General

12,461 judgments — showing 12201-12300

1406/2026 Const. P. Mst. Jawaria Juman (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In view of the above discussion, these petitions are disposed of with directions to respondent Nos. 1 to 5 to finalize and release all admitted retirement benefits of the petitioner within a period of thirty (30) days fr

667/2026 Const. P. Zahid (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

667/2026 Const. P. Zahid (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)

3510/2024 Const. P. Samira Mahamadi (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Consequently, these petitions are disposed of with direction to the Cantonment Board Clifton that they shall, in compliance with its earlier undertaking before this Court, ensure the provision of a regular and equitable

6962/2021 Const. P. Naeem Sadiq & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Consequently, these petitions are disposed of with direction to the Cantonment Board Clifton that they shall, in compliance with its earlier undertaking before this Court, ensure the provision of a regular and equitable

5959/2025 Const. P. Mst. Parveen (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

5959/2025 Const. P. Mst. Parveen (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

1925/2026 Const. P. Muhammad Hanief (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

When confronted with this legal position of the case, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks disposal of this petition in terms of statement so made by the counsel for the KMC. 5. Accordingly, the petition stands dispo

2006/2025 Const. P. Ehsan ur Rehman & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In view of the foregoing discussion, these petitions are disposed of with the following consolidated directions: 1. Joint demarcation of ROW vis-??-vis private lands in dispute shall be conducted within 60 days, as discu

574/2008 Const. P. Mst.Soni Mirani (Applicant) V/S Mst.Hurmat and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2008

574/2008 Const. P. Mst.Soni Mirani (Applicant) V/S Mst.Hurmat and others (Respondent)

122/2016 Const. P. Nooruddin Jatoi (Petitioner) V/S Deputy Controller Civ: Def: Kamber & ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Staff appointed on daily-wages cannot be regularized unless provided by statue or policy.

28/2010 Cr.Appeal Saifullah and another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2013

28/2010 Cr.Appeal Saifullah and another (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

374/2007 Suit Mohammad Saad & Nooruddin (Plaintiff) V/S Amna wife of Mohammad Siddiqui,M/s Bismillah Housing Services,M/s Alpine Constructions , Mukhtiarkar, Deputy Controller of Building and Province of Sindh. (Defendant)

Sindh High Court · 2007

374/2007 Suit Mohammad Saad & Nooruddin (Plaintiff) V/S Amna wife of Mohammad Siddiqui,M/s Bismillah Housing Services,M/s Alpine Constructions , Mukhtiarkar, Deputy Controller of Building and Province of Sindh. (Defendan

1108/2005 Suit M/S. HINA HOUSING PROJECT PVT. LTD. (Appellant) V/S V/S PROV. OF SINDH & ORS. (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2007

1108/2005 Suit M/S. HINA HOUSING PROJECT PVT. LTD. (Appellant) V/S V/S PROV. OF SINDH & ORS. (Respondent)

1290/2026 Const. P. Iqbal Rehmat (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In view of the statement made by the representative of KMC regarding finalization and readiness to release the admitted amount of pensionary benefits, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the petition furthe

468/2026 Const. P. Talha Rasheed Khan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

468/2026 Const. P. Talha Rasheed Khan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

5982/2025 Const. P. Gul Nawab (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

5982/2025 Const. P. Gul Nawab (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

103/2011 Const. P. Shahabuddin Barkat Ali & others (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Adnan and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2013

103/2011 Const. P. Shahabuddin Barkat Ali & others (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Adnan and others (Respondent)

591/2008 Const. P. Wahid Bux Soomro (Applicant) V/S S.H.O P.S Civil Line and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2008

591/2008 Const. P. Wahid Bux Soomro (Applicant) V/S S.H.O P.S Civil Line and others (Respondent)

2/2007 Adm. Suit Muhammad Ghazi Qureshi (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Mudasir (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2008

2/2007 Adm. Suit Muhammad Ghazi Qureshi (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Mudasir (Respondent)

2023/2011 Const. P. Zia Iqbal V/S Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Appellant) V/S Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2012

2023/2011 Const. P. Zia Iqbal V/S Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Appellant) V/S Fed of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)

