Property & Rent

344 judgments — showing 1-100

Every co-sharer is owner in each and every inch of joint property until it is partitioned by metes and bounds

PLJ 2023 Lahore 528 · Lahore High Court (Rawalpindi Bench) · 2023

PLJ 2023 Lahore 528 [Rawalpindi Bench, Rawalpindi] Present : Mirza Viqas Rauf , J. FAZAL KARIM and 2 others--Petitioners versus MEHBOOB KHAN (deceased) through his legal heirs--Respondents C.R. No. 212-D of 2018, decided

Suit for Cancellation of Partition

PLJ 2023 Quetta 130 · Balochistan High Court · 2023

PLJ 2023 Quetta 130 Present : Rozi Khan Barrech , J. MUHAMAMD YAHYA KHAN--Petitioner versus AKRAM SHAH and others--Respondents C.R.P. Nos. 614 & 672 of 2021, decided on 14.6.2022. Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908)--

Non Production of Second Marginal Witness

PLJ 2020 Lahore 386 · Lahore High Court · 2020

PLJ 2020 Lahore 386 Present: Muhammad Ameer Bhatti , J. MUHAMMAD TUFAIL etc.--Appellants versus MUHAMMAD ASHIQ--Respondent R.S.A. No. 163 of 2011, heard on 20.11.2019. Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908)-- ----S. 100

PLJ 2018 SC 66

PLJ 2018 SC 66 · Islamabad High Court · 2018

PLJ 2018 SC 66 [Appellate Jurisdiction] Present : Mian Saqib Nisar, HCJ, Umar Ata Bandial & Faisal Arab, JJ. WAQAR ZAFAR BAKHTAWARI and 6 others--Appellants versus Haji MAZHAR HUSSAIN SHAH and 6 others--Respondents C.A.

PLJ 2018 SC 95

PLJ 2018 SC 95 · Lahore High Court · 2018

PLJ 2018 SC 95 [Appellate Jurisdiction] Present : Mian Saqib Nisar, HCJ, Umar Ata Bandial & Faisal Arab, JJ. CDA and another--Appellants versus HASHWANI HOTELS Ltd.--Respondent Civil Misc. Applications Nos. 2593 and 2812

Vendee has to prove Title, Consideration and Delivery of Possession

PLJ 2018 · Lahore High Court · 2018

PLJ 2018 Lahore 1042 Present : Ch. Muhammad Masood Jahangir, J. Mst. SURRAYA BIBI--Petitioner versus IMTIAZ AHMAD etc.--Respondents C.R. No. 2715 of 2014, decided 25.4.2018. Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908)-- ----S

Party cannot improve its case beyond pleadings

PLJ 2018 Lahore 1042 · Lahore High Court · 2018

PLJ 2018 Lahore 1042 Present : Ch. Muhammad Masood Jahangir, J. Mst. SURRAYA BIBI--Petitioner versus IMTIAZ AHMAD etc.--Respondents C.R. No. 2715 of 2014, decided 25.4.2018. Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908)-- ----S

Arbitration Judgment in Aviation Case by Supreme Court of Pakistan

PLJ 2018 SC 504 · Sindh High Court · 2018

PLJ 2018 SC 504 [Appellate Jurisdiction] Present : Mian Saqib Nisar, CJ, Faisal Arab & Ijaz-ul-Ahsan, JJ. GERRY’S INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LTD.--Appellant versus AEROFLOT RUSSIAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES--Respondent Civil Appe

Litigation is notice to public at large

PLJ 2017 Lahore 740 · Lahore High Court · 2017

PLJ 2017 Lahore 740 [Bahawalpur Bench Bahawalpur] Present : Tariq Iftikhar Ahmad, J. MUHAMMAD AFZAL--Appellant versus FAIZ AHMED etc,--Respondents R.S.As. No. 8 & 11 of 2011, decided on 5.4.2017. Transfer of Property Act

Contract which is in its nature revocable cannot be specifically enforced

PLJ 2016 · Sindh High Court · 2016

PLJ 2016 Karachi 8 Present : Muhammad Ali Mazhar , J. SHAHZAD TRADE LINKS through Sole Proprietor, Karachi and another--Plaintiffs versus MTW PAK ASSEMBLING INDUSTRIES (PRIVATE) LIMITED through Representative, Karachi an

Rent Matters Shall be decided in 4 months

Not specified · 2015

The Rent Controller is the judge who has to decided a rent petition filed in his/her court. Rent matters are filed in shape of petitions and the same are responded by persons against whom they are filed. The most common

