91/2020 II.A. Ezaz Farooq S/o. Abid Hussain (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Aslam S/o. Karim Bux (Respondent)

Sindh High Court2026

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author)

Share on WhatsApp
91/2020 II.A. Ezaz Farooq S/o. Abid Hussain (Appellant) V/S Muhammad Aslam S/o. Karim Bux (Respondent) Sindh High Court Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jawad Akbar Sarwana(Author) Order Date: 22-JAN-26 It is now well accepted that in a case of malicious prosecution, the plaintiff must show that the criminal action taken against him was decided in his favour and reasons such as clear judicial observation and/or determination in that judgment that the FIR was found fake, or it was lodged with malice, is not mandatory and will have no effect on the outcome of the subsequent claim of the plaintiff based on the tort of malicious prosecution.
Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Red Notices against Foreign National Proclaimed Offender

PLJ 2024 Karachi 138 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2024

Judgment on Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act 2012

PLJ 2023 Karachi 124 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2023

Domestic Violence (Prevention and Protection) Act 2013 explained in a Judgment

PLJ 2022 Cr.C. (Note) 154 · Sindh High Court · 2022

Article 140- Cross Examination of a Witness

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020

Re-Examination is more important than Examination in Chief

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020