4499/2019 Const. P. Adil Khan & Ors (Vide Order dt: 01.01.2021) (Petitioner) V/S NBP and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court2026

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)

Share on WhatsApp
4499/2019 Const. P. Adil Khan & Ors (Vide Order dt: 01.01.2021) (Petitioner) V/S NBP and Ors (Respondent) Sindh High Court Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) Order Date: 21-MAY-26 30. For the foregoing reasons, we are of the considered view that the petitioners, having admittedly been engaged through third-party contractors or outsourcing agencies and not directly appointed by the respondent Bank through any lawful recruitment process, possess no vested legal right to seek regularization, absorption, or permanent appointment in the service of the respondent institution. Their engagement through outsourced arrangements neither creates any employer-employee relationship with the Bank nor confers any enforceable constitutional or statutory entitlement in their favour. Consequently, the instant petitions, being devoid of merit and unsupported by any lawful entitlement, are hereby dismissed along with all pending applications. The petitioners, if so advised, may avail any remedy otherwise available to them under the relevant labour laws, contractual arrangements, or other forums of competent jurisdiction against their respective contractors or service providers strictly in accordance with law. However, such grievances cannot be transformed into a claim for regular appointment in the service of the National Bank of Pakistan in the absence of lawful induction through prescribed procedure. 31. Before parting with this judgment, it may be observed that dismissal of the present petitions shall not preclude the petitioners from availing any remedy otherwise available to them under the relevant labour laws or contractual arrangements against their respective employers, contractors, or service providers strictly in accordance with law.
Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Red Notices against Foreign National Proclaimed Offender

PLJ 2024 Karachi 138 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2024

Judgment on Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act 2012

PLJ 2023 Karachi 124 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2023

Domestic Violence (Prevention and Protection) Act 2013 explained in a Judgment

PLJ 2022 Cr.C. (Note) 154 · Sindh High Court · 2022

Article 140- Cross Examination of a Witness

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020

Re-Examination is more important than Examination in Chief

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020