Warrant of Possession

Not specified · 2015

Warrant of Possession is a term used for a legal document issued by the court for taking assistance from the local police for taking possession of a certain property. There are matters in which people often do not comply

Ex-Parte Decree in a Guardian case can be set-aside

PLJ 2015 Lahore 748 · Lahore High Court · 2015

PLJ 2015 Lahore 748 Present: Muhammad Khalid Mehmood Khan , J. MUHAMMAD QAYYUM & 6 others --Petitioners Versus HAQ NAWAZ DOGAR and another --Respondents Civil Revision No. 2994 of 2004, heard on 13.4.2015. Civil Procedur

Suit for Possession through Ejectment

PLJ 2015 · Peshawar High Court · 2015

PLJ 2015 Peshawar 175 Present: Abdul Latif Khan , J. AMJAD ALI and 7 others --Petitioners versus ANWAR SHAH & 10 others --Respondents C.R. No. 1866 of 2010, decided on 25.2.2015. Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908)--

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

Not specified · 2014

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. ACT NO. V OF 1908 [21st March 1908] An Act to consolidate and amend the laws relating to the Procedure of the Courts of Civil Judicature. WHEREAS it is expedient to consolidate and amend th

Surrender Deed Specimen

Not specified · 2014

Surrender Deed This Deed of Surrender_________ made this _________day of__________, between _________ age about ______ , occupation _________, residing at ___________________________, at________of the FIRST PART AND ____

Consent decree is not applicable on those who are not party in a case

PLJ 2014 AJ&K 76 · Azad Jammu & Kashmir High Court · 2014

PLJ 2014 AJ&K 76 Present: Sardar Abdul Hameed Khan, J. CH. MUHAMMAD YOUNAS ARVI and 3 others --Petitioners versus MUSHTAQ AHMED and 6 others --Respondents Revision Petition No. 46 of 2008, decided on 9.4.2013. Civil Proc

Essential Documents for decision can be produced after additional evidence petition acceptance

PLJ 2014 · Lahore High Court · 2014

PLJ 2014 Lahore 28 Present: Mehmood Maqbool Bajwa , J. MUHAMMAD FAYYAZ (deceased) through LRs etc.--Petitioners versus SAEED AHMAD (deceased) through LRs. etc.--Respondents C.R. No. 2907 of 2012, decided on 12.4.2013. Ci

Evidence Act: Correctness of document test

PLJ 2014 Peshawar 26 · Peshawar High Court · 2014

PLJ 2014 Peshawar 26 Present: Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel , J. Mst . ZAKIA BEGUM & others--Petitioners versus MIAN ABDULLAH SHAH & others--Respondents C.R. No. 1713 of 2010 with C.O.C. No. 52-P of 2012, decided on 7.10.201

Property can be attached during execution of Decree

PLJ 2014 · Balochistan High Court · 2014

PLJ 2014 Quetta 65 Present: Mrs. Syeda Tahira Safdar , J. Syed ZIA-UD-DIN etc. --Appellants versus SHABIR AHMED and others --Respondents Civil Misc. Appeal Nos. 26 of 2005 and 3 of 2006, decided on 30.4.2013. Civil Proce

THE TRUSTS ACT, 1882 ACT No. II of 1882 [13th January, 1882]

Not specified · 2014

An Act to define and amend the law relating to Private Trusts and Trustees. WHEREAS it is expedient to define and amend the law relating to private trusts and trustees; It is hereby enacted as follows : CHAPTER I PRELIMI

Judgment on Section 8 of Code of Civil Procedure

PLJ 2014 SC 835 · Peshawar High Court · 2014

PLJ 2014 SC 835 [Appellate Jurisdiction] Present: Nasir-Ul-Mulk , Mian Saqib Nisar & Amir Hani Muslim, JJ. HAZRATULLAH and others --Appellants versus RAHIM GUL and others --Respondents Civil Appeal No. 172 of 2005, decid

Jurisdiction of High Court to grant or refuse Injunction

PLJ 2014 · Balochistan High Court · 2014

PLJ 2014 Quetta 80 (DB) Present: Jamal Khan Mandokhail and Ghulam Mustafa Mengal , JJ. MUHAMMAD RABANI, SALES DIRECTOR DALDA FOOD (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI & others --Appellants versus AGHA ARSHAD, MARKETING, DISTRIBUTOR OF D

THE TRUST ACT 1882

Not specified · 2013

Preamble [Act No.2 Of 1882] [13th January 1882] An Act to define and amend the law relating to Private Trusts and Trustees. WHEREAS it is expedient to define and amend the law relating to private trusts and trustees; it

Tenancy can be inherited under section 19-A

PLJ 2013 SC 620 · Lahore High Court · 2013

PLJ 2013 SC 620 [Appellate Jurisdiction] Present: Nasir-Ul-Mulk & Amir Hani Muslim, JJ. SAEED-UD-DIN and others--Appellants versus HAFEEZ BEGUM and others--Respondents Civil Appeal No. 1143 of 2011, decided on 21.2.2013.

