👋 Welcome, visitor from Columbus, US!

54/2010 I. A Province of Sindh & Ors (Appellant) V/S Land Acquisition Officer & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High CourtCivil Law2015

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar

Share on WhatsApp

54/2010 I. A Province of Sindh & Ors (Appellant) V/S Land Acquisition Officer & Ors (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar Order Date: 28-SEP-15

(a) Land Acquisition Act (I of 1894)--- ----S. 18---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S.79---Land acquisition---Reference to court, rejection of---Appeal---Limitation---Void order---Reference to court was rejected on the ground that beneficiary of acquisition had no right to file a reference or appeal---Validity---Referee Court refused to entertain the reference filed by the beneficiary of the award under the misconception of law---Impugned order was without jurisdiction---Jurisdiction vested in the Referee Court had not been exercised properly---Reference was maintainable in circumstances---Bar of limitation was not applicable to the appeal as impugned order was void ab initio and nullity---Beneficiary of acquisition could file a reference or appeal if he was a party before the Referee Court---Reference was not hit by S.79, C.P.C.---Case was remanded to the Referee Court for deciding the same in accordance with law within a specified period---Appeal was allowed in circumstances. BP Pakistan Exploration and Production v. Sher Ali Khawaja PLD 2008 SC 400 and Water and Power Development Authority v. Ghulam Shabbir 2009 SCMR 1051 ref. Land Acquisition Collector v. Muhammad Nawaz PLD 2010 SC 745; Land Acquisition Collector v. Sarfaraz Khan PLD 2001 SC 514; and Sherbano v. Kamil Muhammad Khan PLD 2012 Sindh 293 rel. (b) Limitation--- ----No limitation would run against the void order.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Suit for Damages on Malicious Prosecution can be filed within one year

PLJ 2014 · Sindh High Court · 2014

Party can be added at any stage of the Trial

Sindh High Court · 2014

Permission to produce documents under order 13 rule 2

PLJ 2013 · Sindh High Court · 2013

Right to sue in case of Benamidar has six years limitation

PLJ 2010 Karachi 132 · Sindh High Court · 2010

There is difference between Power of Attorney and Will

PLJ 2008 Karachi 121 · Sindh High Court · 2008