2037/2021 Suit Natasha Malik (Plaintiff) V/S Naeem Malik & others (Defendant)

Sindh High Court2023

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)

Share on WhatsApp
2037/2021 Suit Natasha Malik (Plaintiff) V/S Naeem Malik & others (Defendant) Sindh High Court Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) Order Date: 10-MAY-23 As per Article 128 of the |Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 the only person competent to dispute the parentage of the plaintiff would be her putative father (and that too only if the father had refused to own the child from the outset). However, defendants No.1 and 2 contend that Article 128 is only applicable to cases where illegitimacy is being contended and not to cases of adoption. The approach of our superior courts in response to Article 128 covers both.
Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Red Notices against Foreign National Proclaimed Offender

PLJ 2024 Karachi 138 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2024

Judgment on Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act 2012

PLJ 2023 Karachi 124 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2023

Domestic Violence (Prevention and Protection) Act 2013 explained in a Judgment

PLJ 2022 Cr.C. (Note) 154 · Sindh High Court · 2022

Article 140- Cross Examination of a Witness

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020

Re-Examination is more important than Examination in Chief

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020