Transaction with Pardanesheen Ladies

PLJ 2013 SC 37 · Lahore High Court · 2013

PLJ 2013 SC 37 [Appellate Jurisdiction] Present: Ejaz Afzal Khan & Muhammad Ather Saeed, JJ. Syed SHARIF-UL-HASSAN (decd.) through L.Rs.--Appellants versus Hafiz MUHAMMAD AMIN and others--Respondents C.A. No. 1130 of 200

Eviction Order under Cantonment Rent Restriction Act 1963

PLJ 2013 SC 13 · Lahore High Court (Rawalpindi Bench) · 2013

PLJ 2013 SC 13 [Appellate Jurisdiction] Present: Ejaz Afzal Khan and Ijaz Ahmed Chaudhry , JJ. IMRAN LATIF and another--Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD SAIM JALIL and others--Respondents Civil Petitions No. 1234 & 1026 of 20

Impleadment as party in Rent Appeal

PLJ 2013 · Lahore High Court · 2013

PLJ 2013 Lahore 519 Present: Abdus Sattar Asghar , J. IFTIKHAR AHMAD KHAN--Petitioner versus MUHAMMAD QAYYUM, etc.--Respondents W.P. No. 16912 of 2013, decided on 3.7.2013. Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908)-- ----O.

Mistake in Evidence can be ractified

PLJ 2013 · Lahore High Court · 2013

PLJ 2013 Lahore 633 Present: Abdus Sattar Asghar , J. KAMEER and another--Appellants versus ABDUL MAJEED--Respondent R.S.A. No. 145 of 2004, heard on 25.2.2013. Qanun -e- Shahadat Order, 1984 (10 of 1984)-- ----Arts. 70

Review of Order of Board

PLJ 2013 · Sindh High Court · 2013

PLJ 2013 Karachi 16 (DB ) [Bench at Sukkur] Present: Shahid Anwar Bajwa & Muhammad Ali Mazhar, JJ. ABID ALI BAIG & others--Petitioners versus ZAFAR ALI & others--Respondents C.P. Nos. D-389 of 2007 and D-84 of 2009, deci

Application to produce additional documents

PLJ 2012 Lahore 144 · Lahore High Court · 2012

PLJ 2012 Lahore 144 Present: Mehmood Maqbool Bajwa, J. MOAZAM MAJEED BAJWA--Petitioner versus TARIQ MUNAWAR etc.--Respondents C.R. No. 1537 of 2011, decided on 11.10.2011. Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908)-- ----O.

Can trial court recall its own order

PLJ 2012 Lahore 89 · Lahore High Court (Rawalpindi Bench) · 2012

PLJ 2012 Lahore 89 [Rawalpindi Bench Rawalpindi] Present: Ch. Muhammad Tariq, J. Malik MUHAMMAD NIAZ--Petitioner versus MUHAMMAD AYUB etc.--Respondents C.R. No. 376 of 2008 and F.A.O. No. 40 of 2010, heard on 15.3.2011.

THE CONTRACT ACT, 1872 of Pakistan

Not specified · 2012

PRELIMINARY 1. Short title Extent Commencement Enactments repealed 2. Interpretation-clause CHAPTER I OF THE COMMUNICATION, ACCEPTANCE AND REVOCATION OF PROPOSALS 3. Communication, acceptance and revocation of proposals

THE SPECIFIC RELIIEF ACT, 1877

Not specified · 2012

CONTENTS SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title Local Extent Commencement 2. [Repealed] 3. Interpretation-clause Words defined in Contract Act 4. Savings 5. Specific relief how given 6. Preventive relief 7. Relief no

Objections on Local Commission Report Judgment

PLJ 2012 · Lahore High Court · 2012

PLJ 2012 Lahore 511 Present: Muhammad Khalid Mehmood Khan, J. REHMAT ALI--Appellant versus Mst . RABIA BEGUM and 10 others--Respondents R.S.A. No. 89 of 2000, heard on 28.4.2010. Rendition of Account-- ----Local commissi

