6863/2019 Const. P. Taj Muhammad Ansari (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court2020

Bench: Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)

6863/2019 Const. P. Taj Muhammad Ansari (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Order Date: 11-MAR-20

the petitioner claims pensionary benefits from the Law department on account of his attaining the age of superannuation i.e. 60 years--petitioner was appointed as Assistant Public Prosecutor/Assistant Government Pleader on contract basis--In the light of Section 15 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973 and Rule 8 of Efficiency & Discipline Rules, 1973, the petitioner is not entitled to the pensionary benefits as he was / is not qualified to retain the aforesaid post in public office due to his conviction in the criminal cases.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.

This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

6863/2019 Const. P. Taj Muhammad Ansari (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Related judgments

Afaq Riaz Ahmad etc. V. Federation of Pakistan etc.

M.A. 89/2025 (S.B.) Mir Shakil Ur Rahman V/S Salman Iqbal & Another

M.A. 27/2019 (S.B.) Bin Safeer Supermarket V/S Aurangzeb and Others

Const. P. 5343/2025 (D.B.) Nida Faisal V/S Province of Sindh & others

Const. P. 3253/2026 (D.B.) M/s Al-Rahim Trading Co. (Pvt) Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors