4605/2013 Const. P. Amanullah Tamimy (Petitioner) V/S Federation of Pakistan & another (Respondent)
Sindh High Court
Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Order Date: 01-JUN-17
Petitioners have approached this Court for regularization of their service in Pakistan State Oil Company Ltd. Their case is that they were appointed on wages in lower grade indifferent vacant posts from1984 to 2013 in different years. Petitioners further assertion is that they are eligible to be regularized under Office Memorandum Government of Pakistan, Cabinet Secretariat, Establishment. Petitions in order to prove that Petitioners are in the employment of Respondent No.3 and contended that Petitioners are taking all benefits of increment, salaries insurance, sickness, receiving workers participation fund as employees of contractor. On merits, the case of Petitioners is that they are working with Respondent No.2 for several years, but are not being regularized in service. In the light of above facts and circumstances, the Petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby Chief Executive Officer of Respondent Company/Respondent No.2 is directed to consider the case of Petitioners for regularization of their service without discrimination, in accordance with law and the dicta laid down by Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases In the light of above facts and circumstances, the Petitions are disposed of in the terms whereby Chief Executive Officer of Respondent Company/Respondent No.2 is directed to consider the case of Petitioners for regularization of their service without discrimination, in accordance with law and the dicta laid down by Honble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the cases referred to hereinabove within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this judgment. application(s) stand disposed of accordinglyFull judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error,
let us know.