877/2020 Const. P. Sarvech Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S NAB and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High CourtBanking & Corporate2020

Bench: Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon

877/2020 Const. P. Sarvech Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S NAB and Others (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon Order Date: 04-DEC-20

Both these petitions are allowed, however, with no order as to costs. Resultantly, the impugned orders of removal of the petitioners from service are hereby set aside and their cases are remanded back to the competent authority of NAB for holding regular inquiry against them after providing opportunity of hearing / representation to them strictly in accordance with law, which exercise shall be completed within three (03) months from the date hereof. Needless to say the question of granting back benefits to the petitioners shall depend upon the outcome of the inquiry to be held in pursuance of this judgment.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.

This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

877/2020 Const. P. Sarvech Shaikh (Petitioner) V/S NAB and Others (Respondent)

Related judgments

Admission must be clear, specific and unambiguous

Const. P. 6075/2024 (D.B.) Amir Rehman V/S Govt of Sindh & Others

1630/1998 Suit NOTHERN POLYTHENE LTD (NPL) (Plaintiff) V/S NAT BANK OF PAK & ORS (Defendant)

71/2008 Suit.B SONERI BANK LTD (Plaintiff) V/S CLASSIC DENIM MILLS PVT LTD (Respondent)

3/2013 I. A Soofi Rice Mills & Others (Appellant) V/S N.B.P & Others (Respondent)