49/2024 M.A. Atif Raza Saleh Thr. Attorney Muhammad Saleh Langa (Appellant) V/S Mst. Marium Anwar (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Courts will not interfere with dismissal for non-prosecution orders where the default is continuous and unexplained - Assertions of being busy before another Bench and stuck in traffic - Inconsistent explanations undermi

43/2026 Const. P. Ghaffar Ahmed @ Javed Ghaffar (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & 03 Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

43/2026 Const. P. Ghaffar Ahmed @ Javed Ghaffar (Petitioner) V/S P.O Sindh & 03 Others (Respondent)

1320/2026 Const. P. Asghar Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Learned A.A.G stated that the case concerns the construction of a petrol pump on Plot No.852, Pehlwan Goth, Gulistan-e-Jauhar, Karachi, without plan approval. He submitted that if the petitioner replies to the notice, a

1386/2026 Const. P. Ms. Fateh Mubeen Nizam (Petitioner) V/S Accountant General Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Learned AAG appearing on behalf of Respondent No.1 filed comments stating that the amount of leave encashment amounting to Rs.2,679,795/- had already been paid to the Petitioner on 05.05.2026 through the Office of the Ac

5229/2016 Const. P. Mehmood Salahuddin (Petitioner) V/S S.L.A.T & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

After examining the impugned judgment, we do not find that the discretion exercised by the Tribunal suffers from any jurisdictional defect, misreading of evidence, or violation of law warranting interference in constitut

3858/2016 Const. P. K.U.E.C.H.S (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Moreover, the record reflects that Respondent No.4 had made substantial payments towards the plot and had expressed willingness to clear any lawful outstanding dues; therefore, outright cancellation without proper adjudi

459/2011 Const. P. Muhammad Ashraf & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Haji jetha Bhai Gokul & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2011

459/2011 Const. P. Muhammad Ashraf & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Haji jetha Bhai Gokul & Ors (Respondent)

8006/2022 Const. P. Meer Sajjad Ahmed Shahwani (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In view of the foregoing discussion, these petitions are disposed of with the following consolidated directions: 1. Joint demarcation of ROW vis-??-vis private lands in dispute shall be conducted within 60 days, as discu

269/2026 Const. P. Ayaz Mahmood Chaudhry (Petitioner) V/S Petrocon (Pvt.) Ltd. & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

269/2026 Const. P. Ayaz Mahmood Chaudhry (Petitioner) V/S Petrocon (Pvt.) Ltd. & others (Respondent)

961/2026 Const. P. Fazal Jamal (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In such circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to complete the requisite exercise of the appointment of the petitioners within two month, to ensur

962/2026 Const. P. Muhammad Gaffar (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In such circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to complete the requisite exercise of the appointment of the petitioners within two month, to ensur

589/2008 Const. P. Muhammad Naseem (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Shameem Akhtar & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2010

589/2008 Const. P. Muhammad Naseem (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Shameem Akhtar & Ors (Respondent)

4/2006 Cr.Appeal Shahzeb and others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2013

4/2006 Cr.Appeal Shahzeb and others (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)

32/2012 Cr.Acctt.A Mansoor Ahmed S/O Qasim Mitha. (Appellant) V/S The State. (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

32/2012 Cr.Acctt.A Mansoor Ahmed S/O Qasim Mitha. (Appellant) V/S The State. (Respondent)

18/2024 I. A Aleem Thr: Attorney (Appellant) V/S Mst Lanjan & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Referee Court cannot reject Collector's reference on limitation. Section 30 disputes must be decided on merits. Appeals allowed.

972/2024 Const. P. Faqeer Muhammad & Others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Learned counsel for the Petitioners agreed with the aforesaid proposal; however, he requested that a decision be made by the competent authority within two weeks. The request seems to be reasonable and acceded to, subjec

1954/2026 Const. P. Aziz Hanif Soorty & another (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In the present case, since the Evacuee Trust Property Board has not only verified the petitioners??? documents but has also categorically stated that the property is not under its domain, and further in view of the conce

3551/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Khursheed and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Learned XIIth C.J/ J.M and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

3551/2016 Const. P. Muhammad Khursheed and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Learned XIIth C.J/ J.M and Ors (Respondent)

