courts

Supreme Court of Pakistan · 2012

How the conspiracies are hatched and how the pawn game is played with such astuteness; has plagued the fragile history of Pakistan since 2008, when PPP came into power. The only target was and is, the Supreme Court of

Declaratory suit cannot effect the case of bank below

Not specified · 2012

Citation Name  : 2005  CLD  1083     LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Side Appellant : Messrs MALIK ISRAR SALIM & BROTHERS through Proprietor Side Opponent : ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN LTD. ---Ss.9 & 10---Recovery of bank loan ---L

Kohinoor Mills Versus SECP

PLJ 2011 Lahore 697 · Lahore High Court · 2011

PLJ 2011 Lahore 697 Present: Ijaz-ul-Ahsan, J. KOHINOOR SPINNING MILLS LTD.--Petitioner versus SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN--Respondent C.O. 51 of 2010, decided on 16.5.2011. Companies Ordinance, 1984-- -

Competency of Appeal under Banking Companies Ordinance 1979

PLJ 1997 Peshawar 120 (DB) · Peshawar High Court · 1997

PLJ 1997 Peshawar 120 (DB) Present: MIAN SHAKIRULLAH JAN AND KHALIDA RACHID, JJ. MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD.-Appellant versus M/s ADAMJEE PAPER & BOARD MILLS LTD. and two others-Respondents F.A.O. No. 11 of 1995 announce

3976/2021 Const. P. Faisal Masroor Siddiqi (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

3976/2021 Const. P. Faisal Masroor Siddiqi (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and Others (Respondent)

6306/2021 Const. P. Iqbal Hussain Channa (Petitioner) V/S NAB and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

Issuance of notice to the Special Prosecutor NAB, by learned Administrative Judge, in such a way and fixing the hearing of the pre-arrest bail on 26.10.2021, without passing interim orders, ex facie amounts to dis

73/2015 Const. P. Rafiq Haji Usmani (Petitioner) V/S The Chairman NAB and ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2015

73/2015 Const. P. Rafiq Haji Usmani (Petitioner) V/S The Chairman NAB and ors (Respondent)

69/2019 Cr.Acctt.A Mehboob Ali Zardari (Appellant) V/S NAB (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2020

69/2019 Cr.Acctt.A Mehboob Ali Zardari (Appellant) V/S NAB (Respondent)

508/2025 Const. P. Muhammad Siddiq Majid and Others (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and Another (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

Constitutional vs. Regular bench; distribution of jurisdiction.

5009/2019 Const. P. Sheikh Muhammad Ashgar (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2020

5009/2019 Const. P. Sheikh Muhammad Ashgar (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB & Ors (Respondent)

3998/2021 Const. P. Lal Muhammad Jokhio (Petitioner) V/S NAB and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

In the view of above legal position, it is observed that superior Court can entertain application for pre-arrest bail and grant relief to the accused in appropriate cases where accused could inter alia establish that he

30/2018 Cr.Acctt.A HAROON PUNJWANI S/O SULEMAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE THROUGH CHAIRMAN NAB (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2020

30/2018 Cr.Acctt.A HAROON PUNJWANI S/O SULEMAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE THROUGH CHAIRMAN NAB (Respondent)

2/2022 M.A. Mckinsey & Company Pakistan (Private) Limited (Appellant) V/S Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2023

It is nobody's case that holding company has discharged such obligations, if at all it is under such duty. It is not stated that the holding company has disclosed such data in the consolidated financial statements of the

3026/2016 Const. P. Abdul Hameed (Petitioner) V/S The Chairman NAB and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2018

3026/2016 Const. P. Abdul Hameed (Petitioner) V/S The Chairman NAB and Ors (Respondent)

5458/2020 Const. P. Haji Adam Jokhio (Petitioner) V/S NAB and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

In the view of above legal position, it is observed that superior Court can entertain application for pre-arrest bail and grant relief to the accused in appropriate cases where accused could inter alia establish that he

4849/2016 Const. P. Rafique Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) V/S The NAB (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2017

4849/2016 Const. P. Rafique Ahmed Memon (Petitioner) V/S The NAB (Respondent)

319/2023 Suit MAXCO (PVT.) LIMITED (Plaintiff) V/S SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN (Defendant)

Sindh High Court · 2023

Justice demands that rights in the physical world and the digital/virtual world should be the same and at par with each other. Yet currently, SECP appears to be maintaining two different sets of standards for qualificati

4/2021 Cr.Acctt.A SULTAN QAMAR SIDDIQUI S/O QAMAR UL HASSAN (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

NAB Matter - Appeal against conviction

1465/2024 Const. P. National Accountability Bureau (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2024

Request of the National Accountability Bureau for 25 % share amount of misappropriation recovered by NAB is denied.

