340/2012 Cr.Bail Abdul Sattar Jaffery (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

Sindh High Court2013

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)

Share on WhatsApp
340/2012 Cr.Bail Abdul Sattar Jaffery (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent) Sindh High Court Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) Order Date: 20-MAR-13 It is matter of fact that a number of such mobile phones of china origin, namely, are Nasaki available in the market and alleged recovery of such mobile phone is not sufficient to decline the bail to the applicant, when the recovery itself is doubtful, as to whether it is the same set or it has been replaced. In addition to above there is delay of seven hours in lodging the F.I.R. The injuries allegedly caused are not on the vital part of the body and on the touchstone of the judgments referred above, the applicant is entitled for bail, which was accordingly granted by a short order and these are the reasons for the same.
Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Red Notices against Foreign National Proclaimed Offender

PLJ 2024 Karachi 138 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2024

Judgment on Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act 2012

PLJ 2023 Karachi 124 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2023

Domestic Violence (Prevention and Protection) Act 2013 explained in a Judgment

PLJ 2022 Cr.C. (Note) 154 · Sindh High Court · 2022

Article 140- Cross Examination of a Witness

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020

Re-Examination is more important than Examination in Chief

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020