2088/2017 Const. P. Muhammad Rafique (Petitioner) V/S Mst Haseena & Ors (Respondent)
Sindh High Court
Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
Order Date: 07-DEC-18
Two things are admitted in the cross-examination of the petitioner / defendant No.1; first is that certain dowry articles were retained by him and that in the other set of evidence he stated that only golden ornaments were taken away by the plaintiff / respondent No.1 from the house. The first part insofar as above dowry articles are concerned, the same are admitted whereas for the other dowry articles i.e. golden ornaments, the burden was on defendant / petitioner to establish that she (respondent No.1) took away all of them.Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error,
let us know.