45/2022 Suit.B THE BANK OF PUNJAB (Plaintiff) V/S M/S HASCOL PETROLEUM LIMITED (Defendant)

Sindh High Court · 2023

Condonation Application to allow Defendant Customer to file leave to defend application in Banking Suit allowed. Summons were defective, as Plaintiff Bank did not include the registered address of the Defendant Company i

2820/2014 Const. P. Syed Mansoor Ali (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2014

2820/2014 Const. P. Syed Mansoor Ali (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and Ors (Respondent)

427/2013 Const. P. Shahid Ansari & others (Petitioner) V/S The Chairman NAB & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2014

427/2013 Const. P. Shahid Ansari & others (Petitioner) V/S The Chairman NAB & others (Respondent)

1653/2019 Const. P. Irshad Ahmed Gopang (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2020

1653/2019 Const. P. Irshad Ahmed Gopang (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB & Others (Respondent)

3147/2025 Const. P. Sindh Public Service Commission & Another (Petitioner) V/S NAB & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

NAB, Inquiry Quashed Matter falling outside the ambit of NAO, 1999

1299/2022 Const. P. Muhammad Rafique Memon (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

With the above observations, the petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs with direction to the competent authority of respondents to reconsider the case of promotion of the petitioner in BPS-20, within thre

12/2020 Cr.Acctt.A ANWAR AI S/O RAJAB ALI (Appellant) V/S THE STATE THROUGH CHAIRMAIN NAB (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

NAB matter - Appeal against conviction

2135/2021 Const. P. Noman Ali Bhatti (Petitioner) V/S Govt. of Sindh and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

Sindh Education Foundation --we conclude that there is no illegality, infirmity, or material irregularity in the impugned letters dated 06.02.2020 & 30.11.2020 issued by the respondent-SEF. Besides, the issue of continue

23/2008 Execution Bankers Equity Limited & others (Decree Holder) V/S M/s Pangrio Sugar Mills Ltd. (Judgment Debtor)

Sindh High Court · 2017

The Banking Court while executing a decree passed under Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 is entitled to adopt any procedure deemed appropriate by it to effect sale of mortgaged properties in

10/2009 I. A Syed Itrat Hussain Rizvi (Appellant) V/S M/s. Tameer Micro Finance & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2017

The appellant through present first appeal has challenged the Judgment and decree passed by the learned District Judge, Karachi (Central), in a summary chapter suit filed by respondent No.1 for recovery its amount agains

3/2025 Cr.Acctt.A ZAKARIA MOTIWALA S/O MOOSA MOTIWALA (Appellant) V/S THE NAB THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN (Hq) Islamabad (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

3/2025 Cr.Acctt.A ZAKARIA MOTIWALA S/O MOOSA MOTIWALA (Appellant) V/S THE NAB THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN (Hq) Islamabad (Respondent)

4449/2021 Const. P. Pakistan Stock Brokers Association (Petitioner) V/S Pakistan Stock Exchange Ltd and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2024

When SECP introduced an amendment to the Futures Eligibility Criteria (FEC) of the PSX Regulations proposed by PSX, it could not have directed PSX to proceed straightaway to publish the amended Regulations in the Officia

4610/2018 Const. P. Inamuddin Marwat (Petitioner) V/S NAB and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2018

4610/2018 Const. P. Inamuddin Marwat (Petitioner) V/S NAB and Others (Respondent)

6026/2018 Const. P. Shoukat Hussain Jokhio (Petitioner) V/S The Stae thr Chairman NAB & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2020

6026/2018 Const. P. Shoukat Hussain Jokhio (Petitioner) V/S The Stae thr Chairman NAB & Ors (Respondent)

7380/2018 Const. P. Karamuddin Panhyar (Petitioner) V/S The NAB (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2020

7380/2018 Const. P. Karamuddin Panhyar (Petitioner) V/S The NAB (Respondent)

2262/2016 Const. P. Syed Athar Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2018

2262/2016 Const. P. Syed Athar Hussain (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and Ors (Respondent)