6266/2025 Const. P. Bihar Muslim Cooperative Housing Society Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, b

5004/2025 Const. P. Jaffar Abdul Majeed & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In view of the foregoing discussion, these petitions are disposed of with the following consolidated directions: 1. Joint demarcation of ROW vis-??-vis private lands in dispute shall be conducted within 60 days, as discu

6001/2024 Const. P. Akbar Ali & Another (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Another (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

federal government powers to amend schedule in CNS Act

596/2008 Const. P. Muhammad Ramzan Mirani (Applicant) V/S A.S.I Sikander Ali Mirani and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2008

596/2008 Const. P. Muhammad Ramzan Mirani (Applicant) V/S A.S.I Sikander Ali Mirani and others (Respondent)

143/2002 Cr.Appeal Munir Hussain (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2013

143/2002 Cr.Appeal Munir Hussain (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)

1060/2014 Suit REDTONE TELECOMMUNICATIONS PAKISTAN (PVT) LIMITED & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)

Sindh High Court · 2015

1060/2014 Suit REDTONE TELECOMMUNICATIONS PAKISTAN (PVT) LIMITED & OTHERS (Plaintiff) V/S FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN & OTHERS (Defendant)

30/2006 Suit NIL (Plaintiff) V/S NIL (Defendant)

Sindh High Court · 2008

30/2006 Suit NIL (Plaintiff) V/S NIL (Defendant)

1084/2011 Const. P. northern traders (Respondent) V/S nafisa (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2013

1084/2011 Const. P. northern traders (Respondent) V/S nafisa (Respondent)

1522/2024 Const. P. Shakeel Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S PTCL and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

1522/2024 Const. P. Shakeel Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S PTCL and Others (Respondent)

2/2005 Tr.A Party-1 (Applicant) V/S Party-2 (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2008

2/2005 Tr.A Party-1 (Applicant) V/S Party-2 (Respondent)

67/2026 Const. P. Sultan (Petitioner) V/S Hina Shaikh & Another (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Accordingly, without touching upon the merits of the rival claims and contentions of the parties, and with their consent, the instant petition along with all pending application(s) is disposed of with the direction that

1144/2025 Const. P. Kathiawar Coop Housing Society (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

As far as the issue of remaining encroachments is concerned, since the matter involves disputed questions of fact and requires continued administrative and possibly enforcement action, the Petitioner is at liberty to app

1297/2026 Const. P. Farha Niaz (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

1297/2026 Const. P. Farha Niaz (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

6273/2025 Const. P. Ashraf Godil & another (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, b

3668/2014 Const. P. Abdul Raheem Lakho (Petitioner) V/S ADDL: Chief Secratary And ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2014

3668/2014 Const. P. Abdul Raheem Lakho (Petitioner) V/S ADDL: Chief Secratary And ors (Respondent)

2296/2026 Const. P. Abdul Karim (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Accordingly, without expressing any final opinion on the merits of the procurement process itself, it is observed that the impugned decision of the Review Committee suffers from non-consideration of relevant issues and a

206/2026 Const. P. Muhammad Shehzad & Sameer (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In such circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to complete the requisite exercise of the appointment of the petitioners within two month, to ensur

528/2016 Const. P. Abdul Waheed and others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2016

528/2016 Const. P. Abdul Waheed and others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

346/2016 Cr.Appeal AAMIR S/O ASHIQ LASHARI & ANOTHER (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2017

346/2016 Cr.Appeal AAMIR S/O ASHIQ LASHARI & ANOTHER (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)

1660/2008 Const. P. Muhammad Yasin Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Yasir Shaikh (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2008

1660/2008 Const. P. Muhammad Yasin Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Yasir Shaikh (Respondent)

2380/2007 Const. P. Saadabad Corporation Housing Society (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Orw (Intervenor)

Sindh High Court · 2008

2380/2007 Const. P. Saadabad Corporation Housing Society (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Orw (Intervenor)

4390/2025 Const. P. Muhammad Jalal (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

4390/2025 Const. P. Muhammad Jalal (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)

4997/2025 Const. P. Ghulam Jeelani (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

4997/2025 Const. P. Ghulam Jeelani (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

