👋 Welcome, visitor from Columbus, US!

4499/2019 Const. P. Adil Khan & Ors (Vide Order dt: 01.01.2021) (Petitioner) V/S NBP and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court2026

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)

Share on WhatsApp

4499/2019 Const. P. Adil Khan & Ors (Vide Order dt: 01.01.2021) (Petitioner) V/S NBP and Ors (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) Order Date: 21-MAY-26

30. For the foregoing reasons, we are of the considered view that the petitioners, having admittedly been engaged through third-party contractors or outsourcing agencies and not directly appointed by the respondent Bank through any lawful recruitment process, possess no vested legal right to seek regularization, absorption, or permanent appointment in the service of the respondent institution. Their engagement through outsourced arrangements neither creates any employer-employee relationship with the Bank nor confers any enforceable constitutional or statutory entitlement in their favour. Consequently, the instant petitions, being devoid of merit and unsupported by any lawful entitlement, are hereby dismissed along with all pending applications. The petitioners, if so advised, may avail any remedy otherwise available to them under the relevant labour laws, contractual arrangements, or other forums of competent jurisdiction against their respective contractors or service providers strictly in accordance with law. However, such grievances cannot be transformed into a claim for regular appointment in the service of the National Bank of Pakistan in the absence of lawful induction through prescribed procedure. 31. Before parting with this judgment, it may be observed that dismissal of the present petitions shall not preclude the petitioners from availing any remedy otherwise available to them under the relevant labour laws or contractual arrangements against their respective employers, contractors, or service providers strictly in accordance with law.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Afaq Riaz Ahmad etc. V. Federation of Pakistan etc.

PLJ 2011 Karachi 191 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2011

M.A. 89/2025 (S.B.) Mir Shakil Ur Rahman V/S Salman Iqbal & Another

2026 SHC KHI 1421 · Sindh High Court · 2026

M.A. 27/2019 (S.B.) Bin Safeer Supermarket V/S Aurangzeb and Others

2026 SHC KHI 1389 · Sindh High Court · 2026

Const. P. 5343/2025 (D.B.) Nida Faisal V/S Province of Sindh & others

2026 SHC KHI 1407 · Sindh High Court · 2026

Const. P. 3253/2026 (D.B.) M/s Al-Rahim Trading Co. (Pvt) Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors

2026 SHC KHI 1355 · Sindh High Court · 2026