4496/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Sadiq (Petitioner) V/S Chairman EOBI and Ors (Respondent)
Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
4496/2018 Const. P. Muhammad Sadiq (Petitioner) V/S Chairman EOBI and Ors (Respondent) Sindh High Court
Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon Order Date: 10-SEP-21
With regard to length of service, counsel for the EOBI contends that the petitioner remained employee of the respondent for a period of four years, therefore, he is not entitled for any benefit. Needless to mention that decision/termination was challenged by the petitioner in referred grievance application which was allowed, hence, it cannot be said that length of service of the petitioner was only four years. That service would be treated as upto the age of superannuation.