👋 Welcome, visitor from Columbus, US!

29/2005 Suit.B THARPARKAR SUGAR MILLS LTD. (Plaintiff) V/S N.D.F.C. & ORS. (Defendant)

Sindh High CourtCivil Law2014

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)

Share on WhatsApp

29/2005 Suit.B THARPARKAR SUGAR MILLS LTD. (Plaintiff) V/S N.D.F.C. & ORS. (Defendant) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) Order Date: 18-NOV-14

"Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance (XLVI of 2001)--- ----Ss. 9, 19, 22 & 27---State Bank of Pakistan, BPD Circular No.29 dated 15-10-2002---Suit for declaration and injunction---Auction of property---Plaintiff company filed application for restraining defendant Bank from auctioning its property to recover outstanding amount in pursuance of decree passed in an earlier suit---Plea raised by plaintiff company was with regard to applicability of State Bank of Pakistan, BPD Circular No.29 dated 15-10-2002---Validity---Enforcement of BPD Circular No.29 by individual Banks to their respective customers was in fact the prerogative of Banks and it was for them to decide whether such debt outstanding against customer was a lost debt or recoverable in terms of assets mortgaged with them---State Bank of Pakistan, BPD Circular No.29 was binding once the Bank reached to a decision that such debt was not recoverable or a lost category and then procedure and perameters as laid down therein were to be adopted as a binding parameter but prima facie not in terms of its mandatory application---Judgment. and decree passed in earlier suit could not be made subservient to the outcome of present suit in terms of Ss. 22 & 27 of Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001---Any mode whereby consent decree passed in earlier suit was sought to be deferred, modified, altered and reviewed was violative of law--??Application was dismissed in circumstances."

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Suit for Damages on Malicious Prosecution can be filed within one year

PLJ 2014 · Sindh High Court · 2014

Party can be added at any stage of the Trial

Sindh High Court · 2014

Permission to produce documents under order 13 rule 2

PLJ 2013 · Sindh High Court · 2013

Right to sue in case of Benamidar has six years limitation

PLJ 2010 Karachi 132 · Sindh High Court · 2010

There is difference between Power of Attorney and Will

PLJ 2008 Karachi 121 · Sindh High Court · 2008