👋 Welcome, visitor from Columbus, US!

848/2020 Const. P. M/S. ADAMJEE IMPEX (Petitioner) V/S SHAIKH MUHAMMAD KHALID & OTHERS (Respondent)

Sindh High CourtProperty & Rent2021

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)

Share on WhatsApp

848/2020 Const. P. M/S. ADAMJEE IMPEX (Petitioner) V/S SHAIKH MUHAMMAD KHALID & OTHERS (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) Order Date: 19-APR-21

In view of above, I found that the orders passed under section 16(2) of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 was harsh inasmuch as it struck off the defence without a proper scrutiny of ledgers ofthe rent that has already been deposited in MRC, interestingly in the name of same landlord and there could have been no inconvenience to the respondent/landlord for the recovery of amount from such MRC.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Arbitration Judgment in Aviation Case by Supreme Court of Pakistan

PLJ 2018 SC 504 · Sindh High Court · 2018

Contract which is in its nature revocable cannot be specifically enforced

PLJ 2016 · Sindh High Court · 2016

Review of Order of Board

PLJ 2013 · Sindh High Court · 2013

Contents of Plaint are important for Rejection of Plaint

PLJ 2009 · Sindh High Court · 2009

Termination of Agency of Contract

PLJ 2007 · Sindh High Court · 2007