👋 Welcome, visitor from Columbus, US!

859/2017 Suit Agha Imtiaz Ali Khan Babar and others (Plaintiff) V/S The Federation of Pakistan and others (Defendant)

Sindh High CourtCompany Law2017

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar

Share on WhatsApp

859/2017 Suit Agha Imtiaz Ali Khan Babar and others (Plaintiff) V/S The Federation of Pakistan and others (Defendant) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar Order Date: 31-JUL-17

Companies Ordinance (XLVII of 1984) --- ----Ss. 178, 180, 181 & 183---Public Sector Companies (Corporate Governance) Rules, 2013, R. 5---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XXXIX, Rr. 1 & 2---Electric Power Company---Board of Directors of company---Reconstitution of---Removal of a "Nominee Director"---Scope---Suit for declaration---Temporary injunction, grant of---Plaintiffs were nominated as Directors of Electric Power Company---Contention of plaintiffs was that they could not be removed except in accordance with the Companies Ordinance, 1984---Validity---Plaintiffs were not elected Directors of the Company---Notification with regard to appointment of defendant as Director of the Company was impugned in the earlier suit by one of the earlier Nominee Directors but plaintiffs despite having knowledge of the same did not contest the said suit nor attempted to become party in the same to protect their right, if any---Plaintiffs, therefore, had not approached the court with clean hands---Provisions of S.178, 180 or 181 of Companies Ordinance, 1984 were not applicable to the Directors appointed under S.183 of the Ordinance---Nominee Directors had no vested right to hold the office for any specified period---Powers of "removal" of a "Nominee Director" was inherent power of the Authority which nominated him---Nominee Director would hold the office "during the pleasure" of the Authority which nominated him---Plaintiffs having claimed a definite amount of damages as compensation on account of the alleged omissions or failure of discharge of duty by the Authority would lose their right to seek restraining orders (injunction) on the ground of irreparable loss---Application for grant of injunction to suspend the impugned notification was refused in circumstances.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Arbitration Award can be set aside with consent of parties

PLJ 2014 SC 950 · Sindh High Court · 2014

Alienation of Property Judgment

PLJ 2011 Karachi 120 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2011

299/2021 H.C.A Asif Siddik Adam (Appellant) V/S Siddiki Fun Trust & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2023

4/2011 H.C.A Salehbhoy through LRs (In person) (Appellant) V/S M/s. Pak Maniar Investment (Pvt.) Limited and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2012

223/2008 H.C.A Abdul Rasheed & Ors. (Appellant) V/S Abdul Ghani & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2011