52/2009 R.A (Civil Revision) Abdul Hakeem (Applicant) V/S Ameenuddin Since Deceased Through his Legal Heirs (Respondent)

52/2009 R.A (Civil Revision) Abdul Hakeem (Applicant) V/S Ameenuddin Since Deceased Through his Legal Heirs (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar Order Date: 03-NOV-16

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----S. 115 & O. VII, R. 11---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), S.9---Suit for possession of immovable property---Revision---Competency---Phrase "no appeal lies" in S.115, C.P.C."---Scope---Plaint was rejected by Trial Court but Appellate Court converted the suit for declaration and permanent injunction into a suit for recovery of possession---Validity---Law had specifically barred an appeal against the dismissal of suit under S.9 of Specific Relief Act, 1877---Revision against the impugned appellate order was not maintainable as appeal had been barred by law---Revisional Court could not find any jurisdictional defect in the order passed by the appellate court when appeal was barred by law---Revision would lie when no appeal lay---Phrase "no appeal lies" in S.115, C. P. C could not be equated with the phrase "no appeal shall lie" used in S.9 of Specific Relief Act, 1877---Right and entitlement of the parties could not be determined in the suit under S.9 of Specific Relief Act, 1877---Lawful claimant could file a civil suit for his title and recovery of possession thereof---Revision was dismissed in circumstances.