👋 Welcome, visitor from Columbus, US!

2920/2017 Const. P. Mst. Asma Shakeel (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sind and Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High CourtConstitutional Law2024

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro(Author)

Share on WhatsApp

2920/2017 Const. P. Mst. Asma Shakeel (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sind and Ors (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Soomro(Author) Order Date: 31-MAY-24

Ownership disputes over industrial plots and unsubstantiated KDA claims invoke "Nemo dat qui non habet," invalidating KDA allotments. Article 199 enforces pre-existing rights; factual disputes for civil courts. Declarations under section 42 of Specific Relief Act confirm rights. Only 9 of 21 village acres regularized, encroachment defined under Act 2010. Petitions dismissed; D-4305 of 2016 advised BOR regularization.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

No case if EOI is not submitted on time

PLJ 2108 SC 208 · Sindh High Court · 2019

Commercial and Service Activities of Civil Aviation Authority

PLJ 2017 SC 558 · Sindh High Court · 2017

Responsibility of NHA in road Accidents

PLJ 2016 · Sindh High Court · 2016

Legal Status of Sale Deed could not be resolved in Rent Proceedings

Sindh High Court · 2015

Decree of Khula on unregistered Nikahnama

PLJ 2014 · Sindh High Court · 2014