82/2019 Criminal Appeal MUMTAZ @ MUMTAZ ALI & ANOTHER (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)

Sindh High Court2022

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author)

82/2019 Criminal Appeal MUMTAZ @ MUMTAZ ALI & ANOTHER (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent) Sindh High Court Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah(Author) Order Date: 30-MAY-22 After amendment of the charge, the evidence already recorded with chance to the newly joined accused to make cross examination to the complainant and PW. Such act, obviously has prejudiced accused in their defence seriously for the reason that evidence is to be taken in presence of the accused as is prescribed by section 353 Cr.P.C. Making copy and use of evidence of witnesses already recorded could not be approved.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.

This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

82/2019 Criminal Appeal MUMTAZ @ MUMTAZ ALI & ANOTHER (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)

Related judgments

Red Notices against Foreign National Proclaimed Offender

Judgment on Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act 2012

Domestic Violence (Prevention and Protection) Act 2013 explained in a Judgment

Article 140- Cross Examination of a Witness

Re-Examination is more important than Examination in Chief