👋 Welcome, visitor from Columbus, US!

5366/2022 Const. P. Hamza Faheem (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High CourtConstitutional Law2025

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon

Share on WhatsApp

5366/2022 Const. P. Hamza Faheem (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon Order Date: 28-AUG-25

The Constitution petition is not maintainable against the service matters of Pakistan's Armed Forces due to the constitutional bar in Article 199(3) of the Constitution of Pakistan, which prevents High Courts from issuing orders regarding the terms and conditions of service or actions taken in relation to Armed Forces members. This constitutional provision aims to maintain discipline within the forces by restricting judicial interference in their internal affairs. On the aforesaid proposition, we are guided by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Ex. Lt. Col. Anwar Aziz (PA-7122) vs. Federation of Pakistan (PLD 2001 SC549). We, therefore, in the absence of the exceptions as enunciated in the case law cited above, cannot travel beyond and dilate upon the merits of the instant case and interfere with any Order passed under the hierarchy of Respondents, pursuant to their applicable laws. However, if the appeal of the petitioner is pending, the same shall be decided within three months after hearing the petitioner. 6. In the light of the foregoing, we are of the view that the case of petitioner squarely falls within the ambit of the ouster clause of Article 199(3) of the Constitution, therefore, there is a bar of jurisdiction of this Court from entertaining the instant Constitutional Petition, which is accordingly dismissed.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

No case if EOI is not submitted on time

PLJ 2108 SC 208 · Sindh High Court · 2019

Commercial and Service Activities of Civil Aviation Authority

PLJ 2017 SC 558 · Sindh High Court · 2017

Responsibility of NHA in road Accidents

PLJ 2016 · Sindh High Court · 2016

Legal Status of Sale Deed could not be resolved in Rent Proceedings

Sindh High Court · 2015

Decree of Khula on unregistered Nikahnama

PLJ 2014 · Sindh High Court · 2014