Determination of Benami Transaction

PLJ 2011 SC 834 · Peshawar High Court · 2011

PLJ 2011 SC 834 [Appellate Jurisdiction] Present: Javed Iqbal, Raja Fayyaz Ahmed & Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, JJ. Mst. ASIA BIBI--Appellant versus Dr. ASIF ALI KHAN, etc.--Respondents Civil Appeal No. 952 of 2010, decided on

Wakalatnama and Special Power of Attorney attested in foreign country

PLJ 2011 · Lahore High Court · 2011

PLJ 2011 Lahore 376 Present: Mansoor Akbar Kokab, J. KHALID MAZHAR and 5 others--Petitioners versus ZAFAR HUSSAIN--Respondent C.R. No. 208-D of 1996, heard on 27.4.2010. Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908)-- ----O. II

Mortgage can be benami also

PLJ 2010 SC 867 · Peshawar High Court · 2010

PLJ 2010 SC 867 [Appellate Jurisdiction] Present: M. Javed Buttar & Ijaz-ul-Hassan, JJ. MUHAMMAD ILYAS and others--Appellants versus Mst. AMRAIZAN and another--Respondents Civil Appeal No. 2237 of 2001, decided on 16.12.

What makes a transaction benami under the law?

PLJ 2010 SC 846 · Lahore High Court · 2010

PLJ 2010 SC 846 [Appellate Jurisdiction] Present: Sardar Muhammad Raza Khan & Raja Fayyaz Ahmed, JJ. GHULAM MURTAZA--Appellant versus Mst. ASIA BIBI and others--Respondent Civil Appeals No. 1378, 1379 and 1380 of 2006, d

Rent Controller cannot determine title of property

PLJ 2010 SC 910 · Balochistan High Court · 2010

PLJ 2010 SC 910 [Appellate Jurisdiction] Present: Muhammad Akhtar Shabbir & Syed Sakhi Hussain Bukhari, JJ. AHMAD ALI alias ALI AHMAD--Appellant versus NASAR-UD-DIN and another--Respondents Civil Appeal No. 917 of 2005 o

Who has to check the status of case at High Court?

PLJ 2009 SC 272 · Balochistan High Court · 2009

PLJ 2009 SC 272 [Appellate Jurisdiction] Present: Abdul Hameed Dogar, C.J., Ijaz-ul-Hassan & Ch. Ejaz Yousaf, JJ. GHULAM SIDDIQUE and another--Petitioners versus MALIK MUHAMMAD QASIM--Respondent C.P. No. 45-Q of 2008, de

Contents of Plaint are important for Rejection of Plaint

PLJ 2009 · Sindh High Court · 2009

PLJ 2009 Karachi 205 Present: Gulzar Ahmed, J. Messrs SUNLEY DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED through Authorised Officer, Karachi --Plaintiff versus Messrs MUMAIR ASSOCIATES through Attorney and others--Defendants Suit No. 9 a

Forthwith means without further adjournment

PLJ 2008 SC 1059 · Lahore High Court (Rawalpindi Bench) · 2008

PLJ 2008 SC 1059 [Appellate Jurisdiction] Present: Abdul Hameed Dogar, C.J. Ijaz-ul-Hassan & Ch. Ejaz Yousaf, JJ. MUHAMMAD ASLAM--Petitioner versus NAZIR AHMED--Respondent C.P.L.A. No. 916 of 2007, decided on 1.1.2008. (

Termination of Agency of Contract

PLJ 2007 · Sindh High Court · 2007

PLJ 2007 Karachi 207 Present: Maqbool Baqar, J Messrs TIME N VISIONS INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LTD.--Plaintiff versus DUBAI ISLAMIC BANK PAKISTAN LIMITED--Defendant Suit No. 862 of 2006, decided on 30.8.2006. Arbitration Act,

Justice Delayed is Justice Denied

PLD 2006 Lah. 255 · Lahore High Court · 2006

P L D 2009 Lahore 76 Before Sayed Zahid Hussain, C.J. HIBBATUL MANNAN KHALID OMAR and others---Petitioners Versus DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE and others---Respondents C.R.No.1094 of 2008, decided on 6th October, 2008. Adminis

How to establish right of Pre-emption?

