👋 Welcome, visitor from Columbus, US!

269/2023 Cr.Rev M/S MAPLE PHARMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD & ORS (Applicant) V/S LEARNED CHAIRMAIN DRUG COURT KHI (Respondent)

Sindh High CourtCriminal Law2024

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)

Share on WhatsApp

269/2023 Cr.Rev M/S MAPLE PHARMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD & ORS (Applicant) V/S LEARNED CHAIRMAIN DRUG COURT KHI (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Order Date: 22-OCT-24

It is well settled that the report of an expert cannot be used as evidence without taking it on record and exhibiting it to provide an opportunity for cross-examination. The Cr.P.C. allows certain expert reports to be admitted in evidence without calling the expert as a witness. This is to save time and speed up trials. However, the court may still summon and examine the expert if necessary. The admissibility of test reports has been questioned. However, the Qanun-e Shahadat Order (QSO) and Cr.P.C. should be interpreted progressively to give more space to modern forensic science.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Red Notices against Foreign National Proclaimed Offender

PLJ 2024 Karachi 138 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2024

Article 140- Cross Examination of a Witness

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020

Re-Examination is more important than Examination in Chief

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020

Further Inquiry in case of 17(1)(2) and 22(b) Emigration Ordinance 1979

PLJ 2019 Cr.C. (Note) 114 · Sindh High Court · 2019

PLJ 2018 Islamabad 28

PLJ 2018 Islamabad 28 · Sindh High Court · 2018