599/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Zahid Khan S/o Muhammad Mutloob Khan (Petitioner) V/S Mrs. Zainab and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court2019

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)

Share on WhatsApp
599/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Zahid Khan S/o Muhammad Mutloob Khan (Petitioner) V/S Mrs. Zainab and others (Respondent) Sindh High Court Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) Order Date: 29-MAY-19 . If these are the pleadings then this is not a personal requirement. At the most it is a case that a fair rent is not being tendered by the tenant and resort could be made under section 8 of the SRPO, 1979. Under Qanoon-e-Shahadat, the evidence at best could support pleadings but additional case can not be made. The witnesses have taken U-turn in evidence when they deposed that premises are required for personal use. Pleadings of the parties cannot be ignored and evidence cannot be read in isolation. Advocates: Tarique Ali Jakhrani(ADVO-2406-SBC-HYD),Imran Hussain(ADVO-14606-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Arif(ADVO-11800-SBC-KHI)
Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Red Notices against Foreign National Proclaimed Offender

PLJ 2024 Karachi 138 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2024

Judgment on Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act 2012

PLJ 2023 Karachi 124 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2023

Domestic Violence (Prevention and Protection) Act 2013 explained in a Judgment

PLJ 2022 Cr.C. (Note) 154 · Sindh High Court · 2022

Article 140- Cross Examination of a Witness

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020

Re-Examination is more important than Examination in Chief

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020