692/2013 Const. P. M/s. Memon Motors (Petitioner) V/S NAB & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2014

692/2013 Const. P. M/s. Memon Motors (Petitioner) V/S NAB & Others (Respondent)

421/2016 Const. P. Amir Khursheed (Petitioner) V/S The Chairman NAB and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2018

421/2016 Const. P. Amir Khursheed (Petitioner) V/S The Chairman NAB and Ors (Respondent)

2136/2012 Const. P. Hassan Jameel Ansari (Petitioner) V/S NAB & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2012

2136/2012 Const. P. Hassan Jameel Ansari (Petitioner) V/S NAB & Ors (Respondent)

8/2024 Judicial Companies Misc. EFG HERMES PAKISTAN LTD AND ANOTHER (Applicant) V/S Court Notice - PSX & SECP (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2024

Sanction of scheme of merger.

1298/2024 Const. P. Jan Muhamad (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2024

1298/2024 Const. P. Jan Muhamad (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and others (Respondent)

113/2011 I. A Al Baraka Bank Pvt Ltd (Appellant) V/S Raja Ashfaq Hussain (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2012

We may observe that the aforesaid provision of Section 9 of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance 2001 is not comprehensive and exhaustive in deriving conclusion regarding the jurisdiction of the Co

3984/2014 Const. P. Mr. Shumail Sikandar (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB And ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2015

3984/2014 Const. P. Mr. Shumail Sikandar (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB And ors (Respondent)

2186/2021 Const. P. Zabardast Khan Mehar (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

NAB Petition for Reduction of Surety Amount

3141/2015 Adm. Suit Sarfraz Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2015

3141/2015 Adm. Suit Sarfraz Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB (Respondent)

88/2016 I. A House Building Finance Company Ltd. (Appellant) V/S Major Muhammad Abdul Aziz & another (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2023

The learned Judge has correctly granted HBFC cost of funds from 2010 onwards in the Judgment, which, according to Respondent No.1-Customer???s admission, was the date of default, yet there is no explanation why the learn

3779/2012 Const. P. Irfan Iqbal Puri (Petitioner) V/S The Chairman, NAB and another (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2014

3779/2012 Const. P. Irfan Iqbal Puri (Petitioner) V/S The Chairman, NAB and another (Respondent)

318/2023 Suit MUHAMMAD AYUB TAREEN & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S JS BANK LIMITED & OTHERS (Defendant)

Sindh High Court · 2023

-A subsidiary as defined in Section 2(68) of the Companies Act, 2017, which can only exist in relation to a holding company in which the holding company either (i) controls the composition of the Board of the subsidiary

6/2012 Cr.Acctt.A Shaikh Shahid Umar (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2022

Whether Complaint of a single individual falls within the definition of Public at Large so as to attract the provisions of Section 9(a) (ix) & (x) of the NAB Ordinance; Held No.

767/2023 Suit HASCOL LUBRICANTS (PRIVATE) LIMITED (Plaintiff) V/S SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAK (SECP) & ORS (Defendant)

Sindh High Court · 2023

Once costs are paid to SECP for obtaining certified copies of statutory forms, SECP cannot deny such requests made by the company. Under Regulation 20 of the Companies (Registration Offices) Regulations, 2018, SECP may

811/2020 Const. P. Hanif Lalani (Petitioner) V/S The State Through DG NAB, Sindh (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2020

811/2020 Const. P. Hanif Lalani (Petitioner) V/S The State Through DG NAB, Sindh (Respondent)

3682/2011 Const. P. Syed Sohail Hassan (Petitioner) V/S The State - NAB (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2013

3682/2011 Const. P. Syed Sohail Hassan (Petitioner) V/S The State - NAB (Respondent)

133/2015 Const. P. Mrs. Seema Sheerazi (Petitioner) V/S NAB (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2015

133/2015 Const. P. Mrs. Seema Sheerazi (Petitioner) V/S NAB (Respondent)

3032/2013 Const. P. Ali Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S NAB & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2015

3032/2013 Const. P. Ali Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S NAB & Others (Respondent)

3807/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Imran (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

3807/2021 Const. P. Muhammad Imran (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and Others (Respondent)

5862/2015 Const. P. Fareed Ahmed Yousufani (Petitioner) V/S The State throug NAB (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2015

5862/2015 Const. P. Fareed Ahmed Yousufani (Petitioner) V/S The State throug NAB (Respondent)

