86/2012 Suit Muhammad Nazim (Plaintiff) V/S Anwar Hussain Darbari (Defendant)

Sindh High Court2014

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar

Share on WhatsApp
86/2012 Suit Muhammad Nazim (Plaintiff) V/S Anwar Hussain Darbari (Defendant) Sindh High Court Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar Order Date: 28-APR-14 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----O. VII, R.11---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), S.12---Contract Act (IX of 1872), S.23---Suit for specific performance---Rejection of plaint---Plaintiff entered into agreement to sell with defendant in respect of property which belonged to his son, who was real owner of the suit property---Validity---Plaintiff's agreement with defendant was without permission of original owner who never consented to the agreement and refused to execute power of attorney in favour of defendant---No privity of contract existed between the plaintiff and the real owner of the suit property---Plaintiff knew that the agreement was dependent upon execution of General Power of Attorney by original owner who was not under any obligation to execute the power of attorney---Defendant had no authority to enter into an agreement to sell in respect of property which did not belong to him---Agreement was, therefore, not for lawful object in terms of S.23 of the Contract Act, 1872 as the same involved injury to the property of another person---Plaintiff had no cause of action---Plaint was rejected.
Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Red Notices against Foreign National Proclaimed Offender

PLJ 2024 Karachi 138 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2024

Judgment on Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act 2012

PLJ 2023 Karachi 124 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2023

Domestic Violence (Prevention and Protection) Act 2013 explained in a Judgment

PLJ 2022 Cr.C. (Note) 154 · Sindh High Court · 2022

Article 140- Cross Examination of a Witness

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020

Re-Examination is more important than Examination in Chief

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020