PLJ 2004 · Lahore High Court · 2004

PLJ 2004 Lahore 1211 Present: muhammad muzammal khan, J. RIAAZ AHMAD-Petitioner versus MUHAMMAD SADIQ-Respondent C.R. No. 2455-D of 1996, decided on 2.1.2004. Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1991 (IX of 1991)-- —-S. 13-Civil Pro

Second Appeal in a Haq Shufa Case

PLD 2003 SC 818). · Supreme Court of Pakistan · 2003

JUDGMENT SHEET LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT RSA No.182/2011 (Lehrasib Khan vs. Umeed Ali etc.) JUDGMENT Date of Hearing: 05.03.2012 Appellant by: Ch. M. Lehrasib Khan Gondal, Advocate. Respondents by: Sh

Necessary and Proper Parties in Law

PLD 2002 SC · Sindh High Court · 2002

2014 C L C 261 [Sindh] Before Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi and Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar, JJ Mirza AFZAL BAIG----Appellant Versus MUDABBIR ALI KHAN and others----Respondents High Court Appeal No.4 of 2012, decided on 11th October, 2

International Lawyer Law Firm

PLJ 1999 · Sindh High Court · 1999

PLJ 1999 Karachi 181 Present: MUSHTAQ AHMAD MEMON, J. FAIZOO and others-Appellants versus RAEES BAQAR, KHAN and others-Respondents F.A. No. 25 of 1980, decided on 24.9.1997. (i) Administration of Jwstiee- —Any step which

Critereon for determining Benami Transaction

PLJ 1998 Karachi 1 · Sindh High Court · 1998

PLJ 1998 Karachi 1 Present: rana BHAGWAN das, J. SYED HABIB MAHMOOD-Plaintiff versus Mrs. BILQEES FATIMA-Defendant . Suit No. 444 of 1989 dismissed on 8.8.1996. (i) Benami Transaction-- —Criteria for determining question

Re-Examination after Final Arguments

PLJ 1998 · Sindh High Court · 1998

PLJ 1998 Karachi 328 Present: DR. GHOUS MUHAMMAD, J. NAZIR HUSSAIN-Appellant versus ABDUL MANAN--Respondent Revision Application No. 201 of 1996, dismissed in limine on 4.9.1997. Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908)- —

Jurisdiction of Rent Controller

PLJ 1996( Karachi) 156 · Sindh High Court · 1996

PLJ 1996( Karachi) 156 [Rent Appellate Jurisdiction] Present: ABDUL MAJID KHANZADA, J. BASHIR AHMAD MUNIR-Appellant versus Mrs. TAHIRA QURESHI-Respondent First Rent Appeal No. 586 of 1994 dismissed on 14-12-1995. (i) Sin

Justice Malik Qayyum's Judgment over Benami Transaction

PLJ 1992 Lahore 302 · Lahore High Court · 1992

PLJ 1992 Lahore 302 Present: MALIK MUHAMMAD QAYYUM, J AZMATULLAH-Petitioner versus Ch. ABDUL HAQ and others-Respondents Civil Revision No.1034 of 1981, dismissed on 5.5.1992. Benami Transaction- —Purchase of land by peti

Petitioners should be given chance of hearing

PLJ 1991 Lahore 165 · Lahore High Court · 1991

PLJ 1991 Lahore 165 Present: muhammad MuxiR khan, J Maj. PERVEZ SHAKOOR and 4 others-Petitioners versus MUHAMMAD USMAN-Respondent. Civil Revision No.1.831 of 1990, accepted on 2.10.1990. Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of

Is the court bound to serve notices before passing withdrawal order?

PLD 1990 SC 596) and Ismail vs. Fida Ali and Syyed Iqbal Shabbir (PL · Supreme Court of Pakistan · 1990

JUDGMENT SHEET LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT Civil Revision No.191/2006 (Fayyaz Ahmed vs. Tariq Bashir etc.) JUDGMENT Date of Hearing: 08.03.2012 Petitioner by: Mian Israr-ul-Haq, Advocate. Respondent No.

Women Rights Judgment on Article 25 clause (3)

PLJ 1990 SC 346 · Peshawar High Court · 1990

PLJ 1990 SC 346 [Appellate Jurisdiction] Present: MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH CJ AND RUSTAM S. SlDHWA J Mst. FATAL JAN-Petitioner versus ROSHAN DIN and 2 others-Respondents Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 9-R of 1990, a

Fresh suit is barred in case of dismissal in default

PLJ 1987 Lahore 532 · Lahore High Court · 1987

PLJ 1987 Lahore 532 Present : muhammad ilyas, J ABDUL HAQ—Petitioner versus Mst. GHULAM F ATI MA and 3 Others—Respondents Civil Revision No. 750 D of 1987, dismisssed on 6-6-1987 (i) Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908

