22/2010 H.C.A Arshad Naseemuddin Ahmed (Appellant) V/S Javed Baloch & Ors. (Respondent)

Sindh High CourtCompany Law2012

Bench: Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)

Share on WhatsApp

22/2010 H.C.A Arshad Naseemuddin Ahmed (Appellant) V/S Javed Baloch & Ors. (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) Order Date: 02-MAY-12

It is neither obligatory nor lawful to have always decide the application under section 47 and Order XXI rule 95, 100, 103 CPC by recording the evidence. It actually depends upon the facts and circumstances of each case. The learned Single Judge has done nothing wrong while dismissing the application summarily since there was no material or facts which were required to be investigated.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.

This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

4/2011 H.C.A Salehbhoy through LRs (In person) (Appellant) V/S M/s. Pak Maniar Investment (Pvt.) Limited and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2012

223/2008 H.C.A Abdul Rasheed & Ors. (Appellant) V/S Abdul Ghani & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2011

22/2010 H.C.A Arshad Naseemuddin Ahmed (Appellant) V/S Javed Baloch & Ors. (Respondent)

Related judgments

Arbitration Award can be set aside with consent of parties

Alienation of Property Judgment

299/2021 H.C.A Asif Siddik Adam (Appellant) V/S Siddiki Fun Trust & Others (Respondent)

4/2011 H.C.A Salehbhoy through LRs (In person) (Appellant) V/S M/s. Pak Maniar Investment (Pvt.) Limited and others (Respondent)

223/2008 H.C.A Abdul Rasheed & Ors. (Appellant) V/S Abdul Ghani & Ors (Respondent)