5645/2016 Const. P. Rubeena Yasmeen (Petitioner) V/S PTCL and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court2020

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)

5645/2016 Const. P. Rubeena Yasmeen (Petitioner) V/S PTCL and Ors (Respondent) Sindh High Court Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Order Date: 16-NOV-20 VSS is a binding contract and nothing about its unconstitutionality was established nor is there any substance to render it as void under the Contract Act. In the entire scheme of Pension Act and rules, there is nothing to prevent the employees from entering into a contract in the bargain with their post-retirement or pensionary benefits which they could have availed, for any prompt gain.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.

This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

5645/2016 Const. P. Rubeena Yasmeen (Petitioner) V/S PTCL and Ors (Respondent)

Related judgments

Red Notices against Foreign National Proclaimed Offender

Judgment on Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act 2012

Domestic Violence (Prevention and Protection) Act 2013 explained in a Judgment

Article 140- Cross Examination of a Witness

Re-Examination is more important than Examination in Chief