👋 Welcome, visitor from Columbus, US!

Bail refused in case of prima facie involvement of accused

Criminal Law2012
Share on WhatsApp

Citation Name : 2012 YLR 626 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Side Appellant : ABDUL LATIF Side Opponent : State S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.380/392/365-B/34---Theft, robbery, abduction---Bail, refusal of---Abductee in her statement recorded under S.161, Cr.P.C., had elaborately given the facts regarding robbery committed in the house, her abduction, asking her uncle for ransom for her release and repeated assaults of zina-bil-jabr on her by the accused---Accused being not known to the parents of the abductee, his name could not be mentioned in the F.I.R. and such fact had indicated absence of mala fides on the part of the complainant or his daughter---If abductee had married the accused for love and with free-will, her false name could not have been mentioned in the nikahnama ---Abductee was present in the court and she had clearly and categorically owned the contents of her statement made under S.161, Cr.P.C.---Accused, prima facie, was connected with the offence alleged in the F.I.R.---Bail was refused to accused, in circumstances.

This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Procedure in cases of Guardian Cases

Not specified · 2020

There are Special Proceedings for Lunatics in the Court of Law

Not specified · 2016

The Punjab Protection of Women against Violence Act 2015

Not specified · 2016

The Transfer of Property Act, 1882

Not specified · 2016

Anti-Money Laundering Act, 20 10

Not specified · 2015