👋 Welcome, visitor from Columbus, US!

309/2012 Cr.Bail Abdul Haque Chawro (Applicant) V/S The state (Respondent)

Sindh High CourtCriminal Law2013

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)

Share on WhatsApp

309/2012 Cr.Bail Abdul Haque Chawro (Applicant) V/S The state (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) Order Date: 21-JAN-13

It appears that the entry allegedly referred pertains to the year 2003, whereas the FIR was lodged in the year 2012, thus there is inordinate delay of nine years. Although the entry pertains to the year 2003, however, it is yet to be ascertained as to whether such entry was on account of the fraudulent act of the applicant who was neither posted nor claimed to have been acted and for that how the applicant could be made responsible. All that has been pointed out is that the sale certificate on the basis of such entry was made, which per learned State Counsel was bogus entry and have bogus sale certificate. It is also yet to be determined as to whether this forged entry was inserted in the record of rights during his tenure or prior to him.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Red Notices against Foreign National Proclaimed Offender

PLJ 2024 Karachi 138 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2024

Article 140- Cross Examination of a Witness

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020

Re-Examination is more important than Examination in Chief

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020

Further Inquiry in case of 17(1)(2) and 22(b) Emigration Ordinance 1979

PLJ 2019 Cr.C. (Note) 114 · Sindh High Court · 2019

PLJ 2018 Islamabad 28

PLJ 2018 Islamabad 28 · Sindh High Court · 2018