6024/2025 Const. P. Syed Khalid Mahmud & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Yaseen & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court2026

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi

Share on WhatsApp
6024/2025 Const. P. Syed Khalid Mahmud & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Muhammad Yaseen & Ors (Respondent) Sindh High Court Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi Order Date: 02-FEB-26 For the reasons above, the Trial Court did not misread the law it applied settled principles governing the appointment of a receiver. There was/is no clear evidence of waste, mismanagement, or imminent loss that would justify appointing a receiver. The petitioners??? failed to show a strong prima facie case for the aforesaid purpose. The discretionary relief of appointing a receiver was refused based on certain reasons. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 26 03 2025 is legally sound, and the petition seeking its setting aside is dismissed along with pending application(s). However the trial Court shall expedite the proceedings to its logical conclusion as per law.
Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Red Notices against Foreign National Proclaimed Offender

PLJ 2024 Karachi 138 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2024

Judgment on Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act 2012

PLJ 2023 Karachi 124 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2023

Domestic Violence (Prevention and Protection) Act 2013 explained in a Judgment

PLJ 2022 Cr.C. (Note) 154 · Sindh High Court · 2022

Article 140- Cross Examination of a Witness

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020

Re-Examination is more important than Examination in Chief

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020