👋 Welcome, visitor from Columbus, US!

2322/2024 Const. P. Muhammad Umair (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High CourtTax Law2024

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad

Share on WhatsApp

2322/2024 Const. P. Muhammad Umair (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author), Hon'ble Justice Mrs. Rashida Asad Order Date: 05-JUL-24

The customs officials have only held the goods and have not passed an order as required under section 17 of Customs Act, 1969 that whether on account of such deviation and in the light of Methyl Bromide test/fumigation having been performed and certificate of physical inspection having been issued by the Department of Plant Protection whether the subject consignment could be subjected to the detention, seizure, confiscation or could be subjected to the fine/ penalty only or otherwise.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

What is cause of Action?

PLJ 2011 Karachi 52 · Sindh High Court · 2011

Const. P. 1532/2021 (D.B.) M/s Mujahid Oil Refinery Pvt Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others

Sindh High Court

3309/2011 Const. P. M/S Ibrahim Fibres Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Prov. of Sindh and ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2021

1019/2019 Const. P. Muhammad Ayaz Khan & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2020

128/2011 Spl. Cus. Ref. A. Collector Model Customs Hyderabad (Applicant) V/S M/s Khuda Raheem & anothe (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2011