👋 Welcome, visitor from Columbus, US!

R.A (Civil Revision) 186/2011 (S.B.) Muhammad Ramzan V/S Chandarban and other

2026 SHC SUK 1924Sindh High CourtCivil Law2026

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)

Share on WhatsApp

R.A (Civil Revision) 186/2011 (S.B.) Muhammad Ramzan V/S Chandarban and other Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)

In a suit under Section 8 of the Act of 1877, the manner of dispossession is no ingredient of relief, where title stands proved, the case turns on the identity of the plot on the ground, which the court may settle by a local investigation of its own motion under Section 75 read with Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC. A decree for possession of a plot left unidentified, with the commission ordered after judgment, is not executable and both decrees being so flawed, remand follows.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. View the full order on the official Sindh High Court portal.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Suit for Damages on Malicious Prosecution can be filed within one year

PLJ 2014 · Sindh High Court · 2014

Party can be added at any stage of the Trial

Sindh High Court · 2014

Permission to produce documents under order 13 rule 2

PLJ 2013 · Sindh High Court · 2013

Right to sue in case of Benamidar has six years limitation

PLJ 2010 Karachi 132 · Sindh High Court · 2010

There is difference between Power of Attorney and Will

PLJ 2008 Karachi 121 · Sindh High Court · 2008