2382/2016 Const. P. Syed Sohail Hasan (Petitioner) V/S D.G NAB and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2016

2382/2016 Const. P. Syed Sohail Hasan (Petitioner) V/S D.G NAB and Ors (Respondent)

36/2016 I. A M/s. House Building Finance Co. Ltd. (Appellant) V/S The Judge Banking Court No. IV Karachi & another (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2020

36/2016 I. A M/s. House Building Finance Co. Ltd. (Appellant) V/S The Judge Banking Court No. IV Karachi & another (Respondent)

2874/2014 Const. P. KHALID AFTAB KHAN (Petitioner) V/S THE DIRECTOR GENERAL NAB (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2014

2874/2014 Const. P. KHALID AFTAB KHAN (Petitioner) V/S THE DIRECTOR GENERAL NAB (Respondent)

76/2021 I. A Abdul Karim Momnani & Another (Appellant) V/S M/S. Habib Bank Limited (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2023

Appellant-Customer challenged the Banking Court judgment and decree not in appeal but by filing an Application under Section 12(2) CPC alleging that the branch manager had misappropriated funds from the Appellant-Custome

1370/2013 Const. P. Shaikh Muhammad Nadeem (Appellant) V/S National Accountability Bureau (NAB) (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2013

1370/2013 Const. P. Shaikh Muhammad Nadeem (Appellant) V/S National Accountability Bureau (NAB) (Respondent)

663/2024 Const. P. Syed Wajahat Hussain Zaidi (Petitioner) V/S Banking Court No. 5 Karachi and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2024

663/2024 Const. P. Syed Wajahat Hussain Zaidi (Petitioner) V/S Banking Court No. 5 Karachi and Others (Respondent)

877/2020 Const. P. Sarvech Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S NAB and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2020

Both these petitions are allowed, however, with no order as to costs. Resultantly, the impugned orders of removal of the petitioners from service are hereby set aside and their cases are remanded back to the competent a

1/2016 Cr.Acctt..Acq. A. THE STATE / NAB (Appellant) V/S MOHAMMAD SARDAR KHAN (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2020

1/2016 Cr.Acctt..Acq. A. THE STATE / NAB (Appellant) V/S MOHAMMAD SARDAR KHAN (Respondent)

664/2026 Const. P. Zia ul Hassan (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and another (Respondent)

Sindh High Court

OFFENCE FALLING OUTSIDE THE NAB JURISDICTION INVESTIGATION QUASHED

634/2013 Const. P. M. Iqbal (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2017

634/2013 Const. P. M. Iqbal (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and Ors (Respondent)

3133/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Yousuf (Petitioner) V/S NAB (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2020

3133/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Yousuf (Petitioner) V/S NAB (Respondent)

5/2018 Cr.Acctt.A ALTAF AHMED S/O GUL HASSAIN SHAIKH (Appellant) V/S NAB (THE STATE) (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2020

5/2018 Cr.Acctt.A ALTAF AHMED S/O GUL HASSAIN SHAIKH (Appellant) V/S NAB (THE STATE) (Respondent)

4570/2015 Const. P. Munir Ahmed (Applicant) V/S Federation of Pakistan and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2016

Mere fact that petitioner opted for plea bargain, which was not even recommended by the NAB Authorities, or duly approved by the Accountability Court, cannot operate as a bar for withholding the bail, if the accused othe

3758/2015 Const. P. Ghulam Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S NAB And ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2015

3758/2015 Const. P. Ghulam Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S NAB And ors (Respondent)

3/2018 Cr.Acctt.A SYED SALAHUDDIN S/O NIZAMUDDIN (Appellant) V/S THE NAB (THE STATE) (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2019

3/2018 Cr.Acctt.A SYED SALAHUDDIN S/O NIZAMUDDIN (Appellant) V/S THE NAB (THE STATE) (Respondent)

841/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Safdar (Petitioner) V/S NAB and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2018

841/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Safdar (Petitioner) V/S NAB and Ors (Respondent)

1684/2012 Const. P. Matloob Ahmed Khan and others (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2019

1684/2012 Const. P. Matloob Ahmed Khan and others (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and others (Respondent)

4056/2014 Const. P. Muhammad Afzal (Petitioner) V/S NAB and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2015

4056/2014 Const. P. Muhammad Afzal (Petitioner) V/S NAB and Ors (Respondent)