Decision in a land matter without impleading all co-owners as parties

PLJ 1987 · Azad Jammu & Kashmir High Court · 1987

PLJ 1987 AJK   34 Present: ABDUL GHAFOOS, J GHULAM   MUHAMMAD-Appellant versus MUHAMMAD JAN and 4 Others—Respondents Civil Appeal No. 44 of 1936, allowed on 19-1-1987 (i)  Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908)— -------

An old urban rent judgment

PLJ 1982 SC 127; 1982 CLC 772 &. PLD 1972 Kar. 778 ref. · Supreme Court of Pakistan · 1982

P L J 1983 Qnettm 49 Before; muftakhiruddin, J MUHAMMAD YAQUB—Appellant versus Master MUHAMMAD SHAFI and Another—Respondents First Appeal from Original Order No, 31 of 1981. decided on 4-9-1982. (!) West Pakistan Urban R

Setting aside of Ex-Parte Decree

MLD 1305 and PLD 1970 SC 196   rel. · Azad Jammu & Kashmir High Court · 1970

2014 C L C 410 [High Court (AJ&K)] Before Sardar Abdul Hameed Khan, J Ch. MUHAMMAD YOUNAS ARVI and 3 others----Petitioners Versus MUSHTAQ AHMED and 6 others----Respondents Revision Petition No.46 of 2008, decided on 9th

H.C.A 16/2018 (D.B.) Ms. Asmat Ara & Another V/S Ms. Inayat Begum (Deceased) & Others

2026 SHC KHI 1366 · Sindh High Court · 2026

Section 53-A of Transfer of Possession Act, 1882 - Judicial construction, scope and applicability of Section 53-A - Part-performance cannot be invoked where possession arose solely from a tenancy, unless tenant has done

855/2021 Suit ISHRAT SWALEH (Plaintiff) V/S MST. FARZANA SHAIKH & OTHERS (Defendant)

Sindh High Court · 2022

under Order VII Rule 11 read with Section of 151 CPC Defendant No. 2, seeks rejection of the Plaint. suit for Specific Performance and Permanent Injunction. Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, an agreement between tw

84/2014 II.A. Pervaiz Iqbal (Appellant) V/S Faisal Akram (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2017

Foregoing are the reasons of the short order announced by me on 30.08.2017 whereby this appeal was allowed with no order as to costs, the impugned judgments and decrees were set aside and Suit No.563/2010 for specific pe

451/2016 Const. P. Ghulam Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2019

Sindh Tenancy Act, 1950

1040/2009 Suit NASIR ALI (Plaintiff) V/S SYED QAMAR HUSSAIN (Defendant)

Sindh High Court · 2023

Plaintiff Buyer, within the time prescribed in the contract, made part payment of the Sale Price, whereafter Defendant Seller handed over the first floor of the bungalow on the suit property to Plaintiff. Plaintiff Buyer

262/2018 Suit Deedar Ali Isran (Plaintiff) V/S Abdul Wahid & others (Defendant)

Sindh High Court · 2022

Under Order 07 Rule 2 CPC read with Section 151 of CPC, issues involved and discussed in order are; 1) Specific Performance, 2) Time Bar and 3) Doctrine of res judicata

327/1966 Suit Raza Hussain and others (Plaintiff) V/S Muhammad Khan and others (Defendant)

Sindh High Court · 2017

Suit for specific performance of agreement to sell. Directions to the Nazir to handover the possession of suit land to its claimants.

65/2005 Civil Revision Liaquat Ali alias Khabar and others (Applicant) V/S Habibullah and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

Concurrent finding of two courts below can be interfered with if the court lacked jurisdiction or a case of misreading and non reading of evidence is made out; a registered sale deed as against a mutation entry will have

1929/2018 Suit Akbar Adamjee. (Plaintiff) V/S Performance Automotive (Pvt) L:td., & Others. (Defendant)

Sindh High Court · 2019

Mandatory Injunction - Order 39 CPC - Specific Performance of an agreement- no settled formula to grant or refuse the same- dependent on facts of the case- mandatory injunction granted.

