6789/2018 Const. P. Shaukat Ali & Ors (Petitioner) V/S S.B.P & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court2026

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi

Share on WhatsApp
6789/2018 Const. P. Shaukat Ali & Ors (Petitioner) V/S S.B.P & Ors (Respondent) Sindh High Court Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi Order Date: 23-APR-26 In view of the foregoing discussion, it becomes obvious that the petitioners are, in substance, seeking extension of a benefit which was neither available nor legally recognized at the time of their retirement. Such a claim does not give rise to any enforceable fundamental right, nor does it fall within the scope of constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution. 18. However, without prejudice the rights of the parties, the exclusion of AMI from their pensionary benefits, in the facts and circumstances of the case, is a policy decision of the respondent Bank. 19. Accordingly, the petition is held to be not maintainable and is dismissed along with pending application(s).
Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Red Notices against Foreign National Proclaimed Offender

PLJ 2024 Karachi 138 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2024

Judgment on Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act 2012

PLJ 2023 Karachi 124 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2023

Domestic Violence (Prevention and Protection) Act 2013 explained in a Judgment

PLJ 2022 Cr.C. (Note) 154 · Sindh High Court · 2022

Article 140- Cross Examination of a Witness

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020

Re-Examination is more important than Examination in Chief

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020