👋 Welcome, visitor from Columbus, US!

74/2012 Civil Revision Mst. Hamida Fatima & another (Applicant) V/S M/S. Goodwill (Pvt) Ltd & another (Respondent)

Sindh High CourtCivil Law2015

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar

Share on WhatsApp

74/2012 Civil Revision Mst. Hamida Fatima & another (Applicant) V/S M/S. Goodwill (Pvt) Ltd & another (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar Order Date: 11-NOV-15

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----O. VII, R. 11(d), O. I, R. 10(3), (4) & O. VI, R. 17---Plaint, rejection of---Pleadings, amendment of---Amendment of plaint under O. I, R. 10(4), C.P.C. would not attract provision of O. VII, R. 11(d), C.P.C.---Defendant filed application under O. I, R. 10, C.P.C. to be joined as defendant in the suit, which was accepted by Trial Court, and plaintiff was, therefore, required to amend the plaint under O. I, R. 10(4), C.P.C.---Defendant, subsequently, filed another application under O. VII, R. 11, C.P.C., seeking rejection of amended plaint on ground that plaintiff had made certain averments in the plaint without first seeking permission under O. VI, R. 17, C.P.C., which was allowed by Trial Court and amended plaint was rejected---Appellate court, setting aside order of rejection, remanded the case holding that provision of O. VII, R.11, C.P.C. did not apply to the plaint amended under O. I, R. 10(4), C.P.C.---Validity---Amended plaint in question was not barred by any law, nor had defendant referred to any law to declare that the same was hit by such law---Provisions of O. I, R. 10, C.P.C. and O.VI, R. 17, C.P.C. operated in quite different circumstances---Provision of O. VI, R. 17, C.P.C. were not applicable to facts of present case---Revision petition was dismissed in circumstances.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Suit for Damages on Malicious Prosecution can be filed within one year

PLJ 2014 · Sindh High Court · 2014

Party can be added at any stage of the Trial

Sindh High Court · 2014

Permission to produce documents under order 13 rule 2

PLJ 2013 · Sindh High Court · 2013

Right to sue in case of Benamidar has six years limitation

PLJ 2010 Karachi 132 · Sindh High Court · 2010

There is difference between Power of Attorney and Will

PLJ 2008 Karachi 121 · Sindh High Court · 2008