4992/2025 Const. P. Mst. Nuzhat (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court2026

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi

Share on WhatsApp
4992/2025 Const. P. Mst. Nuzhat (Petitioner) V/S Govt of Sindh & Ors (Respondent) Sindh High Court Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi Order Date: 11-MAR-26 In view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in 2025 SCMR 168, and keeping in view the undisputed fact that the petitioner has rendered about fifteen years of continuous service with the respondent institution, this Court is of the considered view that the respondents were not justified in excluding the contractual period from the computation of qualifying service for pensionary purposes. 14. Consequently, the petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to count the petitioner???s contractual service from 16-06-2009 to 14-08-2015 along with her regular service for the purpose of determining qualifying service for pension and thereafter calculate and release the petitioner???s pensionary benefits in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order.
Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Red Notices against Foreign National Proclaimed Offender

PLJ 2024 Karachi 138 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2024

Judgment on Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act 2012

PLJ 2023 Karachi 124 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2023

Domestic Violence (Prevention and Protection) Act 2013 explained in a Judgment

PLJ 2022 Cr.C. (Note) 154 · Sindh High Court · 2022

Article 140- Cross Examination of a Witness

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020

Re-Examination is more important than Examination in Chief

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020