👋 Welcome, visitor from Columbus, US!

599/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Zahid Khan S/o Muhammad Mutloob Khan (Petitioner) V/S Mrs. Zainab and others (Respondent)

Sindh High CourtProperty & Rent2019

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)

Share on WhatsApp

599/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Zahid Khan S/o Muhammad Mutloob Khan (Petitioner) V/S Mrs. Zainab and others (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) Order Date: 29-MAY-19

. If these are the pleadings then this is not a personal requirement. At the most it is a case that a fair rent is not being tendered by the tenant and resort could be made under section 8 of the SRPO, 1979. Under Qanoon-e-Shahadat, the evidence at best could support pleadings but additional case can not be made. The witnesses have taken U-turn in evidence when they deposed that premises are required for personal use. Pleadings of the parties cannot be ignored and evidence cannot be read in isolation. Advocates: Tarique Ali Jakhrani(ADVO-2406-SBC-HYD),Imran Hussain(ADVO-14606-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Arif(ADVO-11800-SBC-KHI)

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Arbitration Judgment in Aviation Case by Supreme Court of Pakistan

PLJ 2018 SC 504 · Sindh High Court · 2018

Contract which is in its nature revocable cannot be specifically enforced

PLJ 2016 · Sindh High Court · 2016

Review of Order of Board

PLJ 2013 · Sindh High Court · 2013

Contents of Plaint are important for Rejection of Plaint

PLJ 2009 · Sindh High Court · 2009

Termination of Agency of Contract

PLJ 2007 · Sindh High Court · 2007