19/2014 F.R.A SHAM KUMAR S/O HUND RAJ (Appellant) V/S ULFAT SHAHEEN & ANOTHER (Respondent)
Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author)
19/2014 F.R.A SHAM KUMAR S/O HUND RAJ (Appellant) V/S ULFAT SHAHEEN & ANOTHER (Respondent) Sindh High Court
Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar(Author) Order Date: 10-JUN-20
Cantonments Rent Restriction Act (XI of 1963)--- ----S. 17---Ejectment of tenant---Denial of relationship of landlord and tenant by the tenant---Default in payment of rent---Effect---Rent Controller accepted ejectment petition and directed the tenant to vacate the demised premises---Validity---Tenant had admitted that he had paid rent to the husband of landlady---Relationship of landlord and tenant existed between the parties---Tenant had not denied the ownership of landlady and he had entered in the demised premises as tenant---Tenant had committed default in payment of rent in the present case---Tenant had neither sent rent to the landlady or her husband through money order nor deposited the same in the Court---Tenant was directed to pay the defaulted rent and vacate the demised premises within fifteen days---Appeal was dismissed, in circumstances. Messrs MFMY Industries v. Federation of Pakistan 2015 SCMR 1550 rel.