418/2016 Const. P. M Parvaiz Hayat (Petitioner) V/S VII ADJ (Respondent)

Sindh High CourtProperty & Rent2018

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)

418/2016 Const. P. M Parvaiz Hayat (Petitioner) V/S VII ADJ (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) Order Date: 21-FEB-18

In case the two tenements of same nature are allowed to be evicted under section 14 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 it would be in defiance of a restriction in terms of subsection 2 of Section 14 of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 that he (landlord) is not in occupation of a building (or independent portion) owned by him in any locality. Once he (landlord) got possession of an independent portion of the building or a premises then he automatically ceased to be entitled under the said provision for a second shop. He may avail benefit under other provisions of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 for eviction of tenant but at least for the purposes of Section 14 Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 his remedy ceases when one portion of the building or an independent premises got vacated. Advocates: Iftikhar Jawed Qazi(ADVO-2356-SBC-KHE),In Person(INP),Advocate General Sindh(ADVO-GEN-SBC-KHI)

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.

This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

418/2016 Const. P. M Parvaiz Hayat (Petitioner) V/S VII ADJ (Respondent)

Related judgments

Arbitration Judgment in Aviation Case by Supreme Court of Pakistan

Contract which is in its nature revocable cannot be specifically enforced

Review of Order of Board

Contents of Plaint are important for Rejection of Plaint

Termination of Agency of Contract