3184/2021 Const. P. Tahira Haneef (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court2021

Bench: Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)

3184/2021 Const. P. Tahira Haneef (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice Mr. Justice Irfan Saadat Khan, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Order Date: 03-JUN-21

In the light of the above discussion, in our view, a deputationist could not be treated as an aggrieved person, because she has no vested right to remain on a post as deputationist forever or for a stipulated period and can be repatriated at any time to her parent department more particularly in the light of aforesaid decisions of the Honorable Supreme Court. Reference is also made to the case of Dr. Shafi-ur-Rehman Afridi V/s CDA, Islamabad through Chairman and others (2010 SCMR 378). Even otherwise she cannot continue to serve on deputation in Sindh Government after her removal from service by the parent department, as discussed supra.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.

This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

3184/2021 Const. P. Tahira Haneef (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)

Related judgments

Afaq Riaz Ahmad etc. V. Federation of Pakistan etc.

M.A. 89/2025 (S.B.) Mir Shakil Ur Rahman V/S Salman Iqbal & Another

M.A. 27/2019 (S.B.) Bin Safeer Supermarket V/S Aurangzeb and Others

Const. P. 5343/2025 (D.B.) Nida Faisal V/S Province of Sindh & others

Const. P. 3253/2026 (D.B.) M/s Al-Rahim Trading Co. (Pvt) Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors