Const. P. 1634/2024 (D.B.) Niaz Ali Khoso V/S P.O Sindh & Others

2026 SHC SUK 1554Sindh High Court2026

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Osman Ali Hadi

Const. P. 1634/2024 (D.B.) Niaz Ali Khoso V/S P.O Sindh & Others Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Osman Ali Hadi

Pension is a vested constitutional right, not a bounty. Once an employee completes the qualifying period of service, neither a subsequent voluntary resignation, nor its finality under the service rules, nor delay in claiming, nor unrelated misconduct alleged in later employment, can operate to forfeit benefits already earned; Rule 2.11 of the West Pakistan Civil Services Pension Rules and Regulation 418, C.S.R. apply only to incomplete service and cannot be read as instruments of confiscation.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. View the full order on the official Sindh High Court portal.

This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Const. P. 1634/2024 (D.B.) Niaz Ali Khoso V/S P.O Sindh & Others

Related judgments

Afaq Riaz Ahmad etc. V. Federation of Pakistan etc.

M.A. 89/2025 (S.B.) Mir Shakil Ur Rahman V/S Salman Iqbal & Another

M.A. 27/2019 (S.B.) Bin Safeer Supermarket V/S Aurangzeb and Others

Const. P. 5343/2025 (D.B.) Nida Faisal V/S Province of Sindh & others

Const. P. 3253/2026 (D.B.) M/s Al-Rahim Trading Co. (Pvt) Ltd V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors