64/1992 Civil Revision Province of Sindh and others (Applicant) V/S Rahim Buc,through his L.Rs.and others (Respondent)

Sindh High CourtCivil Law2022

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)

64/1992 Civil Revision Province of Sindh and others (Applicant) V/S Rahim Buc,through his L.Rs.and others (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author) Order Date: 14-JAN-22

Limitation. Revisional jurisdiction is corrective and supervisory in nature; hence, Court seized of a revision petition can exercise its suo motu jurisdiction to correct the errors of jurisdiction committed by the courts below and can condone delay Public document within the meaning of Article 85(1) & (4) of the Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, was admissible in evidence in terms of Article 76(f) ibid; hence, even if the same was not produced in original, they can be relied upon as secondary evidence.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.

This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

64/1992 Civil Revision Province of Sindh and others (Applicant) V/S Rahim Buc,through his L.Rs.and others (Respondent)

Related judgments

Suit for Damages on Malicious Prosecution can be filed within one year

Party can be added at any stage of the Trial

Permission to produce documents under order 13 rule 2

Right to sue in case of Benamidar has six years limitation

There is difference between Power of Attorney and Will