63/2000 Civil Revision Sachedino Kalwar (Applicant) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)

Sindh High CourtCivil Law2021

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author)

63/2000 Civil Revision Sachedino Kalwar (Applicant) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author) Order Date: 05-NOV-21

Applicant first chose to contest the matter before the Revenue authority by filing its objections and attending hearings, and then once the order was passed, filed a Suit challenging the same. When an order is an appealable order in terms of s.161 ibid, which has not been availed, then the very maintainability of the Suit under section 9 CPC is big question mark; and impliedly bars jurisdiction of the Civil Court in such matters where the jurisdiction to adjudicate exclusively vested with the revenue Courts. . Admittedly, the Applicant failed to avail the statutory remedied of appeal and revision before the Commissioner and the Board of Revenue respectively against the orders passed by the Assistant Commissioner

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.

This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

63/2000 Civil Revision Sachedino Kalwar (Applicant) V/S Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)

Related judgments

Suit for Damages on Malicious Prosecution can be filed within one year

Party can be added at any stage of the Trial

Permission to produce documents under order 13 rule 2

Right to sue in case of Benamidar has six years limitation

There is difference between Power of Attorney and Will