31/2016 F.R.A Dr.Muhammad Hassan (Appellant) V/S Additional Controller of Rents & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2020

(a) Cantonments Rent Restriction Act (XI of 1963)--- ----S.3---Rent Controller---Jurisdiction---Government building---Neither any other Court nor parties can confer jurisdiction on a Court / Tribunal when it is expressly

2110/2009 Const. P. Muhammad Tariq Qasmi (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2018

EJECTMENT AND RECOVERY OF POSSESSION

1862/2016 Const. P. M/S Dewan Sugar Mills Limited (Petitioner) V/S M/S Trading Corporation of Pakistan (Pvt) ltd & (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2017

Ousting the petitioner from availing their remedy which they could have before the executing Court amounts to a denial of fair trial. I am in agreement that such a compromise ought to have been recognized by executing Co

431/2011 Suit PSO (Plaintiff) V/S PROV.OF SINDH & ORS. (Defendant)

Sindh High Court · 2020

Property Tax on property of KPT is payable and is not exempt, whereas, the Plaintiff / Tenant pursuant to lease Agreement is liable to pay the same.

11/2016 II.A. Abdul Aziz (Appellant) V/S Abdul Kareem & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2022

Sale deed of appellant as being enjoyed by appellant cannot be set-aside automatically as the defence of the appellant is protected being buyer without notice of any dispute. As stated above it has to be proved independe

1482/1998 Suit Abdul Wahid (Plaintiff) V/S Deedar Ali Issran (Defendant)

Sindh High Court · 2017

Sale Deed registered in favour of defendants are valid documents and have been entered by the authorized Attorney (having registered sub-irrevocable general power of attorney which is in pursuance of earlier registered

2438/2017 Const. P. Syed Ali Abbas Rizvi Thr. Nisar Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S The Addl. Controller of Rents Clifton & Another (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2019

The petition is dismissed with costs as the impugned order is an interlocutory order and it does not suffer from any jurisdictional defect or error, this petition, being misconceived and malafide, is not maintainable. Th

1021/2014 Suit Muhammad Ali Zubair. (Plaintiff) V/S Sabira Khatoon & another. (Defendant)

Sindh High Court · 2015

(a) Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)--- ----S. 12---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XXIII, R. 3 & O. VII, R. 11---Suit for specific performance of agreement to sell---Compromise---Cause of action---Power-of-attorney-

2695/2017 Const. P. Syed Muhammad S/o Muhammad Anwar (Petitioner) V/S Noorullah & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

-The petitioner while making such statement of alleged purchase has not realized the burden he took over. There is a marked difference in the probative value of entering into possession for the first time as tenant, and

68/2016 Execution First Appeal JAWAID SARWAR (Decree Holder) V/S RANA MUNIR & ANOTHER (Judgment Debtor)

Sindh High Court · 2023

Decree for specific performance entails possession. Privity of contract. Compromise decree when executable.

135/2022 R.A (Civil Revision) Abdul Sami Kehar (Applicant) V/S Amanullah Dasti & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2024

Suit for Specific Performance of Contract: Oral Agreements: Detailed Proof Required in Legal ClaimsDiscussion: Proving an oral agreement to sell requires the plaintiff to specify the date, time, place, and witnesses, out

549/2008 Suit MOBEEN RAZA and another (Appellant) V/S M/S. ALLOO & MINOCHER DINSHAW (Appellant)

Sindh High Court · 2014

Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)--- ----S. 42---Suit for negative declaration seeking only the disentitlement of defendants in suit property---Maintainability---Interpretation of S.42, Specific Relief Act, 1877---Plaintif

40/2006 R.A (Civil Revision) Khadim Hussain and an others (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Ibrahim and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2022

Sale of property covered by Section 19 of the Colonization Act, 1910. Parties can enter into such sale and there is no legal bar however, the same can only be a deferred sale, specific performance of which was postponed

1331/2017 Suit Mst. Sufia Nasim & others (Plaintiff) V/S Muhammad Hasan Khan & another (Defendant)

Sindh High Court · 2022

specific performance

1644/2013 Suit Sheikh Muhammad Javaid (Plaintiff) V/S Sartaj Saqlain and others (Defendant)

Sindh High Court · 2018

(a) Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)--- ----S. 12---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Arts. 17 & 79---Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Art. 113 & S. 22---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. I, R. 10---Companies Ordinance (XLVII

234/2023 H.C.A Cedar Pvt. Ltd (Appellant) V/S Soneri Bank Ltd & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2024

*The subject matter of the suit is not just simply a negotiable instrument but it is the rent of the subject period which was not paid, therefore, there is no logic in saying that since the Rent Controller could not pass

2068/2016 Const. P. Gulistan Textiles Mills Limited (Petitioner) V/S VIIIth ADJ Karachi South & Another (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