559/2008 Const. P. Fakir Kamal Khan@Kamaluddin Chandio (Applicant) V/S S.H.O P.S Karan, Shikarpur and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2008

559/2008 Const. P. Fakir Kamal Khan@Kamaluddin Chandio (Applicant) V/S S.H.O P.S Karan, Shikarpur and others (Respondent)

354/2011 Cr.Appeal Muhammad Nadeem (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2012

354/2011 Cr.Appeal Muhammad Nadeem (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)

1748/2006 Const. P. Saifullah Khamisani (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan &Ors. (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2009

1748/2006 Const. P. Saifullah Khamisani (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan &Ors. (Respondent)

1881/2025 Const. P. Mst. Jawairia Juman (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In view of the above discussion, these petitions are disposed of with directions to respondent Nos. 1 to 5 to finalize and release all admitted retirement benefits of the petitioner within a period of thirty (30) days fr

6131/2022 Const. P. Roohi Rasheed & Another (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Consequently, these petitions are disposed of with direction to the Cantonment Board Clifton that they shall, in compliance with its earlier undertaking before this Court, ensure the provision of a regular and equitable

1382/2026 Const. P. William (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

1382/2026 Const. P. William (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

1959/2025 Const. P. Abid Abdullah (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In view of the foregoing discussion, these petitions are disposed of with the following consolidated directions: 1. Joint demarcation of ROW vis-??-vis private lands in dispute shall be conducted within 60 days, as discu

2172/2024 Const. P. Pakistan Legal United Society (DEPD) GOS (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In such circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to complete the requisite exercise of the appointment of the petitioners within two month, to ensur

351/2025 Const. P. Qazi Tariq Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

The reliance on Articles 4, 9, and 25 of the Constitution is also misplaced. No arbitrariness or mala fide has been shown in the decision-making process. The record reflects that the matter was duly placed before the com

404/2024 II.A. Karachi Metropolitan Corporation and others (Appellant) V/S Khalid Mehmood Siddiqui and another (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

404/2024 II.A. Karachi Metropolitan Corporation and others (Appellant) V/S Khalid Mehmood Siddiqui and another (Respondent)

349/2004 Cr.Appeal Haroon & 5 Ors (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2007

349/2004 Cr.Appeal Haroon & 5 Ors (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)

2194/2023 Const. P. Mst. Samina Naz (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Today, the officers present in Court have undertaken that the petitioner???s pensionary benefits shall be processed and credited into her account within a period of two weeks. It has further been assured that all formali

710/2023 Const. P. Azeemabad Coop Housing Society (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

710/2023 Const. P. Azeemabad Coop Housing Society (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

1920/2026 Const. P. Said Alam (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In view of the statement made by the representative of KMC regarding finalization and readiness to release the admitted amount of pensionary benefits, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the petition furthe

667/2008 Const. P. Noor Muhammad Patoojo (Applicant) V/S SHO P.S Behram and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2008

667/2008 Const. P. Noor Muhammad Patoojo (Applicant) V/S SHO P.S Behram and others (Respondent)

594/2008 Const. P. Shafqat Ali Sargani and others (Applicant) V/S D.P.O Larkana and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2008

594/2008 Const. P. Shafqat Ali Sargani and others (Applicant) V/S D.P.O Larkana and others (Respondent)

2504/2017 Const. P. Lal Muhammad Samoo (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

2504/2017 Const. P. Lal Muhammad Samoo (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)

1256/2026 Const. P. Amjad Khan (Petitioner) V/S Federal Government of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

1256/2026 Const. P. Amjad Khan (Petitioner) V/S Federal Government of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)

2188/2026 Const. P. Mst. Zulekha (Petitioner) V/S Chairman NADRA & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Accordingly, the respondents are directed to re-examine the petitioner???s claim along with all relevant records, particularly family-based identity documents, and determine the matter through a reasoned and speaking ord

1857/2025 Const. P. Sheeraz Ahmed (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In such circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to complete the requisite exercise of the appointment of the petitioners within two month, to ensur

648/2008 Const. P. Manzoor Ali Siyal (Applicant) V/S Secretary Educ. & Literacy Dept. and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2008

