55/2009 Suit.B M/S.MYBANK LTD (Plaintiff) V/S M/S.APOLLO TEXTILE MILLS LTD (Defendant)

Sindh High Court2017

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)

Share on WhatsApp
55/2009 Suit.B M/S.MYBANK LTD (Plaintiff) V/S M/S.APOLLO TEXTILE MILLS LTD (Defendant) Sindh High Court Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) Order Date: 31-JAN-17 The case under banking jurisdiction is governed by special statute i.e. Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001 and in terms of Section 9(2) this special statute requires the statement of account to be certified under Act 1891. The provisions of this law would become redundant in case the contention of the plaintiff is considered to be correct. This sole ground is sufficient to grant unconditional leave to the defendants. Advocates: Nadeem Ahmed Khan(ADVO-10592-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Farogh Naseem(ADVO-3459-SBC-KHI),M/s Ahmed & Qazi Law Associate(),Ikhtiar Ali(ADVO-12252-SBC-KHI),Deedar Ali(ADVO-10218-SBC-KHC)
Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Red Notices against Foreign National Proclaimed Offender

PLJ 2024 Karachi 138 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2024

Judgment on Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act 2012

PLJ 2023 Karachi 124 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2023

Domestic Violence (Prevention and Protection) Act 2013 explained in a Judgment

PLJ 2022 Cr.C. (Note) 154 · Sindh High Court · 2022

Article 140- Cross Examination of a Witness

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020

Re-Examination is more important than Examination in Chief

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020