- Similarly, a presumptive view in respect of overall inflation and rate of taxes cannot be applied. The maintenance claimed to have been made/done by the landlord/respondent and in support thereof they have filed some a

135/2019 R.A (Civil Revision) Muhammad Zakir S/o Abdul Malik (Applicant) V/S Muhammad Faisal and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2022

In principle, the applicant has lost his case; and, at the revision stage, he has agitated the grounds already exhausted by him and properly adjudicated by the competent forum including the plea that the suit filed by t

25/2021 F.R.A M/s. Nixor College (Pvt) Ltd and another (Appellant) V/S Dr. Suleiman Muhammad Al Suleiman (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2023

MRC. Where a landlord refused to accept rent, it was mandatory for the tenant first to remit the rent through postal money order and if that was not done, deposit of rent in Court would not absolve the tenant from being

69/2011 Civil Revision Muhammad Sharif, thr:L.Rs: (Applicant) V/S Abdul Razak, thr:L.Rs.and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2019

The applicant claimed to be in possession of the subject property, however, he was unable to demonstrate as to how he came in possession. The agreement is absolutely silent as far as delivery of possession is concerned.

1344/2016 Suit Aviserv Limited (Plaintiff) V/S Civil Aviation Authority (Defendant)

Sindh High Court · 2023

Specific performance of un-registered agreement to lease. The Plaintiff failed to demonstrate that it was ready and willing to perform the same. Stay application dismissed.

891/2019 Const. P. M/s United Business Machines thr Muhammad Aslam (Petitioner) V/S Ghulam Hussain Hidayatullah & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

-Section 15(2)(vii) of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979requires demonstration of elements such as (i) honesty of purpose and (ii) reasonableness. From the statement of landlord/owner for the purpose of eviction of a

214/1991 R.A (Civil Revision) Ameer Ahmed (Applicant) V/S Z.A. Khan (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2016

Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)--- ----S. 12----Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 23 & 24---Suit for specific performance of agreement---Proof---Inordinate delay of 40/45 years in disposal of the suit---Effect---Provision

21/2011 II.A. Mst. Kishwar Begum & Ors (Appellant) V/S Rasheed Ahmed Qureshi & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2018

Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)--- ----Ss. 12 & 54---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 12(2)---Suit for specific performance of agreement and permanent injunction---Agreement to sell---Proof of ownership of vendor---S

154/2021 Const. P. TARIQ MASOOD (Petitioner) V/S SHER MUHAMMAD DIN & OTHERS (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

The respondent may have proved the ownership of the property but then the relationship of landlord and tenant has to be established independently. It has to be proved through reliable evidence and documents that applican

381/2003 Suit Mall Nigran Welfare Association (Plaintiff) V/S Government of Sindh and others (Defendant)

Sindh High Court · 2018

Societies Registration Act (XXI of 1860)--- ----Ss.1 & 20---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Ss.12, 42 & 54--- Suit for specific performance of agreement to sell, declaration and injunction--- Power of court--- Aims and

29/2015 Judicial Companies Misc. Total Parco Pakistan limited & another (Applicant) V/S NA (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2022

This is not a conveyance or sale deed under Transfer of Property Act which requires registration and stamping under Registration Act and Stamp Act ibid, before Sub-Registrar; rather it is a Scheme of Arrangement not requ

749/2005 Suit DR. NAFEES ZUBAIR (Plaintiff) V/S MRS. SAEEDA BANO & ORS (Defendant)

Sindh High Court · 2022

Since the Defendant No.1 has accepted a substantial amount of rupees six million as part payment towards sale price, and never returned the same till the above Order was passed, which means for almost seven years the sam

1205/2005 Suit HASAN AHMAD (Plaintiff) V/S MUHAMMAD FAROOQ & ORS (Defendant)

Sindh High Court · 2023

Since sale transaction in respect of the Suit Property has been proved by Plaintiff, therefore, Specific Performance can be granted,

2870/2015 Const. P. Mushtaque Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Mumtaz Ahmed and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2018

The grounds assigned by the appellate Court while allowing the application under Order VII Rule 11 does not germane to the requirement for rejecting of plaint under Order VII Rule 11. This is no ground that the petitione

19/2014 F.R.A SHAM KUMAR S/O HUND RAJ (Appellant) V/S ULFAT SHAHEEN & ANOTHER (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2020

Cantonments Rent Restriction Act (XI of 1963)--- ----S. 17---Ejectment of tenant---Denial of relationship of landlord and tenant by the tenant---Default in payment of rent---Effect---Rent Controller accepted ejectment pe