648/2008 Const. P. Manzoor Ali Siyal (Applicant) V/S Secretary Educ. & Literacy Dept. and others (Respondent)

1031/2025 Criminal Miscelleneous MUHAMMAD SHEHZAD S/O ABDUL RASHEED (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ORS (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

1031/2025 Criminal Miscelleneous MUHAMMAD SHEHZAD S/O ABDUL RASHEED (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & ORS (Respondent)

5786/2025 Const. P. Muhammad Nadeem Khan (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

For the foregoing reasons, these petitions are disposed of with directions to Respondents No.2 to 5 to ensure payment of the outstanding retirement and pensionary benefits of the petitioners strictly in accordance with t

6275/2025 Const. P. Muhammad Younus & another (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, b

6276/2025 Const. P. Faiyaz Ahmed & another (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, b

465/2006 Suit Mrs. ALBA D?SA and others (Plaintiff) V/S Ms. Naheed Pabani and Ali Allarakia (Defendants 1 and 2) (Defendant)

Sindh High Court · 2008

465/2006 Suit Mrs. ALBA D?SA and others (Plaintiff) V/S Ms. Naheed Pabani and Ali Allarakia (Defendants 1 and 2) (Defendant)

1059/2024 Const. P. Tahir Muhammad S/o Dost Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Faiza and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

1059/2024 Const. P. Tahir Muhammad S/o Dost Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S Mst. Faiza and others (Respondent)

2352/2025 Const. P. Aslam Faqira (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

2352/2025 Const. P. Aslam Faqira (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

5684/2023 Const. P. Mrs. Raana Hyder Zaiid (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Consequently, these petitions are disposed of with direction to the Cantonment Board Clifton that they shall, in compliance with its earlier undertaking before this Court, ensure the provision of a regular and equitable

6271/2025 Const. P. Nasim Cooperative Housing Society Limited (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Accordingly, all the above-captioned constitutional petitions, along with the listed application, are disposed of in the above terms. The parties shall, after the decision of the Hon???ble Federal Constitutional Court, b

5169/2023 Const. P. Mumtaz Majeed (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In view of the foregoing discussion, these petitions are disposed of with the following consolidated directions: 1. Joint demarcation of ROW vis-??-vis private lands in dispute shall be conducted within 60 days, as discu

5783/2023 Const. P. Aslam Shakoor (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Nevertheless, by way of last indulgence, the respondents are granted a further period of two (02) months to ensure release and payment of all outstanding pensionary and post-retirement benefits of the petitioners strictl

27/2026 Const. P. M/s. SSS Corporation (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Nevertheless, it is equally well-settled that public procurement and management of public assets must strictly conform to the principles of transparency, fairness, equality of opportunity, and compliance with Articles 4,

1290/2014 Const. P. aaa (Petitioner) V/S dzfbvdfb (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2014

1290/2014 Const. P. aaa (Petitioner) V/S dzfbvdfb (Respondent)

966/2025 Const. P. Kamran (Petitioner) V/S Rafiuddin Paracha & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

966/2025 Const. P. Kamran (Petitioner) V/S Rafiuddin Paracha & Others (Respondent)

1127/2024 Const. P. Noor Muhammad (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Subsequently, a progress report was submitted following a joint site visit. It stated that mining operations had already been stopped, no Ratti Bajri was found at the site, and the permits were limited to limestone and m

4547/2025 Const. P. Muhram Ali (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

Accordingly, these petitions along with pending application(s) are disposed of with directions to the Inspector General of Police, Sindh, to reconsider the petitioner???s candidature for the subject post. However their c

5774/2025 Const. P. Aftab Jhangir (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

5774/2025 Const. P. Aftab Jhangir (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & others (Respondent)

487/2026 Const. P. Muhammad Yousuf Iqbal & others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2026

In such circumstances of the case, we deem it appropriate to direct the Government of Sindh / concerned head of the DRCs to complete the requisite exercise of the appointment of the petitioners within two month, to ensur

65/2008 Const. P. Mst: Umrah Kalhoro (Applicant) V/S P.O Sindh & ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2008

65/2008 Const. P. Mst: Umrah Kalhoro (Applicant) V/S P.O Sindh & ors (Respondent)