6789/2018 Const. P. Shaukat Ali & Ors (Petitioner) V/S S.B.P & Ors (Respondent)
Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
6789/2018 Const. P. Shaukat Ali & Ors (Petitioner) V/S S.B.P & Ors (Respondent) Sindh High Court
Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi Order Date: 23-APR-26
In view of the foregoing discussion, it becomes obvious that the petitioners are, in substance, seeking extension of a benefit which was neither available nor legally recognized at the time of their retirement. Such a claim does not give rise to any enforceable fundamental right, nor does it fall within the scope of constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution. 18. However, without prejudice the rights of the parties, the exclusion of AMI from their pensionary benefits, in the facts and circumstances of the case, is a policy decision of the respondent Bank. 19. Accordingly, the petition is held to be not maintainable and is dismissed along with pending application(s).