27/2018 I. A M/S Z.T.B.L and others (Appellant) V/S Yaseen Dahri (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

Law of limitation will also apply to Sale of property by a Financial Institution under Section 15 of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance 2001. If limitation to file a Suit for recovery under secti

214/2016 Const. P. Zuhair Siddiqui (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2016

214/2016 Const. P. Zuhair Siddiqui (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NAB and Ors (Respondent)

5391/2020 Const. P. Haji M. Ayaz Memon (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2020

In view of the statement of learned AAG, let notice be issued to the Chief Secretary, Sindh, to submit complete details of such cases of the Civil / Government Servants who are facing disciplinary proceedings or criminal

1/2024 I. A Ali Raza Mugheri (Appellant) V/S Ghulam Rasool Abro and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2024

Banking Court assessed whether the Customer had any cause of action based on facts alleged and documents filed by the Financial Institution with its application for leave to defend. The Banking Court did not decide the

8903/2018 Const. P. M/s Crescent Star Insurance (Petitioner) V/S SECP and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2024

8903/2018 Const. P. M/s Crescent Star Insurance (Petitioner) V/S SECP and Ors (Respondent)

2019/2014 Const. P. Ashkaran @ Aashankar (Petitioner) V/S The State (NAB) and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2019

2019/2014 Const. P. Ashkaran @ Aashankar (Petitioner) V/S The State (NAB) and others (Respondent)

3685/2017 Const. P. Shamsuddin Dal (Petitioner) V/S Director General NAB (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2018

3685/2017 Const. P. Shamsuddin Dal (Petitioner) V/S Director General NAB (Respondent)

5932/2015 Const. P. Talha Ali Mehboob (Petitioner) V/S The State throug NAB (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2015

5932/2015 Const. P. Talha Ali Mehboob (Petitioner) V/S The State throug NAB (Respondent)

1637/2020 Const. P. Mrs. Naheed Durrani (Petitioner) V/S NAB & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

Petitioners, accused in reference were extended a relief of pre and post arrest bail by this Court . NAB not satisfied with the order challenged the same before the Honorable Supreme Court and remanding the case back to

3821/2016 Const. P. KES Stockbrokers Association and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Chairman SECP and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2022

3821/2016 Const. P. KES Stockbrokers Association and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Chairman SECP and Ors (Respondent)

563/2007 Suit MCB Bank Limited (Plaintiff) V/S EMAD UL HASAN (Defendant)

Sindh High Court · 2024

Plaintiff-Bank elected to proceed against Customer for recovery of loan in the ordinary civil jurisdiction. The trial court never framed any issue of jurisdiction, and parties had concluded evidence. Appellate Court fra

3117/2011 Const. P. Syed Naseer Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S The State (NAB) (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2012

3117/2011 Const. P. Syed Naseer Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S The State (NAB) (Respondent)

63/2018 Cr.Acctt..Acq. A. THE STATE THROUGH CHAIRMAN NAB (Appellant) V/S MEHREEN ZAFAR WD/O MUHAMMAD ZAFAR SALEEM (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2025

63/2018 Cr.Acctt..Acq. A. THE STATE THROUGH CHAIRMAN NAB (Appellant) V/S MEHREEN ZAFAR WD/O MUHAMMAD ZAFAR SALEEM (Respondent)

48/2013 J.M M/s.Pearl Fabrics Corporation & others (Applicant) V/S M/s.KASB Bank Ltd., & another (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2014

(a) Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance (XLVI of 2001)--- ----S. 19(1), 19(2), 4 & 9---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 12(2) & O.XXIII, Order XXI---Interpretation of S. 19 of the Financial Instit

7991/2019 Const. P. Saeed Hassan (Petitioner) V/S NAB and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

Accountability Courts Sindh at Karachi ,rejecting the report recommending closure of investigation undertaken by National Accountability Bureau against petitioner on a complaint . The petitioner, a builder, statedly a pa

3998/2014 Const. P. Muhammad Sami (Petitioner) V/S NAB (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2014

3998/2014 Const. P. Muhammad Sami (Petitioner) V/S NAB (Respondent)

2356/2019 Const. P. Agha Siraj Khan Durrani (Petitioner) V/S The State (NAB) (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

Petitioners, accused in reference, were extended a relief of pre and post arrest bail by this Court. NAB not satisfied with the order challenged the same before the Honorable Supreme Court where remanding the case back t