89/2016 II.A. Naseem Akhtar (Appellant) V/S Abdur Rehman (Respondent)

Sindh High CourtCivil Law2016

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)

89/2016 II.A. Naseem Akhtar (Appellant) V/S Abdur Rehman (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author) Order Date: 14-NOV-16

Section 100 of CPC is discussed The Appellant through the instant second appeal has challenged the concurrent findings of the lower court. Section 100 CPC was examined and it was observed that in order to succeed in second appeal on ground (b) of subsection (1) of Section l00, C.P.C., an appellant would have to show that the court of first appeal would have reached a different conclusion, had it not failed to decide the issue of law or usage specified in ground (b) above. The Ground (c) of subsection (i) of Section l00, C.P.C., requires an appellant to show firstly that there has been a substantial error or defect in procedure and secondly that such substantial error could have resulted in an erroneous or defective decision of the case.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.

This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

89/2016 II.A. Naseem Akhtar (Appellant) V/S Abdur Rehman (Respondent)

Related judgments

Suit for Damages on Malicious Prosecution can be filed within one year

Party can be added at any stage of the Trial

Permission to produce documents under order 13 rule 2

Right to sue in case of Benamidar has six years limitation

There is difference between Power of Attorney and Will